Literature DB >> 33139313

Challenges of a simplified opt-out consent process in a neonatal randomised controlled trial: qualitative study of parents' and health professionals' views and experiences.

Jenny McLeish1, Fiona Alderdice1, Helen Robberts2, Christina Cole1, Jon Dorling3, Chris Gale4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More effective recruitment strategies like alternative approaches to consent are needed to facilitate adequately powered trials. Witholding Enteral feeds Around Transfusion was a multicentre, randomised, pilot trial that compared withholding and continuing feeds around transfusion. The primary clinical outcome was necrotising enterocolitis. The trial used simplified opt-out consent with concise parent information and no consent form.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the views and experiences of parents and health professionals on the acceptability and feasibility of opt-out consent in randomised comparative effectiveness trials.
METHODS: A qualitative, descriptive interview-based study nested within a randomised trial. Semistructured interview transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
SETTING: Eleven neonatal units in England. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven parents and ten health professionals with experience of simplified consent.
RESULTS: Five themes emerged: 'opt-out consent operationalised as verbal opt-in consent', 'opt-out consent normalises participation while preserving parental choice', 'opt-out consent as an ongoing process of informed choice', 'consent without a consent form' and 'choosing to opt out of a comparative effectiveness trial', with two subthemes: 'wanting "normal care"' and 'a belief that feeding is better'.
CONCLUSION: Introducing a novel form of consent proved challenging in practice. The principle of a simplified, opt-out approach to consent was generally considered feasible and acceptable by health professionals for a neonatal comparative effectiveness trial. The priority for parents was having the right to decide about trial participation, and they did not see opt-out consent as undermining this. Describing a study as 'opt-out' can help to normalise participation and emphasise that parents can withdraw consent. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics; neonatology; qualitative research

Year:  2020        PMID: 33139313     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  2 in total

1.  Neonatal stroke surveillance study protocol in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  T'ng Chang Kwok; Robert A Dineen; William Whitehouse; Richard M Lynn; Niamh McSweeney; Don Sharkey
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-09-05

2.  Incorporating parent, former patient and clinician perspectives in the design of a national UK double-cluster, randomised controlled trial addressing uncertainties in preterm nutrition.

Authors:  William Lammons; Becky Moss; Cheryl Battersby; Victoria Cornelius; Daphne Babalis; Neena Modi
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-06-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.