Jamie E Anderson1, Gregory J Jurkovich2, Joseph M Galante1, Diana L Farmer1. 1. Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California. 2. Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California. Electronic address: gjjurkovich@ucdavis.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We seek to identify the current role and practices of the surgery morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference in academic surgery departments in the United States and Canada. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All members of the Society of Surgical Chairs, a program of the American College of Surgeons, were e-mailed an IRB-approved 28-question electronic survey in fall 2017. Up to 3 reminders were sent. RESULTS: Responses from 129/186 (69%) departments of surgery were received. Nearly all departments (96%) continue to have a departmental M&M conference. The M&M conference is typically weekly (93%), between 7 and 9 AM (80%), on weekdays during which there are no scheduled elective operations (84%). Attendance is mandatory for residents (98%), but required for faculty in only 49% of departments. Fewer than half of all departments (44%) have written guidelines as to which complications should be reported to M&M. Most conferences are prepared case presentations (89%), but may include unprepared discussions (17%), case-based educational presentations (30%), or a combination (28%). The most common classification category was by root case of the error (60%) and preventability (58%). Most departments keep electronic and/or physical M&M reports, while 21% maintain a relational database and 25% do not retain records. While almost all (96%) departments reported participating in at least one national quality improvement program, these are not often linked to the M&M process. CONCLUSIONS: M&M is predominantly seen as an educational conference based on a few select cases. Departmental quality is monitored with hospital-driven or national quality improvement efforts. Integration of hospital-based quality metric programs with surgery M&M conference is uncommon and represents an opportunity for hospital-department collaboration.
OBJECTIVE: We seek to identify the current role and practices of the surgery morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference in academic surgery departments in the United States and Canada. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All members of the Society of Surgical Chairs, a program of the American College of Surgeons, were e-mailed an IRB-approved 28-question electronic survey in fall 2017. Up to 3 reminders were sent. RESULTS: Responses from 129/186 (69%) departments of surgery were received. Nearly all departments (96%) continue to have a departmental M&M conference. The M&M conference is typically weekly (93%), between 7 and 9 AM (80%), on weekdays during which there are no scheduled elective operations (84%). Attendance is mandatory for residents (98%), but required for faculty in only 49% of departments. Fewer than half of all departments (44%) have written guidelines as to which complications should be reported to M&M. Most conferences are prepared case presentations (89%), but may include unprepared discussions (17%), case-based educational presentations (30%), or a combination (28%). The most common classification category was by root case of the error (60%) and preventability (58%). Most departments keep electronic and/or physical M&M reports, while 21% maintain a relational database and 25% do not retain records. While almost all (96%) departments reported participating in at least one national quality improvement program, these are not often linked to the M&M process. CONCLUSIONS: M&M is predominantly seen as an educational conference based on a few select cases. Departmental quality is monitored with hospital-driven or national quality improvement efforts. Integration of hospital-based quality metric programs with surgery M&M conference is uncommon and represents an opportunity for hospital-department collaboration.
Authors: Thomas Lustenberger; Simon Lars Meier; René Danilo Verboket; Philipp Störmann; Maren Janko; Johannes Frank; Ingo Marzi Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 4.241