| Literature DB >> 33138238 |
Sintayehu Abebe1, Muluken Dessalegn2,3, Yeshitila Hailu4, Misrak Makonnen4.
Abstract
Female genital cutting (FGC) remains highly prevalent in Ethiopia, in spite of a slowly decreasing trend over the last decade. In an effort to inform and strengthen FGC interventions in Ethiopia, this study aimed to assess FGC prevalence in cross-administrative border* districts and to explore barriers to ending FGC. A mixed methods, cross-sectional study was employed in three districts in the Afar and Amhara regions in Ethiopia. A sample of 408 women with female children under the age of 15 were included in the study. Additionally, 21 key informant interviews and three focus group discussions were held with local government officials and community stakeholders. The study found that the prevalence of FGC among mothers interviewed was 98%. Seventy-four percent of the female children of participants had undergone FGC. Of the youngest (last born) female children, 64.7% had experienced FGC. The participation of respondents in cross-administrative FGC practices ranged from 4% to 17%. Quantitative analysis found that knowledge and attitude towards FGC, level of literacy, place of residence, and religious denomination were associated with FGC practice. The study also found that the lack of participatory involvement of local women in programs that aim to end FGC and the lack of suitable legal penalties for those who practice FGC exacerbate the problem. A significant proportion of participants support the continuation of FGC practices in their communities. This finding indicates that FGC practice is likely to persist unless new approaches to intervention are implemented. It is recommended that a comprehensive response that couples community empowerment with strong enforcement of legislation is administered in order to effectively end FGC in Ethiopia by 2025, in alignment with the national plan against Harmful Traditional Practices. * Cross-administrative border means a border between two regional states in Ethiopia. In this document, it refers to the movement of people between Amhara and Afar regional states.Entities:
Keywords: cross-administrative border; female genital cutting barriers; socio-ecological model
Year: 2020 PMID: 33138238 PMCID: PMC7663154 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Socio-Ecological Model, (Source: CDC Official website) that affects to end FGC.
Socio-demographic characteristics of the Respondents, Amhara, Afar women, April 2020 (n = 405).
| Variable | Frequency | Percent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Place of residence | Rural | 320 | 79.0 |
| Urban | 85 | 21.0 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
| Region | Afar | 204 | 50.4 |
| Amhara | 201 | 49.6 | |
| Total | 405 | 100 | |
| Religion | Muslim | 239 | 59.0 |
| Orthodox Christian | 166 | 41.0 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
| Marital status | Divorced/widowed | 28 | 6.9 |
| Married | 374 | 92.3 | |
| Single | 3 | 0.7 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
| Partners Educational status | No education | 325 | 80.2 |
| Primary education | 69 | 17.0 | |
| Secondary education | 11 | 2.7 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
| Mothers Occupational status | Farmer | 113 | 27.9 |
| House wife | 266 | 65.7 | |
| Others | 26 | 6.4 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
| Ethnicity | Afar | 192 | 47.4 |
| Amhara | 201 | 49.6 | |
| Oromo | 12 | 3.0 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
| Mean age of mothers | 31.2 ± 7 | ||
| Mean number of female children | 2.41 ± 1.3 | ||
The experience of FGC for the mother and the children, Afar and Amhara, April 2020 (n = 405).
| Characteristics | Response | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mothers FGC status | No | 7 | 1.7 |
| Yes | 398 | 98.3 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
| Mothers who have at least one female child cut | Yes | 296 | 73.1 |
| No | 109 | 26.9 | |
| Total | 405 | 100 | |
| Total female children FGC status | Yes | 796 | 74.2 |
| No | 252 | 25.8 | |
| Total | 978 | 100 | |
| Mean ± SD * | 2.41 ± 1.3 | ||
| The youngest girl underwent FGC | No | 34 | 8.4 |
| Yes | 262 | 64.7 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
| FGC Performed by | Traditional cutters | 295 | 72.8 |
| Traditional birth attendant | 36 | 8.9 | |
| I don’t know | 70 | 17.3 | |
| Others | 4 | 0.9 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
* Standard Deviation (SD).
Figure 2FGC among Female family members, Afar and Amhara April 2020.
Comparison: Education, Age at time of FGC by region, Amhara, Afar women, April 2020 (n = 405).
| Characteristics | Youngest Child Circumcision Status | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mothers Educational status | Response | Not youngest | Yes | No | |
| No education | 56 | 209 | 23 | 288 | |
| Primary Education | 47 | 47 | 11 | 105 | |
| Secondary Education | 6 | 6 | 0 | 12 | |
| Total | 109 | 262 | 34 | 405 | |
| Age range of Circumcision | Total | ||||
| Region | <1 year | ≥1 year | |||
| Afar | 2 | 189 | 15 | 206 | |
| Amhara | 141 | 0 | 58 | 199 | |
| Total | 143 | 189 | 73 | 405 | |
The experience of women and child FGC, Afar, Amhara, April 2020 (n = 405).
| Characteristics | Response | Frequency | Per Cent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where the FGC practice took place? | Around my residence | 283 | 96% |
| Far away from my residence | 13 | 4% | |
| Total | 296 | 100% | |
| In which region did the last child’s FGC occur? | Afar | 196 | 66% |
| Amhara | 100 | 34% | |
| Total | 296 | 100% | |
| Do you think a member of another community brings their children to your community for FGC? | No | 335 | 82.7 |
| Yes | 70 | 17.3 | |
| Total | 405 | 100 | |
| Does a member of your community take their children to Afar or Amhara for FGC | No | 385 | 95.1 |
| Yes | 20 | 4.9 | |
| Total | 405 | 100 | |
| Did you travel to another district/region for FGC? | No | 391 | 96.5 |
| Yes | 14 | 3.5 | |
| Total | 405 | 100 | |
| What was the reason for crossing your administrative border | The law is stricter in our village | 14 | 93% |
| To have girls cut more discretely | 1 | 7% | |
| Total | 15 | 100% | |
| Do you support the continuation of FGC practice? | No | 208 | 51.4 |
| Yes | 197 | 48.6 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 | |
| Would you want your daughter(s) to be circumcised? | No | 216 | 53.3 |
| Yes | 189 | 46.7 | |
| Total | 405 | 100.0 |