| Literature DB >> 33138155 |
Basma G Eid1, Thikryat Neamatallah1, Abeer Hanafy1,2, Hany M El-Bassossy3, Hibah M Aldawsari4, Kiran Vemuri5, Alexandros Makriyannis5,6.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: AM4113; AM6545; cannabinoids; insulin resistance; metabolic syndrome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33138155 PMCID: PMC7692885 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56110573
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Liver content of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG).
| Control (C) | C + A65 | C + A41 | M | M + A65 | M + A41 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anandamide (pmol/g) | 4.34 ± 0.2 | 4.26 ± 0.35 | 4.38 ± 0.26 | 6.81 * ± 0.13 | 6.63 * ± 0.15 | 6.58 * ± 0.17 |
| 2-AG (nmol/g) | 6.465 ± 0.82 | 6.96 ± 0.83 | 6.71 ± 0.76 | 18.54 * ± 1.54 | 17.03 * ± 1.13 | 16.28 * ± 1.02 |
The table shows the anandamide and 2-AG content in the livers of control (C), AM6545-treated control (C+A65), AM4113-treated control (C+A41), metabolic (M), AM6545-treated metabolic (M+A65) and AM4113-treated metabolic (M+A41) rats. Data are presented as mean ± standard error, n = 8. * Significantly different from control at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Effect of AM6545 (A65) and AM4113 (A41) on insulin resistance (IR) index (a), blood glucose level (b) and serum insulin level (c) in normal (C) and metabolic syndrome rats (M). Data are presented as box plots with the mean of 8 rats shown as (+). * Significant difference compared with the control group (C) (p < 0.05). # Significant difference compared with the metabolic syndrome group (M) (p < 0.05) by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Figure 2Effect of AM6545 (A65) and AM4113 (A41) on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (a), and the respective AUC over the 120 min study time (b). Data in (a) are shown as the mean ± standard error of 8 rats. Data in (b) are presented as box plots with the mean of 8 rats shown as (+). * Significant difference compared with the control group (C) (p < 0.05). # Significant difference compared with the metabolic syndrome group (M) (p < 0.05) by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Figure 3(a) Changes in body weight caused by AM6545 (A65) and AM4113 (A41) in normal (C) and metabolic syndrome rats (M) over the 12 weeks of the study shown as the mean ± standard error of 8 rats. (b) Final body weights attained in the different experimental groups presented as box plots with the mean of 8 rats shown as (+). (c) Effects of AM6545 and AM4113 on the correlation between body weight and IR. * Significant difference compared with the control group (C) (p < 0.05). # Significant difference compared with the metabolic syndrome group (M) (p < 0.05) by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Figure 4Effect AM6545 (A65) and AM4113 (A41) on serum cholesterol level (a) and serum triglycerides (b) in normal (C) and metabolic syndrome rats (M). (c) Effects of AM6545 and AM4113 on the correlation between IR and serum cholesterol, and IR and serum triglycerides. Data in (a) and (b) are presented as box plots with the mean of 8 rats shown as (+). * Significant difference compared with the control group (C) (p < 0.05). # Significant difference compared with the metabolic syndrome group (M) (p < 0.05) by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Figure 5(a) Effects of AM6545 (A65) and AM4113 (A41) on serum uric acid levels in normal (C) and metabolic syndrome rats (M). (b) Effects of AM6545 and AM4113 on the correlation between IR and serum uric acid levels. Data are presented in (a) as box plots with the mean of 8 rats shown as (+). * Significant difference compared with the control group (C) (p < 0.05). # Significant difference compared with the metabolic syndrome group (M) (p < 0.05) by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Figure 6Effect of AM6545 (A65) and AM4113 (A41) on serum adiponectin levels (a) and liver content of TNF-α (b) in normal (C) and metabolic syndrome rats (M). (c) Effects of AM6545 and AM4113 on the correlation between IR and serum adiponectin, and between IR and liver TNF-α. Data are presented in (a) and (b) as box plots with the mean of 8 rats shown as (+). * Significant difference compared with the control group (C) (p < 0.05). # Significant difference compared with the metabolic syndrome group (M) (p < 0.05) by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test.