Literature DB >> 33137530

"Microplastic communities" in different environments: Differences, links, and role of diversity index in source analysis.

Changchao Li1, Yandong Gan2, Chao Zhang1, Huan He1, Jiaohui Fang2, Lifei Wang1, Yan Wang1, Jian Liu3.   

Abstract

Microplastics have been detected in various environments, yet the differences between microplastics in different environments are still largely unknown. Scientists have proposed the concept of the "microplastic cycle," but the evidence for the movement of microplastics between different environments is still scarce. By screening the literature and extracting information, we obtained microplastic data from 709 sampling sites in freshwater, seawater, freshwater sediment, sea sediment, and soil in China. Based on the similarity between microplastics and biological communities, here we propose the concept of a "microplastic community" and examine the differences, links, and diversity of microplastic communities in different environments. Wilcoxon sign-ranks test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) showed that there were significant differences in abundance, proportion of small microplastics, and community composition (shape, color, and polymer types) of microplastics in different environments. The Mantel test showed that there were significant correlations between microplastic community composition in different environments. Network analysis based on community similarity further confirmed the links between microplastic communities. The distance decay models revealed that the links weakened with the increase of geographic distance, suggesting that sampling sites with closed geographical locations had similar pollution sources and more easily to migrate or exchange microplastics. The microplastic diversity integrated index (MDII) was established based on the diversity of microplastic shape, color, and polymer types, and its indication of the number of microplastic pollution sources was verified by the statistical fitting relationship between the number of industrial pollution sources and MDII. Our study provides new insight into the differences and links between microplastics in different environments, which contributes to the microplastic risk assessment and demonstrates the "microplastic cycle." The establishment of the microplastic diversity integrated index could be used in source analysis of microplastics.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33137530     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  3 in total

1.  Microplastic Contamination in Urban, Farmland and Desert Environments along a Highway in Southern Xinjiang, China.

Authors:  Wenfeng Li; Shuzhi Wang; Rehemanjiang Wufuer; Jia Duo; Xiangliang Pan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Differences, links, and roles of microbial and stoichiometric factors in microplastic distribution: A case study of five typical rice cropping regions in China.

Authors:  Yao Yao; Lili Wang; Lingxuan Gong; Gang Li; Weiming Xiu; Xiaomei Yang; Bingchang Tan; Jianning Zhao; Guilong Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Long-Term Chili Monoculture Alters Environmental Variables Affecting the Dominant Microbial Community in Rhizosphere Soil.

Authors:  Wenjing Chen; Xiaodong Guo; Quanen Guo; Xuelian Tan; Zhigang Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.