Literature DB >> 33136732

The interobserver agreement of the HEART-score, a multicentre prospective study.

Kirsten F van Meerten1, Rowan M A Haan1, Ineke M C Dekker2, Henriëtte J J van Zweden1, Erik W van Zwet3, Barbra E Backus4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Chest pain is one of the most common presentations to the emergency department (ED). The HEART-score is used to assess the 30-day risk of developing a major adverse cardiac event (MACE). The HEART-score enables clinicians to classify patients in low, intermediate, or high-risk groups though little is known as to whether this can be done reliably and reproducibly in a prehospital setting.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the interobserver agreement of the HEART-score between ambulance nurses and ED physicians. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥18 years, with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin presented by ambulance to the EDs of four regional hospitals, were prospectively enrolled between October 2018 and April 2019. OUTCOMES MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was interobserver agreement of the HEART-scores calculated by ambulance nurses compared to those calculated by ED physicians. Agreement was measured using Cohen's Kappa (K) both for overall HEART-score and dichotomized HEART categories. A secondary endpoint was the occurrence of a MACE at 30 days after inclusion. MAIN
RESULTS: A total of 307 patients were enrolled of which 166 patients were male (54%). The mean age was 64.8 years. In 23% (95% confidence interval, 18-27), patients were scored in the low-risk category by both ambulance nurses and ED physicians. The K for the overall HEART-score compared between ambulance nurses and ED physicians was 0.514. The K for the low-risk category versus intermediate and high-risk category was 0.591. Both are defined as 'moderate'. MACE within 30 days occurred in 64 patients (21%). In the low-risk group as defined by the ambulance nurses, there was a 7% risk of MACE compared to an average 5% MACE risk in the ED physician group.
CONCLUSIONS: The moderate interobserver agreement of the HEART-score does not currently support the use of the HEART-score by ambulance nurses in a prehospital setting. Training for prehospital nurses is vital to ensure that they are able to calculate the HEART-score accurately.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33136732     DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0969-9546            Impact factor:   2.799


  3 in total

1.  Interrater agreement of the HEART score history component: A chart review study.

Authors:  Alec J Pawlukiewicz; Matthew R Geringer; W Tyler Davis; Daniel R Nassery; Michael D April; Matthew J Streitz; Jessica M Hyams; Alex W Martin; Sadie A Martin; Joshua J Oliver
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  SVEAT score outperforms HEART score in patients admitted to a chest pain observation unit.

Authors:  Daniel Antwi-Amoabeng; Chanwit Roongsritong; Moutaz Taha; Bryce David Beutler; Munadel Awad; Ahmed Hanfy; Jasmine Ghuman; Nicholas T Manasewitsch; Sahajpreet Singh; Claire Quang; Nageshwara Gullapalli
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-26

3.  A Prospective Evaluation of Clinical HEART Score Agreement, Accuracy, and Adherence in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients.

Authors:  William E Soares; Alex Knee; Seth R Gemme; Ruth Hambrecht; Stacy Dybas; Kye E Poronsky; Shelby C Mader; Timothy J Mader
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 6.762

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.