Virginia L Valentin1,2,3,4, Shahpar Najmabadi1,2,3,4, Jeffery Jones1,2,3,4, Christine M Everett1,2,3,4. 1. Virginia L. Valentin, DrPH, PA-C, is an associate professor for the Division of Physician Assistant Studies at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah. 2. Shahpar Najmabadi, PhD, MPH, is a postdoc in the Division of Physician Assistant Studies at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. Jeffery Jones, PhD, is an associate professor in the Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health at Georgia Southern University in Statesboro, Georgia. 4. Christine M. Everett, PhD, MPH, PA-C, is an associate professor for the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Division of PA Studies at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand the association between physician assistant (PA) state scope of practice (SOP) laws and (1) PA program growth and (2) PA graduate demographics. METHODS: Scope of practice laws were categorized as ideal, average, and restrictive. Descriptive statistics by year and SOP categories were determined for the number of states, population density, PA programs, and PA graduate number, gender, race, and mean age. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze demographic data by SOP categories. Adjusted risk ratios were generated for the number of PA programs and SOP categories. RESULTS: The number of PA programs is not associated with ideal SOP states. As of 2017, only 10 states have restrictive SOP laws. A minority of PA students now graduate from states with restrictive SOP laws. CONCLUSION: There is heterogeneity in PA SOP laws throughout the United States but only a minority of PA graduates now come from restrictive SOP states. This study provides foundational information prior to the implementation of optimal team practice.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand the association between physician assistant (PA) state scope of practice (SOP) laws and (1) PA program growth and (2) PA graduate demographics. METHODS: Scope of practice laws were categorized as ideal, average, and restrictive. Descriptive statistics by year and SOP categories were determined for the number of states, population density, PA programs, and PA graduate number, gender, race, and mean age. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze demographic data by SOP categories. Adjusted risk ratios were generated for the number of PA programs and SOP categories. RESULTS: The number of PA programs is not associated with ideal SOP states. As of 2017, only 10 states have restrictive SOP laws. A minority of PA students now graduate from states with restrictive SOP laws. CONCLUSION: There is heterogeneity in PA SOP laws throughout the United States but only a minority of PA graduates now come from restrictive SOP states. This study provides foundational information prior to the implementation of optimal team practice.
Authors: Trenton Honda; Trenton D Henry; Ellen D Mandel; Alicia Quella; José E Rodríguez; Shahpar Najmabadi; Virginia L Valentin Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 2.463