Literature DB >> 33135751

Sampling Efficacy and Survival Rates of Labarrus pseudolividus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) and Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Using Flotation and Sieve-Separation Methodology.

Fallon Fowler1, Tashiana Wilcox1, Stephanie Orr1, Wes Watson1.   

Abstract

Understanding collection methodologies and their limitations are essential when targeting specific arthropods for use in habitat restoration, conservation, laboratory colony formation, or when holistically representing local populations using ecological surveys. For dung beetles, the most popular collection methodology is baited traps, followed by light traps and unbaited flight-intercept traps during diversity surveys. A less common collection method, flotation, is assumed to be laborious and messy, and so only a handful of papers exist on its refinement and strengths. Our purpose was threefold: First, we tested the recovery and survival rates of Labarrus (=Aphodius) pseudolividus (Balthasar) and Onthophagus taurus (Schreber) when floating beetle-seeded dung pats to determine potential collection and safety issues. We collected 72.4 and 78% of the seeded L. pseudolividus and O. taurus, respectively, with >95% survival rating. Second, we developed a flotation-sieving technique that enables users to rapidly collect and passively sort dung beetles with less time and effort. Specifically, we often collected 50-100 g of wild dung beetles within a couple of hours of gathering dung and sorted them in a couple more by allowing dung beetles to sort themselves by size within a series of sieves; Third, we reviewed flotation-based advantages and disadvantages in comparison to other methodologies.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scarabaeidae; detection; ecology; monitoring; survey

Year:  2020        PMID: 33135751      PMCID: PMC7751142          DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaa083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Sci        ISSN: 1536-2442            Impact factor:   1.857


  4 in total

1.  Pheromone Lure and Trap Color Affects Bycatch in Agricultural Landscapes of Utah.

Authors:  Lori R Spears; Chris Looney; Harold Ikerd; Jonathan B Koch; Terry Griswold; James P Strange; Ricardo A Ramirez
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.377

2.  Bycatch of marine mammals in U.S. and global fisheries.

Authors:  Andrew J Read; Phebe Drinker; Simon Northridge
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Minimizing Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Bycatch in Japanese Beetle Traps.

Authors:  Steven J Sipolski; Sara W Datson; Michael Reding; Jason B Oliver; Steven R Alm
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.377

4.  Quantifying responses of dung beetles to fire disturbance in tropical forests: the importance of trapping method and seasonality.

Authors:  Rafael Barreto de Andrade; Jos Barlow; Julio Louzada; Fernando Zagury Vaz-de-Mello; Mateus Souza; Juliana M Silveira; Mark A Cochrane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.