Tom M Nolte1, Ward De Cooman2, Jos P M Vink3, Raf Elst2, Els Ryken2, Ad M J Ragas1, A Jan Hendriks1. 1. Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 2. Flanders Environment Agency (VMM), Dr. De Moorstraat 24-26, B-9300 Aalst, Belgium. 3. Unit Soil and Subsurface Systems, Deltares, P. O. Box 85467, 3508 AL Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
The densely populated North Sea region encompasses catchments of rivers such as Scheldt and Meuse. Herein, agricultural, industrial, and household chemicals are emitted, transported by water, and deposited in sediments, posing ecological risks. Though sediment monitoring is often costly and time-intensive, modeling its toxicity to biota has received little attention. Due to high complexity of interacting variables that induce overall toxicity, monitoring data only sporadically validates current models. Via a range of concepts, we related bio-physicochemical constituents of sediment in Flanders to results from toxicity bioassays performed on the ostracod Heterocypris incongruens. Depending on the water body, we explain up to 90% of the variance in H. incongruens growth. Though variable across Flanders' main water bodies, organotin cations and ammonia dominate the observed toxicity according to toxic unit (TU) assessments. Approximately 10% relates to testing conditions/setups, species variabilities, incoherently documented pollutant concentrations, and/or bio-physicochemical sediment properties. We elucidated the influence of organotin cations and ammonia relative to other metal(oxides) and biocides. Surprisingly, the tributylin cation appeared ∼1000 times more toxic to H. incongruens as compared to "single-substance" bioassays for similar species. We inferred indirect mixture effects between organotin, ammonia, and phosphate. Via chemical speciation calculations, we observed strong physicochemical and biological interactions between phosphate and organotin cations. These interactions enhance bioconcentration and explain the elevated toxicity of organotin cations. Our study aids water managers and policy makers to interpret monitoring data on a mechanistic basis. As sampled sediments differ, future modeling requires more emphasis on characterizing and parametrizing the interactions between bioassay constituents. We envision that this will aid in bridging the gap between testing in the laboratory and field observations.
The densely populated North Sea region encompasses catchments of rivers such as Scheldt and Meuse. Herein, agricultural, industrial, and household chemicals are emitted, transported by water, and deposited in sediments, posing ecological risks. Though sediment monitoring is often costly and time-intensive, modeling its toxicity to biota has received little attention. Due to high complexity of interacting variables that induce overall toxicity, monitoring data only sporadically validates current models. Via a range of concepts, we related bio-physicochemical constituents of sediment in Flanders to results from toxicity bioassays performed on the ostracod Heterocypris incongruens. Depending on the water body, we explain up to 90% of the variance in H. incongruens growth. Though variable across Flanders' main water bodies, organotin cations and ammonia dominate the observed toxicity according to toxic unit (TU) assessments. Approximately 10% relates to testing conditions/setups, species variabilities, incoherently documented pollutant concentrations, and/or bio-physicochemical sediment properties. We elucidated the influence of organotin cations and ammonia relative to other metal(oxides) and biocides. Surprisingly, the tributylin cation appeared ∼1000 times more toxic to H. incongruens as compared to "single-substance" bioassays for similar species. We inferred indirect mixture effects between organotin, ammonia, and phosphate. Via chemical speciation calculations, we observed strong physicochemical and biological interactions between phosphate and organotin cations. These interactions enhance bioconcentration and explain the elevated toxicity of organotin cations. Our study aids water managers and policy makers to interpret monitoring data on a mechanistic basis. As sampled sediments differ, future modeling requires more emphasis on characterizing and parametrizing the interactions between bioassay constituents. We envision that this will aid in bridging the gap between testing in the laboratory and field observations.
Despite decreasing emissions,[1,2] persistent chemicn>an class="Chemical">als
can remain in the aquatic ecosystem for decades (legacy pollutants)[3] because they bind physicochemically to sediment.[4] Changing bio-physicochemical conditions can render
pollutants bioavailable again to let them re-initiate adverse effects
on aquatic organisms.[5,6] Thus, sediment “quality”
is crucial to the health of an aquatic ecosystem.[7,8]
As a combination of species from different trophic levels and effect
endpoints characterizes an ecosystem’s resilience,[9−11] bioassays/test batteries for daphnia, algae, midge larvae, or bacteria[12,13] are common to establish a weight of evidence approaches for sediment
quality. Toxic effects vary not only between organisms and life stages[14,15] but also due to differences in exposure regimes and sediment properties:
one can use the solution as extracted from sediment[16] to evaluate “dissolved” contaminants or exposure
to whole sediment to elucidate more integrated effects.A variety
of chemometric methods attempt to expn>lain the observed effects[17−19] and have shown that toxicity often does not relate to dry weight
pollutant concentration.[20] Establishing
dose–effect relationships with data from field studies is more
difficult than that from spiking with single chemicals. Testing may
not agree with field observations at all.[21,22] Many interactions between sediment constituents can attenuate or
amplify toxic effects, more so than for surface water, which hampers
selection of a proper dose metric.[23] Relations
between bioassays and physicochemical constituents of sediment in
the field are scarce, and quantitative predictions based thereon are
elusive.Among recent progress,[24−27] insight into the extent of additional
available binding capacity via sediment properties allowed correct
identification of toxicity.[28] Both the
apparent bioavailability and toxicity relate to chemical speciation.
Speciation is the quantitative distribution of all chemical forms
of a compound over all possible phases, as a function of bio-physicochemical
properties of the endemic solution: pH, hardness, redox conditions,
and natural catalysts (clays, microorganisms). These factors vary
geographically.[29,30]The North Sea region has
a documented history in pollution linked to industrial (heavy metals,
acidification[31]) and agricultural (e.g.,
eutrophication) activities.[32−34] An extensive measurement campaign
by the Flemish Environmental Agency (VMM)[32] has existed in Flanders for approximately 20 years, gathering information
on pollutants in 1000+ sampling locations (e.g., metals, polycyclic
hydrocarbons), in conjunction with characteristics known to affect
speciation/bioavailability. Built hereon, models linked >60% of
the observed variance in Hyalella aztecamortality bioassays to heavy metals and NH3/NH4+.[35]Given the amount
of pollutants and sediments to be evaluated and monitored, bioassay(s)
should entail limited redundancy so as to capture the bulk of the
potential effects with minimum effort and cost.[36] Given their sensitivities, Chlorella vulgaris and Ceriodaphnia dubia may be suitable
to evaluate metals,[37] whereas Daphnia magna and Raphidocelis subcapitata may be more applicable to metallic/metal oxide nanomaterials.[38] For Flanders, the question would be: which causal
relationships between constituents of polluted sediment and ecotoxicological
effects allow us to prioritize or complement bioassays?Ostracod
microcrustaceans are keystone meiofauna species in production and
community metabolism of micro- or mesocosm freshwater beds.[39] Present in diverse freshwater benthic habitats
(ponds, lakes) in all continents, ostracods prove to be bioindicators
when other species fall short.[40] Many campaigns
entail tests with Heterocypris incongruens (seed shrimp).[41−44]H. incongruens is substantially more sensitive
than midge larvae[45] and comparably sensitive
(to heavy metals, NH4+) with H. azteca,[41] but H. incongruens growth is particularly sensitive.[39] As Flanders is an urbanized coastal (maritime)
and agricultural region, concentrations of organotins (antifouling
endocrine disruptors)[46−48] and phosphate[49,50] could be elevated and
particularly relevant for growth.Given the potentially higher
sensitivity of H. incongruens growth
to sediments in Flanders and its dissimilarity with other bioassays,
we set out to build a quantitative model for predicting ostracod growth
inhibition. Using extensive monitoring data in Flanders, we accounted
for bioavailability and chemical speciation to develop a predictive
model based on toxic unit (TU)[51] calculations
linking concentration to effect. We predict ostracod growth inhibition
with appreciable certainty, ∼90%. Our method underpins that
ostracods complement other bioindicators and supplements the existing
suite of models.
Materials and Methods
In the current sn>an class="Chemical">tudy, we quantitatively predict the growth inhibition
of H. incongruens as would be observed
when exposed to sediment. As an empirical exercise, we utilized the
results from bioassays as obtained from our Flemish VMM monitoring
campaign. Bioassays are detailed in Section and elsewhere.[45]
Input variables for our predictions were dry weight concentrations
of various chemicals. Following a recent study,[35] we considered heavy metals, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Given
exposure history, we also hypothesized local toxic effects by organotins.
As variables, we also used common sediment characteristics: pH, organic
carbon, clay, and the nitrogen status. Physicochemical sampling of
sediments and analytical methods are detailed in the Supporting Information
(Section S0) and elsewhere.[13,32] We describe the parametrization below (Sections –2.5).
Estimation of Ammonia and Phosphate in Sediment
Data
on aqueous concentrations of NH4+ and are either scattered,
unrepresentative, or their uncertainties are fairly high.[13,32,35] This is partially due to their
high mobilities. Therefore, we estimate and from the totalphosphorus, PTwith f being a ratio applied to totalP to distinguish for available fractions: a typical naturalwater
body (PT ∼23 or ∼30 mg/m3) constitutes 3 mg/m3 soluble + and usual ( + )/PT ratios of 1:10. Hence, fP=0.1.[52]In turn, we estimate NH4+ and NH3 concentrations
from the Kjeldahl nitrogen (KjN) and eq wherein fN is taken as the fraction of the KjN that is [NH4+] + [NH3], taken to
be 0.5(±0.1).[53,54] Exclusive for the data in West
Flanders (s = 1, else s = 0), we
applied a sinoid term with maximal amplitude (peak) in mid-march (d = 65)[55,56] to account for local seasonal
(agricultural) fluctuations[57,58] (S1). If the data adhering
to negative growth inhibition (Section ) did not entail KjN determination, we
applied the log-average of samples analyzed throughout Flanders. To
prevent bias, we excluded those sediments that we already selected
from curation (Section ).
Bioavailability
Toxicity is mn>an class="Chemical">ost often associated with the fraction of the chemical
that is freely bioavailable. Though test vessels contained sediment,[13,59] we had no information on burrowing behavior. We assumed that all
ostracods are exposed to chemicals in the water phase. From our campaign,
we obtained only the total sediment concentrations. Since those sediments
are applied to the (aqueous) bioassay, we estimate in situwater concentrations
from the total in sediment.
We converted sediment (sed) concentrations
to water (aq) concentrations via phase partitioning[60,61]wherein 0.2 represents
the sediment to test volume ratio (1:5[45]). Considering that the test medium is presn>an class="Chemical">cribed as moderately hard,[13] we took the value for the solids-to-water partitioning
coefficient KSW, local for NH4+/NH3 and H2PO4–/HPO42– to be 6.0(±3.0)[62−65] and 100 L/kg,[66,67] respectively, for field concentrations[64−66] representable for Flanders[13,32,35] and pH = 7.4.
The binding of metals is stronger in sediments
with increasing clay and organic carbon (OC),[68,69] creating a natural “bias”. Thus, we calculated KSW,local based on %clay and %OC content, analogous
to Bruijn and Denneman[70]wherein
we obtained the solid-water partition coefficient (KSW) from the literature,[60,71,72] representing a mix of speciation states. KSW values were assumed to represent 11% clay
and 5% OS.[13,68]a and b are the concentrations (mg/kg dissolved substances) of
metals per %clay and %OS, respectively, based on (log–log)
multiple linear regression (MLR) for the entire VMM (Flanders) data
set (N = 1762):Considering their hydrophobicity, we estimated KSW,local for organotins from their organic carbon
partition coefficients (KOC) and the %OC
content (varying 10 ≳ %OC ≳ 0.1[13,32]):Sediment and biota affect the in situ ionic
composition of the medium,[73,74] though the influence
of salinity[75,76] on organotin sorption is conflicting
(salting out vs. cation exchange). We also lacked information on the
relevant OC type.[75] Hence, we did not consider
influences of salinity and pH on KOC.
Instead, we applied log-normal averages for KOC values reported for fresh and marine sediments (Table ).
Table 1
Sorption Equilibrium Partitioning Coefficients
chemical
log KOC[75]
log KSW
ref
tetrabutyltin
5.5(±0.1)
4.2(±0.1)a
(75)
tributyltin
5.3(±0.1)
4.0(±0.1)a
(75)
dibutyltin
5.2(±0.2)
3.9(±0.2)a
(75)
monobutyltin
5.0(±0.2)
3.7(±0.2)a
(75)
triphenyltin
4.9(±0.1)
3.6(±0.2)a
(75)
diphenyltin
4.7(±0.2)
3.4(±0.2)a
(75)
monophenyltin
4.4(±0.3)
3.1(±0.2)a
(75)
NH4+/NH3
n/a
0.8b
(62, 65)
H2PO4–/HPO42–
n/a
2.0(±0.5)b
(66)
Cd
n/a
2.1a
(60)
Cr
n/a
2.5a
(60)
Cu
n/a
1.7a
(60)
Hg
n/a
2.2a
(60)
Ni
n/a
0.9a
(60)
Pb
n/a
2.8a
(60)
Zn
n/a
2.0a
(60)
Taken to represent sediments in Flanders with 5%
OC and 11% and clay.
Taken
for all sediments in Flanders.
Taken to represent sediments in Flanders with 5%
OC and 11% and clay.Taken
for pan class="Chemical">all sediments in Flanders.
Speciation
Toxicity is often the result
of a spn>ecific spn>eciation state of a chemicn>an class="Chemical">al; heavy metals, organotins,
phosphate, and ammonia are subject to adopt different speciation.
Thus, we describe explicitly the influence of the (bio)chemical properties
of the endemic solution.
Phosphate may act both as a toxicant[49] and a nutrient,[50] whereas n>an class="Chemical">organotins and ammonium are toxicants. Prominently, the
fraction of nonionized ammonium often relates to observed toxicity.[77] The species (de)protonate according toWe thus determine their speciation via Henderson–Hasselbalch[78]wherein pKa(XH = NH4+) = 9.25 and pKa(XH = ) = 7.2. We took the pKa values for organotins from the literature
(Table ).
Table 2
Proton Dissociation Constant (pKa) Valuesa
name
formula
pKa
ref
tetrabutyltinhydroxide
Sn(By)4
n/a
n/a
tributyltinhydroxide
cation
(Sn(OH2))+(By)3
6.25
(79−81)
dibutyltinhydroxide cation
(Sn(OH2)1)+(OH)1(By)2
5.1(±0.2)
(82)
monobutyltinhydroxide cation
(Sn(OH2)1)+(OH)2(By)1
5.9(±0.1)
(82)
triphenyltinhydroxide cation
Sn(OH2)+(Ph)3
5.2
(79, 81, 83)
diphenyltinhydroxide cation
(Sn(OH2)1)+(OH)1(Ph)2
4.0
(84)b
monophenyltinhydroxide cation
(Sn(OH2)1)+(OH)2(Ph)1
4.8
**c
dihydrogenphosphate
H2PO4–
7.2
n/a
ammonia
NH4+
9.25
n/a
See Table S2 for full details. By = butyl; Ph = phenyl.
In 75% dioxane–water
solution. pKa values of ligands in 75%
dioxane–water solutions are higher than those reported in water.[84]
Double
asterisks mean an estimation assuming the substitution of butyl by
phenyl has a constant effect on pKa: pKa MPT = pKa MBT – ((pKa TBT – pKa TPT) + ( pKa DBT – pKa DPT)/2).
See Table S2 for full details. By = butyl; pan class="Chemical">Ph = phenyl.
In 75% dioxane–n>an class="Chemical">water
solution. pKa values of ligands in 75%
dioxane–water solutions are higher than those reported in water.[84]
Double
asterisks mean an estimation assuming the substitution of butyl by
phenyl has a constant effect on pKa: pKa Mn>an class="Chemical">PT = pKa MBT – ((pKa TBT – pKa TPT) + ( pKa DBT – pKa DPT)/2).
Crn>an class="Disease">toxicity relates to the presence
of CrO42–[85,86] via microbial
(nitrification,[87−89] eutrophication[33]) and
redox processes:[90] [CrO42–] correlates with [NO3–] and pH[91] due to (bio)chemical reactionsBecause KSW(Cr3+) ≫ KSW(), the total sediment Cr concentration
is dominated by [Cr3+], i.e., Thus, based on eqs and 13, we characterized
the ratio between and Cr3+ empirically via[35]wherein we take on average
to be 4.13% of totalCr[91] and c, d, e, and f are
regression coefficients[35] (Figure S4). Since KSW of CrVI (<1–50 L/kg) ≫ Crlll (850–5600 L/kg),[92] ∼90%
of aqueous Cr is .
Median Effect Concentrations (EC50)
With the exception of n>an class="Chemical">Cr and Sn, we assumed that the total concentration
of metals is equal to a single free valent (uncomplexed) M2+ oxidation state, as the sole contributor to the observed toxicity.
We assume that Cr expresses toxicity only via the CrO42– form (Table ).
Table 3
H. incongruens Effect Level Concentrations of Chemicals from the Open Literaturea
chemical
effect (EC50) concentration (ng/L)
effect
(EC50) concentration (ng/L cation)b
ref
tetrabutyltin
50
n/a
Table S3
tributyltinhydroxide
50
3.5
Table S3
dibutyltinhydroxide
50
0.3
Table S3
monobutyltinhydroxide
50
1.6
Table S3
triphenyltinhydroxide
50
0.3
Table S3
diphenyltinhydroxide
50
0.02
Table S3
monophenyltinhydroxide
50
0.1
Table S3
Cu2+
950,000
n/a
(95)
Ni2+
2500,000
n/a
(95)
Hg2+
400,000
n/a
(95)
Zn2+
14,775,880
n/a
(95)
Cd2+
70,000
n/a
(95)
CrO42–c
4,310,000
n/a
(95)
Pb2+
39,200,000
n/a
(95)
NH3
2000
140,000d
(96, 97)
HPO42–/H2PO4–
3,905,460,000
2,000,000,000e
(49)
The values for organotins are the means from hatching, developmental,
growth, and mortality experiments with varying durations (4 to 28
days); details are shown in Table S3.
Assuming pH = 7.4.
Since dichromate hydrolyzes in water
(Cr2O72– + H2O
⇌ 2 CrO42– + 2H+),
we multiplied EC50 by 2.
Represents NH3.
Represents HPO42–.
The values for n>an class="Chemical">organotins are the means from hatching, developmental,
growth, and mortality experiments with varying durations (4 to 28
days); details are shown in Table S3.
Assuming pH = 7.4.Since dichromate hydrolyzes in n>an class="Chemical">water
(Cr2O72– + H2O
⇌ 2 CrO42– + 2H+),
we multiplied EC50 by 2.
Represents pan class="Chemical">NH3.
Represents pan class="Chemical">HPO42–.
In contrast to uncomplexed heavy
metals (Table ), to
our knowledge, there are no 6 day EC50 values available for H. incongruens growth when exposed to organotins,
NH3, or H2PO4–/HPO42–. Since we assumed all H. incongruens to reside in the water layer, we screened
the literature for aqueous phase EC50 values for related species/studies.
Though tributylated organotin is generally more toxic than other organotins,[93,94] to our knowledge, there is no information on the (relative) H. incongruens toxicity due to substituents.Based on Table S3, we initially estimated
(based on log-averages) the EC50 of (neutrn>an class="Chemical">al) organotins, NH3, and HPO42– for H. incongruens growth to be 50, 2000, and 2,000,000,000 ng/L (Table ), respectively.
Toxic Unit (TU)
Initial Approximation
The TU estimates mixn>an class="Chemical">ture-toxicity risks to both terrestrial and aquatic communities.[8] We assessed the total exposure from the sediment
by summing the exposures for all of the contaminants (eq )[98]wherein n reflects the number of
pollutants i, taken as heavy metals, organotins,
NH3, and H2PO4–/HPO42–.
For the current purpn>an class="Chemical">ose,
it was not feasible to parametrize a priori the toxic interaction
between chemicals based on their EC50 values only (i.e., without SSD
shape parameters).[51,99] Taking γ = 1 reflects all chemicals to have a similar mode of action
(MoA) and negligible interaction between chemicals. As the simple
response addition (RA) method does not necessarily produce better
results than concentration addition (CA),[35]eq produces an
“educated guess” for the TU of H. incongruens.
Calibration
Assuming a logistic
distribution of sensitivities toward the polluted sediment, we described
the percentage of growth inhibited as a function of expn>osure via a
cumulative logistic distribution function[98]wherein β is a steepness function and TU is initially the ratio
of the measured (bioavailable) chemical concentration [C]aq to its effect concentration [EC50]aq.[100] Fitting mortalities with these TU values (Section ) produced
suboptimal results (Figure A; Figures S5, S7).
Figure 3
H. incongruens growth inhibition (%) versus the toxic
unit. GI = growth inhibition. (A) EC50 for organotins (cations) represented
3 ng/L; pH assumed to be 7.5. R2 = 0.26.
(B) EC50 for organotins (cations) represented 0.003 ng/L (eq ); pH assumed to be 7.5. R2 = 0.82. (C) EC50 for organotins (cations)
represented 0.003 ng/L(eq ); pH taken for the porewater. R2 = 0.90.
To acquire
statistically better predictions based on the expn>lained variance,
we n>an class="Chemical">allowed variation in EC50 values to fit the growth inhibition data
(Section ) via eq . This was done via the
factor γ in eq . The preselected range for γ was 1000. The fitting implies the average TU
fixed at the exposure for which 50% of the growth is inhibited. We
envisioned potential divergences between values for γEC50 and EC50 to be the result of unknown testing
procedures and conditions altering speciation, bioavailability (e.g.,
metals as oxides or organometals), or MoAs. Final γEC50 values are given in Figure .
Figure 2
H. incongruens growth inhibition (%) versus the toxic unit. EC50 for organotin
cations was taken to be 0.003 ng/L, representing By3SnOH2+. Simulation was performed using β = 4.5
(unitless). The far-left triangle denotes the weighted average of
values with log TU < −1. Squares denote data wherefore KjN
was unknown and taken as a regional average (Section ). The table provides corresponding uncertainties/ranges.
For EC50 values, the errors are those carried over from errors in
bioavailabilities.
Bioassay
Description and Data Curation
We calibrate and test our methods
(eqs –16) using data on whole-sediment toxicity assessed
by VMM via laboratory bioassays performed on the ostracod H. incongruens, a small benthic freshwatercrustacean.
The data represents a 6 day growth inhibition test (ISO 14371[101]) with freshly (≤52 h old) hatched cysts
(i.e., neonates, with lengths of 150–250 μm) incubated
at 25(±1) °C, in darkness. Details are shown elsewhere.[45,102] The percentage % of growth inhibition μ because of exposure
to sediment is defined[45] aswhere the lengths are the averages of a total of 60
organisms distributed across six replicates. The reference refers
to a standard sand. For the reference, lengthday6, reference ≥ 1.5·lengthday0 and mortality is ≤20%.
To enlarge our modeling domain, we specifically included also bioassays
reporting negative growth inhibition (i.e., growth stimulation).Since the bioassay is aerobic, it should represent aerobic sediments
in the field. This implies minimizing speciation-related changes due
to in situ anaerobic–aerobic transformations. Also, previous
O2 deprivation in the field may create bias for germination/growth
(chemicalcues) at the start of the bioassay: crustaceans are sensitive
to O2 deprivation;[103,104] low O2 induces
dormancy (HOEC = 5.5 mgO2/L).[104] Taking 44 ± 4 mg/L and 0.21 as solubility (T ≈ 20 °C) and partial pressure, respectively, this amounts
to 60 ± 5% O2. H. incongruens does not tolerate acidic conditions.[39]Therefore, we exclude all assays for which the field poren>an class="Chemical">waterO2 < 65%, O2 ≥ 100%, and pH ≤
6.5, which we consider nonrepresentable sediments.
Results
We performed analyses to elucidate the toxicity
of sediments in Flanders to H. incongruens. According to initialTU results (Figures S5, S7), NH3 (TU = 0.1) contributed most to H. incongruens growth inhibition. Other contributors
were Ni and Cu (TUs ≤ 0.1), whereas the individualTUs of Zn,
Cd, CrO4, Hg, and Pb were ≤0.01. Predicting the
% growth inhibition via initialTU using initial (standard) EC50 values
(Table , Section ) yielded
maximal explained variance lower than 30%. Initially, speciation calculations
(eqs , 14) did not appear to improve these results. In contrast to Figure S7 (wherein there is a low contribution),
organotins are among the species most highly correlating with H. incongruens % growth inhibition (Figure S9).We then performed “semiempirical”
analyses to further elucidate the toxicity of sediments by letting
γEC50 values fit the growth inhibition
data (Section ). This “calibrating” procedure allowed a robust TU
analysis for H. incongruens. According
to the semiempirical analysis, too, NH3 dominates the TU
(TU = 0.3). Additional toxic pressure arises from organotins (as represented
by tributyltin, TU = 0.3). Then, the contributions from Ni and Cu
appear minor (≤0.1) (Figure ). Inclusion of chemicals other than NH3, HPO42–, and By3SnOH2 only marginally improved the fit. Instead, we found a positive
influence by HPO42–, i.e., growth-promoting
(TU = −0.3).
Figure 1
Toxic units for H. incongruens ([C]aq/EC50aq) for individual pollutants in
sediments from water bodies in Flanders. Table denotes EC50aq values for free
metals; Figure denotes
EC50 values for NH3, By3SnOH2+, and H2PO4/HPO4, contrasting
ranges in Table .
Hence, the TUs may be both underestimations/overestimations. Error
bars denote variability throughout Flanders. For MFT (PhSn(OH)2OH2+), assuming porewater (pH = 7.5),
99% of samples were below the detection limit (DL); negative errors
are 10-fold the SD including the values set at the DL.
Toxic units for H. incongruens ([C]aq/EC50aq) for individual pollutants in
sediments from water bodies in Flanders. Table denotes EC50aq values for free
metals; Figure denotes
EC50 values for NH3, By3SnOH2+, and H2PO4/HPO4, contrasting
ranges in Table .
Hence, the TUs may be both underestimations/overestimations. Error
bars denote variability throughout Flanders. For MFT (PhSn(OH)2OH2+), assuming porewater (pH = 7.5),
99% of samples were below the detection limit (DL); negative errors
are 10-fold the SD including the values set at the DL.After calibration, we found that spn>eciation cn>an class="Chemical">alculations
(eq ) significantly
improved the results (Figure B,C). Then, NH3, organotins, and HPO42– explain up to 90% of the observed variance in
the % growth inhibition for water bodies throughout Flanders. We established
γEC50 values for NH3, HPO42–, and TBT cation (By3SnOH2+) at 150,000–39,000 and 0.003
ng/L. The relative importance of the toxicants differs between water
bodies. In general, there is a higher toxic pressure in West Flanders
than in inland regions (Table S4). In general,
predictions for H. incongruens growth
inhibition are more precise for “uniform” (e.g., large
rivers and canals) water bodies than for small “nonuniform”
water bodies.
Discussion
For sediments
in Flanders, we report a maximum growth of H. incongruens of 56% (Supporting Information). The
curated data depict a leveling (for low toxicant concentrations) between
0 and −40% (Figure ). In comparison, H. incongruens grows in unpolluted soft and hard water (pH = 7) with 0.063(±0.003)
and 0.072(±0.003) mm/day, respectively.[105] Assuming linear growth, this amounts to 84(±42)% in 6 days,
similar to sediments in Flanders with “low” toxicant
concentrations. This indicates toxic pressure to H.
incongruens in the majority of bioassays on sediments
from Flanders.We explain up to 90% of the variance in H. incongruens growth. The standard error of model
prediction (Figure ) is lower than that of a similar model for H. azteca.[35] This is likely related to a better
defined testing system and lower physical or metabolic complexity
of the organism.[13,45] Predictions appear more precise
for neonate growth than for survival (Figures S9, S13), similar to earlier observations.[96] A coefficient of variation of 6–20% was reported
using parallel mortality assays.[106] Thus,
the contribution of other toxicants, erroneous speciation/bioavailability,
or mixture effects to the residual variance (∼10%, Figure ) is limited. 10-fold intraspecies uncertainty factors are
widely used;[107] our prediction errors are
well within this margin.H. incongruens growth inhibition (%) versus the toxic unit. EC50 for n>an class="Chemical">organotin
cations was taken to be 0.003 ng/L, representing By3SnOH2+. Simulation was performed using β = 4.5
(unitless). The far-left triangle denotes the weighted average of
values with log TU < −1. Squares denote data wherefore KjN
was unknown and taken as a regional average (Section ). The table provides corresponding uncertainties/ranges.
For EC50 values, the errors are those carried over from errors in
bioavailabilities.
The average toxic pressure
for H. incongruens is comparable to
that for H. azteca.[35] Both initial and calibrated TU analyses support our hypotheses
that NH3, along with heavy metals, dominates the effects
on H. incongruens. Meanwhile, in contrast
to H. azteca,[35] CrO42– did not appear to contribute
to the apparent toxicity. The analysis also shows that the mixture
of organotins, NH3, and HPO42– acts distinctly toward H. incongruens. We interpreted this partially as a bioconcentration effect, which
we will explain stepwise below. From its distinct sensitivity and
the 90% explained variance, we deem the H. incongruens sediment contact test to be a complementary bioassay to evaluate
sediment and water quality.
Organotins
Ni
and Cu seemed to only marginn>an class="Chemical">ally inhibit growth (TUs ≤ 0.1),
though heavy metal loading as low as 100 μg/kg affecting aquatic
species is generally accepted.[108] Organotins,
as characterized by TBT, appear significantly more toxic to H. incongruens than to similar aquatic species in
single-substance tests (Figure , Table S3). This is on average
a factor of 1000, irrespective of speciation. In other words, the
term γTBT in eq is ∼1 × 10–3. Metals
react with receptors, enzymes, DNA, protein and lipids or produce
structural and functional changes resulting in toxic damage. The toxicant
can be a derivative of the parent metal or reactive species (ROS or
RNS) from (bio)transformations.
The correlation between TBT
cation concentrations and growth inhibition is stronger than for the
neutrn>an class="Chemical">alTBT (Figure B,C; Figure S10). Since H. incongruens is small,
the internal (e.g., cytoplasmic) pH may be correlated to medium/porewater
pH.[109,110] This indicates that growth inhibition is
associated with the cation. In contrast, organotintoxicity toward
yeast increases with cations < hydroxides < chlorides.[111] From pH 5.8 to 8.0, the KOW of TBT and TPT increased.[112,113] As it partitions
into the lipid fraction of the biomembrane, the neutral (hydrophobic)
form is more bioavailable:[114] uptake and
bioconcentration of TBT are higher at pH 8.0 (where neutralTBTOH
predominates) than at pH 5.0–6.0.[115]
H. incongruens growth inhibition (%) versus the toxic
unit. GI = growth inhibition. (A) EC50 for n>an class="Chemical">organotins (cations) represented
3 ng/L; pH assumed to be 7.5. R2 = 0.26.
(B) EC50 for organotins (cations) represented 0.003 ng/L (eq ); pH assumed to be 7.5. R2 = 0.82. (C) EC50 for organotins (cations)
represented 0.003 ng/L(eq ); pH taken for the porewater. R2 = 0.90.
However, biomembrane–water
distribution of the n>an class="Chemical">TBT cation exceeds liposome–water distribution,
and distribution of the TBT cation exceeds that of the neutral hydroxo-complex.
This relates to the cation complexing with ligands and proteins.[114] This indicates that the high sensitivity of H. incongruens growth on organotin as compared to
other aquatic species (Figure ; Table S2) does not arise from
nonpolar (baseline) narcosis.[116] In turn,
this implies interactions between the TBT cation and proteins with
growth regulation activity.[117]
Endocrine
activity of TBT in crustaceans refers to the interactions with the
ecdysteroid receptor–retinoid-X receptor dimer (CrcEcR-CrcRXR)
complex:[48,117,118] TBT binds
in the electrostatic and neutral areas of CrcRXR.[117] The ecdysone (nuclear) receptor is responsible for transcriptional
regulation of molting,[119] which is critical
for growth of crustaceans accumulating (i.e., “feeding on”)
phosphate and carbonate. Interaction with vitellogenin and cuticular
proteins may cause a second endocrine disruption on the Y-organ–ecdysteroidal
endocrine axis and impair growth.[117]
Phosphate
In contrast to toxicity (γPO > 0), phosphate appears to promote H. incongruens growth (γPO < 0) (eq ). The apparent effect level is ∼0.04 mg/L, far lower than
levels causing toxicity (∼2000 mg/L[49]). Given the aqueous concentration of phosphate in the bioassays,
0.02–2 mg/L, and an LC50 value of approximately 3900 mg/L,[49] toxicity of HPO42– to H. incongruens is negligible. H. incongruens is one of the only two ostracods wherefore
Ca2+positively correlates with its natural abundance;
Ca2+ associates with phosphate.[120] P content of the carapace differs geographically.[39]Prior to molting, ostracods store CaHPO4 (apatite) granules and chitin precursors in epidermal cells. The
granules expulse their content, which is transformed into platelets
of CaCO3, disintegrated to amorphous calcite and, ultimately,
crystals to build the carapace.[121] Note
that HCO3– is not a limiting factor (relatively
constant) since it is added via the synthetic medium.[45] The carapace may need ∼7 days to complete its calcification,
via up to nine growth stages (instars).[50]We find a higher correlation for HPO42– than for n>an class="Chemical">H2PO4– (Figure B,C; Figure S11). Indeed, an alkaline environment
(high pH) accelerates tissue calcification.[122,123] Moreover, calcium phosphatecrystallinity decreases with an increase
in reaction pH,[123,124] and solubilities decrease with
increasing pH.[125] The combined results
indicate that phosphate in bioassays performed with sediments from
Flanders, in the HPO42– form, promotes H. incongruens growth.
Ammonia
Whereas we initially assigned an EC50 value for NH3 of
0.002 mg/L, we found an empirical value for γNHEC50 of 0.15 mg/L (implying γNH > 1) (eq ). In
analogy, the LC50 value for H. azteca exposed to NH3 is 2–5 mg/L,[78,126] whereas in bioassays, it appears empirically to be 5000 mg/L.[35] The average TU of NH4+/NH3 is 0.3 across Flanders, and NH3 explains
30% of the variance in growth inhibition. We noted a relatively high
toxicity of sediments from West Flanders (e.g., Yser river) collected
during (fertilization[56] in) spring; levels
of NH4+/KjN in the Yser are structurally high
(Table S4); anaerobic conditions are more
likely for those sediments.We found a slightly higher correlation
for NH3 than for n>an class="Chemical">NH4+ (Figure B,C; Figure S12). Aquatic ecotoxicity studies in the 1990s identified NH4+/NH3 (esp. NH3) as a contributing
cause.[127] More so than NH4+, NH3 can pass through biological surfaces into
tissue fluid. When pH of the tissue fluid is lower than that of the
surrounding water, NH3 can disrupt ionoregulatory functions.[49,128] In addition, NH3 may activate N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in the brain,[129] leading to intoxication.
Mixture Effects
The γEC50 values for n>an class="Chemical">HPO42–, NH3,
and organotin used for the analysis differed from the initial estimation
(Table ; Figure ). With respect to
literature EC50 values, much variation exists (Table S3); the values obtained represent extreme values. Thus,
the extreme γEC50 values may not only represent a direct mode of toxic action from HPO42–, NH3, and organotin individually but also suggest toxicity as
the result of interaction(s) between them, i.e., γ ≠ 1 (see eq ).
There are many documented interactions between
n>an class="Chemical">P, N, and metals.[130] However, models (e.g.,
the TU, eq ) often
describe toxicity additively or independently,[98] i.e., not including synergistic/antagonistic mixture effects.[131] Mixture toxicity entails detailed description
of the interactions between sediment fractions and chemicals: depending
on numerous conditions, metals form organic complexes or oxides, each
with its own characteristic influence on the intoxication pathway.
Phosphorus–Tin Interaction
Though phosphorus
can be toxic,[132] it can diminish n>an class="Chemical">metaltoxicity via precipitation.[133] Phosphate
is a polydentate ligand forming negatively charged complexes with
triorganotins mono- and dimers;[73,134] organotin is 102–105 times more selective toward phosphate
than toward other oxoanions[135] and aids
in its extraction.[136] In fact, extraction
of organotins from sediment co-extracts phosphorus compounds.[137] Plants absorb phosphate; ostracods feed on
dead/living plants. Thus, the influence of sediment’s organic
phosphate on the distribution of TBT in ostracods may relate to dietary
assimilation via periphyton.[120,130] Acute toxicity of
TPT on ostracods may be supplemented by elimination of food.[138]
Prominently, H. incongruens accumulates HPO42–, hence TBT, via
molting (Section ). Additionally, the TPT+ cation sorbs onto liposomes
via complex formation with phospholipids.[114] Guanosine-5-monophosphate (G-5-MP) most efficiently forms a competitive
organotin complex;[139] as an essential enzyme
for cell growth, G-5-MP kinase converts GMP to GDP. Combined, the
interactions with phosphate compounds indicate an effective bioconcentration
larger than based on the thermodynamic (hydrophobic) maximum ((1)
in Figure ). Reported
BCFs for species (e.g., bivalves) capable of accumulating phosphate
are ∼1000 times larger than those without the capability.[81,140] This value matches with 1/γTBT, insinuating a similar
TMoA:
Figure 4
Simplified
schematic of interactions between sediment constituents affecting
bioassay toxicity. Green and red arrows denote positive and negative
effects on H. incongruens growth, respectively.
According to de Deckere et al.,[13] O2 ought to remain ≥60% during bioassays.
Simplified
schematic of interactions between sediment constituents affecn>an class="Chemical">ting
bioassay toxicity. Green and red arrows denote positive and negative
effects on H. incongruens growth, respectively.
According to de Deckere et al.,[13] O2 ought to remain ≥60% during bioassays.
Nitrogen–Tin Interaction
Since the bioassays are aerobic,[45,102] NH3/n>an class="Chemical">NH4 may be converted to NO2–/NO3– (Figure ), which would be enhanced by bioturbation.[74] Conversion to NO3–[35] could contribute to the high apparent
γEC50 value of NH3 (Figure ). Though affecting ostracods,[141−143] NO3– is likely not directly toxic.[35,144] Instead, metal-nitrates are well-soluble, hence bioavailable.[145] Heavy metals may influence nitrification.[88,146] In turn, nitrification and volatilization (NH4+ → NH3(↑) + H+) affect pH. Changes
in pH in sediment/ecotoxicity tests are reported;[35,147] we cannot assume that buffering was consistent.
Surplus H+ increases the cation concentration and interactions of the
n>an class="Chemical">TBTmetal-type behavior by complex formation with ligands in phospholipids
and proteins,[48,148] illustrated by (2) in Figure . NO3– and SO42– (also in the
EPA medium) may solubilize organotins. In addition, the relative concentrations
of NH4 and metals may influence uncoupling of mitochondrial
oxidative phosphorylation.[149]
Limitations, Recommendations, and Outlook
Sorption
to varying organic carbon did not appear to strengthen correlations
(eq ). Apart from those
considered here, other sediment constituents (e.g., Al, Mg, Ca, S)
affect speciation and bioavailability.[30,150] Prominently,
acid-volatile sulfide (AVS)[20,69] relates to invertebrate
toxicity.[85,86,151] We can determine
bioavailability more comprehensively by distinguishing sediment fractions
(e.g., humic acid[75]) and binding mechanisms,[152] pending available data.[75,153]Section S3 contains a more complete discussion
of limitations. Despite increased monitoring,[13] it is laborious to measure all such relevant parameters, which depend
on the sediment/organism. Even if we have such direct detailed information,
it is difficult to describe all interactions explicitly.[154−156] We therefore ought to consider also (semi)empirical- and evidence-based
approaches.Based on the current study, we argue for an approach
based on (bio)chemical interactions between NH4+, organotins, and HPO42–. Incomplete
monitoring data for N or P might obscure or underestimate ostracod
toxicities.[35] Since phosphate was not present
in reference sediments, this may obscure the toxic effect on the ostracods.
Thus, we propose to standardize totalphosphorus (i.e., phosphate)
in the sediment bioassays. Prediction of ostracod growth is probably
more straightforward than that of mortality, which relates to, e.g.,
complexity of the toxic mode of action. Due to the higher sensitivity
of juveniles, we recommend using the neonate test or making age-based
extrapolations. BCF tests should elucidate the validity of eq .Pollutants are
not always (directly) measured, which would be important for remote
(small) water bodies where an “exotic” chemical may
skew localtoxicity. More direct data for NH4/PO4 may help to solidify the relationships.[35,157,158] Large, uniform water bodies
are less susceptible to pressures from point releases of chemicals
(dilution). Higher temperature and drought (concentrating pollutants)
may influence (bio)transformation, O2 uptake, and elevate
toxicity.[159] This determines parametrization,
representability, and implementability of models. We may optimize
via identifying “hotspot” locations, e.g., bridges/harbors.[160] Concentrations of organotins appear to decrease
over time in sediment in Flanders. Removal mechanisms include leaching
into sea or biodegradation (Figure S3; Figure ), which need to
be elucidated.
Figure 5
First-order disappearance rate constant for TBT in Flemish
sediment (x, in year–1) versus
salinity and concentration (y1 and y2). Symbols denote distinct sampling locations, having a uniform
temporal trend in concentration (continuously increasing or continuously
decreasing).
First-order disappearance rate constant for TBT in Flemish
sediment (x, in year–1) versus
sn>an class="Chemical">alinity and concentration (y1 and y2). Symbols denote distinct sampling locations, having a uniform
temporal trend in concentration (continuously increasing or continuously
decreasing).
In this study, we have applied
expn>licit descriptions to characterize the speciation and bioavailability
of pollutants in ostracod bioassays performed using sediments from
Flanders. Semiempirical toxic unit analyses elucidated the effects
of heavy metals (esp. organotin) and ammonia inhibiting H. incongruens growth. Based on standard approaches,
26% of the variance in the observed effect could be explained. Yet,
by acknowledging speciation and interactions between bioassay constituents,
we can explain up to 90%. Organotin and ammonia appear more and less
toxic, respectively, than what is reported in the existing literature
for controlled (single-substance) laboratory tests. We can attribute
this to a cascade of bio-physicochemical interactions affecting speciation
and transformations of the chemicals in situ. Prominently, organotins
appear to bioaccumulate during the molting process of H. incongruens. Future modeling ought to focus on
the factors controlling the interactions, via more explicit measurement
and monitoring of speciation and bioavailability. This is likely to
help in bridging the gap between laboratory and field tests so as
to enable a more reliable risk assessment for sediments. Despite the
need for further study, we deem our model a worthwhile complementary
method to evaluate sediments in Flanders. Applying the approach to
more spatiotemporal and geochemical settings[11,161] will evaluate its broader applicability. Thus, we deem it a starting
point for more integrated ecotoxicity modeling in general.
Authors: David F Raikow; David F Reid; Ernest R Blatchley; Gregory Jacobs; Peter F Landrum Journal: Environ Toxicol Chem Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.742
Authors: Danielly de Paiva Magalhães; Mônica Regina da Costa Marques; Darcilio Fernandes Baptista; Daniel Forsin Buss Journal: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf Date: 2014-09-07 Impact factor: 6.291
Authors: Sunghwan Kim; Paul A Thiessen; Evan E Bolton; Jie Chen; Gang Fu; Asta Gindulyte; Lianyi Han; Jane He; Siqian He; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Jiyao Wang; Bo Yu; Jian Zhang; Stephen H Bryant Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 16.971