Literature DB >> 33134899

Naturally Acquired Rift Valley Fever Virus Neutralizing Antibodies Predominantly Target the Gn Glycoprotein.

Daniel Wright1,2, Elizabeth R Allen3, Madeleine H A Clark4, John N Gitonga1, Henry K Karanja1, Ruben J G Hulswit3, Iona Taylor2, Sumi Biswas2, Jennifer Marshall2, Damaris Mwololo5, John Muriuki5, Bernard Bett5, Thomas A Bowden3, George M Warimwe1,6.   

Abstract

Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a viral hemorrhagic disease first discovered in Kenya in 1930. Numerous animal studies have demonstrated that protective immunity is acquired following RVF virus (RVFV) infection and that this correlates with acquisition of virus-neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) that target the viral envelope glycoproteins. However, naturally acquired immunity to RVF in humans is poorly described. Here, we characterized the immune response to the viral envelope glycoproteins, Gn and Gc, in RVFV-exposed Kenyan adults. Long-lived IgG (dominated by IgG1 subclass) and T cell responses were detected against both Gn and Gc. However, antigen-specific antibody depletion experiments showed that Gn-specific antibodies dominate the RVFV nAb response. IgG avidity against Gn, but not Gc, correlated with nAb titers. These data are consistent with the greater level of immune accessibility of Gn on the viral envelope surface and confirm the importance of Gn as an integral component for RVF vaccine development.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunology; Virology

Year:  2020        PMID: 33134899      PMCID: PMC7588868          DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  iScience        ISSN: 2589-0042


Introduction

Rift Valley fever (RVF) is one of several epidemic diseases prioritized by the World Health Organization and other global organizations for urgent research and development of control interventions (Mehand et al., 2018; Gouglas et al., 2018). The disease was first described in Kenya in 1930, but RVF epidemics are now commonly reported in Africa and the Arabian Peninsula (CDC, 2020). RVF is caused by the mosquito-borne Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), a single-stranded RNA Phlebovirus in the Phenuiviridae family (ICTV, 2020). The virus primarily infects ruminants resulting in high rates of neonatal mortality and abortion that translate to major economic losses in the livestock industry of affected countries. Zoonotic transmission to humans most commonly occurs during livestock epizootics through infectious mosquito bites or direct contact with tissue or fluid from infected animals (Daubney et al., 1931; Nicholas et al., 2014). A wide spectrum of clinical manifestations characterize RVF in humans, including self-limiting mild illness associated with fever, myalgia, and other non-specific symptoms, through to hemorrhagic and neurological manifestations with high case fatality and debilitating sequela (reviewed in Wright et al., 2019) and possible miscarriage in pregnant women (Baudin et al., 2016; Adam and Karsany, 2008; Arishi et al., 2006). No therapeutics or vaccines are currently approved for human use, although several candidate vaccines are in development (Gouglas et al., 2018). RVFV contains a tripartite genome consisting of a small (S), medium (M), and large (L) segment (Wright et al., 2019). The S segment encodes the nucleoprotein (N) and a non-structural protein (NSs). The L segment encodes the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. The M segment encodes the structural glycoproteins, Gn and Gc. These two glycoproteins form heterodimers arranged into higher order pentamers and hexamers that encapsulate the mature virion and are responsible for host-cell attachment and membrane fusion (Halldorsson et al., 2018; Freiberg et al., 2008; Sherman et al., 2009; Huiskonen et al., 2009). They are the prime targets of neutralizing antibodies. Through the use of alternative translation sites and post-translational cleavage, the M segment also encodes for a non-structural protein (NSm) and a 78 kDa protein, which may play a structural role in virus derived from mosquito cells (Weingartl et al., 2014). Historical seminal studies in livestock and non-human primates demonstrated that immunity to RVF is acquired following recovery from RVFV infection and that this can be passively transferred to susceptible animals through administration of convalescent sera (Peters et al., 1988; Daubney et al., 1931). These studies identified viral neutralizing antibodies (nAbs), which target the RVFV Gn and Gc envelope glycoproteins, as the main correlates of protection against RVF (Easterday, 1965). Occupational exposure to RVFV infection during the decades following the discovery of RVFV provided the first evidence of naturally acquired RVFV nAbs and these tended to be long-lived, being readily detectable in two individuals 12 and 25 years post-infection, respectively, despite no further exposure (Smithburn et al., 1949; Brown et al., 1957; Findlay, 1936). However, beyond these studies, naturally acquired immunity to RVFV in humans is poorly described. Here, we sought to address this paucity of information by characterizing the humoral and cellular response to RVFV among naturally exposed adults in Kenya, including an investigation of the longevity and kinetics of RVFV nAbs in this population.

Results

Stored samples from two adult populations in coastal Kenya were used for this study (see Methods). One population of adults comprised a random selection of fifty RVFV-exposed individuals included in a previous cross-sectional survey investigating the risk factors for RVFV exposure in Tana River county (Bett et al., 2018). The second population was composed of adults under longitudinal surveillance for malaria within the Kilifi Health and Demographic Surveillance System (KHDSS) (Scott et al., 2012) in Kilifi county and had previously not been screened for RVFV exposure (see Methods).

IgG Responses against Gn and Gc Correlate with RVFV nAb Levels

We first measured IgG antibody responses against Gn and Gc in fifty RVFV-exposed adults from Tana River county and assessed their relationship with the RVFV nAb response. The geometric mean titer (GMT) of RVFV nAb as measured by virus neutralizing assay (VNT50) in these fifty adults was approximately 2,100 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1,543–2,792) and ranged between ~160 and >14,000 (Figure 1). Total IgG titers against Gn and Gc (ELISA GMT of 67.3 for Gn and 66.9 for Gc) were highly correlated (r = 0.77, p < 0.001). A strong correlation was observed between the RVFV nAb titer and IgG response against Gn (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001) and Gc (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001) (Figure 1A). IgG1 subclass predominated the antibody response against both Gn and Gc (Figure 1C).
Figure 1

Total IgG Titer toward Recombinant Gn and Gc Correlate Strongly with Neutralizing Antibody Titer

(A) Correlations between neutralization titer, as measured by VNT50 assay, and total IgG titer toward Gn and Gc, as measured by ELISA (Gn: r = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60–0.86. Gc; r = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.49–0.81).∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, Spearman’s correlation.

(B) Correlations between neutralization titer and avidity of total IgG toward Gn and Gc (Gn: r = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.09–0.59, ∗∗; Gc: r = 0.08, 95% CI: −0.21–0.36, p = 0.57).∗∗p = 0.009, Spearman’s correlation.

(C) IgG subclass response toward Gn and Gc. Lines represent geometric means.

See also Figure S1 for recombinant protein expression.

Total IgG Titer toward Recombinant Gn and Gc Correlate Strongly with Neutralizing Antibody Titer (A) Correlations between neutralization titer, as measured by VNT50 assay, and total IgG titer toward Gn and Gc, as measured by ELISA (Gn: r = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60–0.86. Gc; r = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.49–0.81).∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, Spearman’s correlation. (B) Correlations between neutralization titer and avidity of total IgG toward Gn and Gc (Gn: r = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.09–0.59, ∗∗; Gc: r = 0.08, 95% CI: −0.21–0.36, p = 0.57).∗∗p = 0.009, Spearman’s correlation. (C) IgG subclass response toward Gn and Gc. Lines represent geometric means. See also Figure S1 for recombinant protein expression. We also measured the avidity of the antibody response to each glycoprotein, expressing this as the concentration of NaSCN, a chaotropic agent, required to reduce ELISA signal by 50% (NaSCN IC50). Anti-Gc antibody avidity was significantly higher than that for anti-Gn antibodies (Figure 1B); however, a correlation between antibody avidity and nAb response was only observed for Gn (r = 0.37, p = 0.009) and not Gc (r = 0.08, p = 0.57).

nAbs from Naturally Exposed Adults Preferentially Target RVFV Gn over Gc

We next investigated the relative contribution of Gn and Gc to the RVFV nAb response. To do this, we pooled available sera from seven RVFV-exposed adults from Tana River county who had high titers (>300 anti-Gn and anti-Gc AU). We then depleted the pooled serum of antibodies specific for one or both of the recombinant RVFV glycoproteins (see Methods). ELISA was used to confirm the depletion, showing a reduction in IgG endpoint titer of 98% and 93% for Gn and Gc, respectively, compared with non-depleted serum (Figure 2A). The impact of this antigen-specific antibody depletion on the ability of the pooled serum to neutralize RVFV in vitro was then measured by VNT50. Anti-Gn antibody depletion resulted in a 79% reduction in nAb titer compared with the non-depleted serum (Figure 2B). In contrast, depletion of anti-Gc antibodies from sera showed a modest 29% reduction compared with the non-depleted serum (Figure 2B). Depletion of both Gn and Gc antibodies showed a 79% reduction in nAb titer, identical to the pool depleted of anti-Gn antibodies alone (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Neutralizing Antibody Titers Predominantly Target RVFV Gn over Gc

Individual sera were pooled from individuals in Tana River county (n = 7) and depleted of anti-Gn antibodies, anti-Gc antibodies, both, or neither.

(A) Confirmation of depletion by Gn ELISA (left) and Gc ELISA (right) with Gn and Gc Endpoint titers of each pool calculated in the table.

(B) Neutralization titer (VNT50) of each depleted pool as a percentage of non-depleted serum (VNT50 of Gn antibody depletion, 1,600; Gc antibody depletion, 5,344; Gn + Gc antibody depletion, 1,600; non-depleted, 7,557).

(C) Neutralization titer (FRNT50) after repeating experiment using an entirely different serum pooled from individuals from Kilifi county (n = 6) and confirming the same result.

Neutralizing Antibody Titers Predominantly Target RVFV Gn over Gc Individual sera were pooled from individuals in Tana River county (n = 7) and depleted of anti-Gn antibodies, anti-Gc antibodies, both, or neither. (A) Confirmation of depletion by Gn ELISA (left) and Gc ELISA (right) with Gn and Gc Endpoint titers of each pool calculated in the table. (B) Neutralization titer (VNT50) of each depleted pool as a percentage of non-depleted serum (VNT50 of Gn antibody depletion, 1,600; Gc antibody depletion, 5,344; Gn + Gc antibody depletion, 1,600; non-depleted, 7,557). (C) Neutralization titer (FRNT50) after repeating experiment using an entirely different serum pooled from individuals from Kilifi county (n = 6) and confirming the same result. Of 200 adults under longitudinal surveillance for malaria studies in Kilifi county, 6 (3%) in 2018 had evidence of RVFV exposure on the basis of carriage of RVFV nAbs (see Methods). To confirm the predominance of Gn as a target of the RVFV nAb response, we pooled sera from these six individuals and repeated the depletion experiment described above using a different assay to measure RVFV nAbs, focus reduction neutralization assay (FRNT50; see Methods). Results were consistent, showing a relative reduction in FRNT50 of approximately 76%, 14%, and 70% in sera depleted of antibodies to Gn, Gc, or both, respectively (Figure 2C). These data support RVFV Gn as the major target of the nAb response arising during natural RVFV infection.

IgG and RVFV nAb Titers Remain High over Many Years

To study longevity of the observed immune responses we used three of the six RVFV-exposed adults from Kilifi county who had corresponding stored serum samples spanning multiple years between 1998 and 2018 (see Methods). We also included stored sera from an additional two RVFV-exposed adults identified from the same surveillance study in previous years. Overall, the period covered by each individual's samples ranged from 3 to 11 years, but dates of RVFV exposure were unknown (Figure 3). Both IgG (anti-Gn and anti-Gc) and RVFV nAb titers were readily detected over the period of follow-up (Figure 3). In keeping with the two seminal studies on the durability of RVFV nAb titers, the individual from whom we had the highest number of samples, JA0073 (n = 8), exhibited high nAb titers over an 11-year period (Figure 3A). RVFV nAb titers were generally stable with only slight reductions from individual peak nAb titers observed. Individual JA0073 was seronegative when sampled in 2007 but was strongly seropositive in 2008 suggesting they may have been exposed during 2007, when there was a major RVF epidemic in Kenya (Munyua et al., 2010). Individuals JA0176 and JA0193 had evidence of boosting of their nAb response (Figure 3), most likely as a result of interepidemic RVFV exposure as no RVF epidemics were reported in the country during their follow-up period. Total binding IgG titers toward both glycoproteins were also long-lasting, remaining high despite a gradual decline over the years, while avidity remained stable (Figures 3B and 3C).
Figure 3

Natural Exposure to RVFV Elicits a High-Titer, Long-Lived Humoral Response

Five individuals from Kilifi county (see text) with serum samples spanning 3–11 years were assayed for (A) Neutralization titer, (B) Titer of anti-Gn IgG, (C), Titer of anti-Gc IgG , (D) Avidity of anti-Gn IgG, and (E) Avidity of anti-Gc IgG. Year 0 is their earliest available sample, not necessarily the year of exposure, with subsequent samples plotted relative to that. Individuals' serum samples were collected between the following years: NA0027 2014–2018; NA0035 2014–2018; JA0073 2007–2018; JA0176 2011–2014; JA0193 2007–2013.

Natural Exposure to RVFV Elicits a High-Titer, Long-Lived Humoral Response Five individuals from Kilifi county (see text) with serum samples spanning 3–11 years were assayed for (A) Neutralization titer, (B) Titer of anti-Gn IgG, (C), Titer of anti-Gc IgG , (D) Avidity of anti-Gn IgG, and (E) Avidity of anti-Gc IgG. Year 0 is their earliest available sample, not necessarily the year of exposure, with subsequent samples plotted relative to that. Individuals' serum samples were collected between the following years: NA0027 2014–2018; NA0035 2014–2018; JA0073 2007–2018; JA0176 2011–2014; JA0193 2007–2013.

RVFV Infection Elicits a Moderately Low but Significant Cellular Response to Gn and Gc

Cryopreserved PBMCs were also available from five of the RVFV-exposed adults sampled in 2018 from Kilifi county, allowing an assessment of RVFV-specific T cell responses. We measured Gn and Gc-specific IFNγ responses by ELISpot in five individuals and compared these with PBMCs from five randomly selected individuals from the same population who had no evidence of RVFV exposure (on the basis of lacking RVFV nAb or Gn/Gc IgG responses). Overall, the IFNγ response was moderately low in the five RVFV-exposed individuals (mean response 67.4 spot-forming cells (SFC)/106 PBMC 95% CI 6.8–128 SFC/106), but this was significantly higher than non-exposed controls (mean response 8.4 SFC/106 PBMC 95% CI 0–21.7 SFC/106) (Figure 4A). Responses among RVFV-exposed individuals were comparable across individual peptide pools (Figure 4B). Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) was used as a positive control for PBMC stimulation, and all unexposed and RVFV-exposed individuals had a response >1,900 SFC/106 PBMC as expected. Together, these data indicate that natural RVFV exposure elicits a durable T cell response.
Figure 4

A Low but Significant Ex Vivo IFNγ ELISpot Response in Naturally Exposed Individuals

PBMC from five RVFV-exposed individuals along with five case-matched non-exposed controls were stimulated with an overlapping peptide library spanning the GnGc polyprotein.

(A) Summed responses from the five peptide pools showing significantly higher response in the naturally exposed group compared with naive controls (∗p < 0.05, unpaired t test).

(B) Responses to individual peptide pools, dotted line represents the lower limit of detection of four spot-forming cells (SFC)/106 PBMC for individual pools and 20 SFC/106 PBMC for summed responses. SEB stimulated cells for each volunteer gave >1,900 SFC/106 PBMC.

(C) Schematic of the overlapping peptide library used for stimulation. Bars represent median.

A Low but Significant Ex Vivo IFNγ ELISpot Response in Naturally Exposed Individuals PBMC from five RVFV-exposed individuals along with five case-matched non-exposed controls were stimulated with an overlapping peptide library spanning the GnGc polyprotein. (A) Summed responses from the five peptide pools showing significantly higher response in the naturally exposed group compared with naive controls (∗p < 0.05, unpaired t test). (B) Responses to individual peptide pools, dotted line represents the lower limit of detection of four spot-forming cells (SFC)/106 PBMC for individual pools and 20 SFC/106 PBMC for summed responses. SEB stimulated cells for each volunteer gave >1,900 SFC/106 PBMC. (C) Schematic of the overlapping peptide library used for stimulation. Bars represent median.

Discussion

The protective role antibodies play against RVFV infection is well documented (Peters et al., 1988; LaBeaud, 2010; Niklasson et al., 1984). The structural glycoproteins displayed on the surface of RVFV, Gn and Gc, are key targets of this protective immune response, and monoclonal antibodies have been identified targeting both (Besselaar and Blackburn, 1991; Besselaar-Blackburn, 1992; Wang et al., 2019). Studies of the live-attenuated MP-12 vaccine have shown neutralizing antibodies present in a majority of individuals at least 5 years post vaccination (Pittman et al., 2016). However, relatively little is known about the nature and longevity of the immune response after natural RVFV exposure. Here, using samples from adults in coastal Kenya with evidence of previous exposure to RVFV we show that: (1) RVFV Gn and Gc glycoproteins are both targets of the long-lived T cell and IgG response to RVFV and that the antibody response is predominated by the IgG1 sub-class, (2) RVFV nAb titers strongly correlate with Gn and Gc-specific IgG responses, and (3) Gn is the main target of the RVFV nAb response. We also found that IgG avidity against Gn (but not Gc) correlated with the RVFV nAb response, further highlighting qualitative differences in the antibody response to both glycoproteins. Studies in mice and rabbits have identified monoclonal antibodies targeting either Gn or Gc that are able to neutralize virus and confer protection against RVFV challenge (Besselaar and Blackburn, 1991; Besselaar-Blackburn, 1992; Keegan and Collett, 1986; Allen et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019). Initial hints of the possible greater role that antibodies targeting Gn play in protection, with respect to the Gc, came from reports suggesting passive transfer of anti-Gn and not anti-Gc antibodies was capable of providing protection in mice (Battles and Dalrymple, 1988). Another study in mice, this time involving vaccination with Gn- or Gc-coding DNA, showed that all those vaccinated with Gn seroconverted but only half of those vaccinated with Gc (Lagerqvist et al., 2009). A more recent study isolating mAbs from a convalescent human patient returning to China found that mAbs specific to Gn exhibited much higher neutralization titers than those that bind Gc (Wang et al., 2019). This provides some evidence, perhaps, that the larger negative impact on neutralization titer seen in our study after depleting antibodies targeting Gn, compared with Gc, reflects a greater neutralizing potential of anti-Gn antibodies rather than merely increased abundance over anti-Gc antibodies. Further evidence supporting this hypothesis can be observed from our measurement of IgG avidity. Higher avidity antibodies can bind antigen more efficiently, and only the higher avidity of anti-Gn antibodies was associated with increased nAb titer. Although avidity was very stable over many years, it is typically lower in acute or recent infection. However, owing to the sparse sampling (no more than once a year), initial changes in the weeks and months post exposure are not visible. Our recombinantly derived RVFV Gn and Gc were secreted from HEK 293T cells and thus subject to the cellular folding checkpoints that exist in mammalian cells (Ellgaard and Helenius, 2003). Similar constructs and protein production methods have been used to successfully produce and crystallize phleboviral Gn (Halldorsson et al., 2018) and Gc glycoproteins (Halldorsson et al., 2016), as well as the Gn and Gc from related hantaviruses (Li et al., 2016; Rissanen et al., 2017; Rissanen et al., 2020), and their native-like fold architectures have been shown to be compatible with cryoEM-derived reconstructions of purified virions and virus-like particles (Halldorsson et al., 2018). These combined observations indicate that our recombinantly produced RVFV proteins can serve as “native-like” mimetics of RVFV Gn and Gc. However, it is also important to acknowledge that recombinant material will not completely match the native form of the virus. For example, the recombinant and putatively monomeric RVFV Gn and Gc used in these assays does not replicate their native higher-order, membrane-bound pentameric and hexameric Gn-Gc assemblies on the virion surface (Halldorsson et al., 2018). Although our data show that dual depletion of both Gn and Gc antibodies reduces nAb titers to identical levels seen in sera depleted of Gn antibodies alone, even dual-depleted sera can neutralize live virus at the highest concentration (Figure 2). Although this is likely due, at least in part, to the incomplete nature of the depletion (corresponding ELISA signal post depletion was not entirely eliminated at high serum concentrations), it is also likely that a subset of antibodies recognize epitopes constituting higher-order quaternary assemblies formed on the native virion surface. These antibodies may be capable of neutralizing whole virus but may not bind our recombinant Gn or Gc and therefore would not have been depleted. Nevertheless, we were still able to assess the relative contribution antibodies targeting each individual glycoprotein have on neutralization, demonstrating reproducibility of the effect in two different populations within Kenya, using two different measures of nAb. Although both glycoproteins are clearly immunogenic and targeted by the nAb response, our data suggest that after naturally acquired human infection antibodies targeting Gn, rather than Gc, play a larger role in RVFV neutralization. This is perhaps not surprising considering that the N-terminal component of Gn occupies the most membrane-distal region of the virus, which plays a role in shielding the cognate Gc (Halldorsson et al., 2018; Allen et al., 2018), and therefore may be more easily accessible to the host immune system (Figure S2). Although protection against RVFV infection has long been associated with the induction of nAbs targeting Gn and Gc (Dodd et al., 2013; Peters et al., 1988; LaBeaud, 2010), it can also arise from other mechanisms. Mice vaccinated with the immunodominant nucleoprotein (N), for example, show partial protection from RVFV challenge despite the absence of detectable nAbs (Lopez-Gil et al., 2013; Jansen Van Vuren et al., 2011). Another study showed the cooperative effect of a non-neutralizing antibody improving protection in a mouse model (Gutjahr et al., 2020). Perhaps more surprisingly, mice vaccinated with modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) expressing both Gn and Gc failed to elicit nAbs but were still protected from viral challenge (Lopez-Gil et al., 2020). IgG1, the predominant subclass recognizing the RVFV glycoproteins identified here, can efficiently trigger the classical route of complement (Vidarsson et al., 2014). Although the contribution that non-neutralizing antibodies and cellular immunity have on protection against RVFV is less well characterized, numerous components of the immune response may function together during acute infection (including experimental challenge in animals) to provide protection. Studies on the immune response during acute RVFV infections in humans are needed to determine the role of other immune mechanisms in disease pathogenesis and protection. Owing to its extensive anti-viral properties, we have used IFNγ as a broad measure of the cellular response to RVFV in these individuals. The ex vivo ELISpot carried out here is a measure of effector memory T cells that are able to secrete IFNγ within hours of re-exposure to antigen (Calarota and Baldanti, 2013). We have shown that these cells, circulating in the peripheral blood, are relatively low in number in humans with historical RVFV infection. However, they are still detectable in the majority of individuals many years after exposure and may potentially play an important role in protection. Recently, the T cell responses in human volunteers vaccinated with multiple doses of a formalin-inactivated RVF vaccine were characterized (Harmon et al., 2020). Despite also showing a generally low cellular response, IFNγ expression post stimulation with Gn, Gc, and N peptides were detected by ELISpot many years post vaccination. A previous study exploring the cellular response to RVFV in a non-human primate model has shown that non-lethal challenge was associated with early proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in addition to early Th1 cytokine production, including IFNγ (Wonderlich et al., 2018). Another study in humans showed higher expression of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, was associated with fatal cases (McElroy and Nichol, 2012). These findings, together with the critical role CD4+ T cells play in generating strong antibody responses (Dodd et al., 2013), indicate the importance and benefit of a robust cellular response. Owing to the presence of high-titer, long-lived nAbs, it is plausible that the naturally acquired immune response to RVFV may be sufficient for long-lasting protection, particularly as nAbs are associated with protection in animals. The observation that antibodies targeting Gn play a comparatively larger role in neutralization than those that target Gc has potential implications for vaccine design and is suggestive that the Gn may be the most critical antigen to include in RVFV candidate vaccines. We have provided data characterizing the immune response in a large number of naturally exposed Kenyan adults who are likely protected from re-exposure. These data can provide a useful benchmark for immune responses elicited in future clinical trials of candidate vaccines.

Limitations of the Study

Although our immunological assessments of individuals naturally exposed to RVFV provide useful data on immunity to infection, there is a lot that we do not know regarding their previous RVFV exposure. Precise dates on when the RVFV infections occurred were unknown, making it difficult to ascribe any acute febrile illnesses encountered by the individuals in the years preceding this study. Furthermore, given that RVFV can also cause self-limiting illness, active surveillance for the incidence of such infections would be the best approach to relate particular acute illnesses to a corresponding boost in immune responses. Additional unknowns include the route of exposure (mosquito bite versus contact with infected animal tissue), presence of co-infections, and their clinical manifestations. All of these factors will have likely influenced their subsequent response to RVFV and further work with larger sample sizes is needed to connect immunological attributes with clinical outcomes and disease severity.

Resource Availability

Lead Contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Daniel Wright (danny.wright@ndm.ox.ac.uk).

Materials Availability

Plasmids generated in this study are available from the Lead Contact with a completed Materials Transfer Agreement.

Data and Code Availability

The published article includes all datasets generated or analyzed during this study.

Methods

All methods can be found in the accompanying Transparent Methods supplemental file.
  42 in total

1.  Rift Valley fever virus inhibits a pro-inflammatory response in experimentally infected human monocyte derived macrophages and a pro-inflammatory cytokine response may be associated with patient survival during natural infection.

Authors:  Anita K McElroy; Stuart T Nichol
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 2.  Risk factors associated with human Rift Valley fever infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dennis E Nicholas; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Nigel M Waters
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Genetic variation among geographic isolates of Rift Valley fever virus.

Authors:  J K Battles; J M Dalrymple
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 4.  Rift valley fever.

Authors:  B C Easterday
Journal:  Adv Vet Sci       Date:  1965

5.  Peripheral Blood Biomarkers of Disease Outcome in a Monkey Model of Rift Valley Fever Encephalitis.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Wonderlich; Amy L Caroline; Cynthia M McMillen; Aaron W Walters; Douglas S Reed; Simon M Barratt-Boyes; Amy L Hartman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Structural Transitions of the Conserved and Metastable Hantaviral Glycoprotein Envelope.

Authors:  Ilona Rissanen; Robert Stass; Antra Zeltina; Sai Li; Jussi Hepojoki; Karl Harlos; Robert J C Gilbert; Juha T Huiskonen; Thomas A Bowden
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 7.  The WHO R&D Blueprint: 2018 review of emerging infectious diseases requiring urgent research and development efforts.

Authors:  Massinissa Si Mehand; Farah Al-Shorbaji; Piers Millett; Bernadette Murgue
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.970

8.  Two monoclonal antibodies against glycoprotein Gn protect mice from Rift Valley Fever challenge by cooperative effects.

Authors:  Benjamin Gutjahr; Markus Keller; Melanie Rissmann; Felicitas von Arnim; Susanne Jäckel; Sven Reiche; Reiner Ulrich; Martin H Groschup; Martin Eiden
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-03-11

9.  A Molecular-Level Account of the Antigenic Hantaviral Surface.

Authors:  Sai Li; Ilona Rissanen; Antra Zeltina; Jussi Hepojoki; Jayna Raghwani; Karl Harlos; Oliver G Pybus; Juha T Huiskonen; Thomas A Bowden
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Rift Valley fever virus vaccination induces long-lived, antigen-specific human T cell responses.

Authors:  Jessica R Harmon; Dominique J Barbeau; Stuart T Nichol; Christina F Spiropoulou; Anita K McElroy
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 7.344

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Bunyavirus Glycoprotein Research: Precursor Processing, Receptor Binding and Structure.

Authors:  Ruben J G Hulswit; Guido C Paesen; Thomas A Bowden; Xiaohong Shi
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 2.  Entry of Phenuiviruses into Mammalian Host Cells.

Authors:  Jana Koch; Qilin Xin; Nicole D Tischler; Pierre-Yves Lozach
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 5.048

3.  Stability of Chimpanzee Adenovirus Vectored Vaccines (ChAdOx1 and ChAdOx2) in Liquid and Lyophilised Formulations.

Authors:  Adam Berg; Daniel Wright; Pawan Dulal; Anna Stedman; Sofiya Fedosyuk; Michael J Francis; Bryan Charleston; George M Warimwe; Alexander D Douglas
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-28

4.  Isotype-Specific Fc Effector Functions Enhance Antibody-Mediated Rift Valley Fever Virus Protection In Vivo.

Authors:  Haley N Cartwright; Dominique J Barbeau; Anita K McElroy
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 5.  Adenovirus-based vaccines-a platform for pandemic preparedness against emerging viral pathogens.

Authors:  Lynda Coughlan; Eric J Kremer; Dmitry M Shayakhmetov
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 12.910

Review 6.  Glycosylation of viral proteins: Implication in virus-host interaction and virulence.

Authors:  Tingting Feng; Jinyu Zhang; Zhiqian Chen; Wen Pan; Zhengrong Chen; Yongdong Yan; Jianfeng Dai
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Recovery of Two Replication-Competent Canine Distemper Viruses That Separately Express Dabie Bandavirus Gn and Gc.

Authors:  Jiahui Lin; Yuehua Li; Liangpeng Lyu; Qianqian Wang; Hui Zhang; Bo Ni; Fuxiao Liu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.