| Literature DB >> 33134079 |
Rami Lee1, Na-Eun Lee1, Sun-Hye Choi1, Sung Min Nam1, Hyoung-Chun Kim2, Hyewhon Rhim3, Ik-Hyun Cho4, Sung-Hee Hwang5, Seung-Yeol Nah1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, gintonin and gintonin-enriched fraction (GEF) have been isolated from ginseng, a herbal medicine. Gintonin induces [Ca2+]i transition in cultured hippocampal neurons and stimulates acetylcholine release through LPA receptor activation. Oral administration of GEF is linked to hippocampus-dependent cognitive enhancement and other neuroprotective effects; however, effects of its long-term administration on hippocampal gene expression remains unknown. Here, we used next-generation sequence (NGS) analysis to examine changes in hippocampal gene expressions after long-term oral administration of GEF.Entities:
Keywords: Cognition; Ginseng; Gintonin; Hippocampus gene; NGS analysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33134079 PMCID: PMC7588706 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Med Res ISSN: 2213-4220
Sequences of the primers for real-time polymerase chain reaction.
| Gene name | Forward primer sequence | Reverse primer sequence | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | AGGGCAGCCTCTCTGTATGA | ATCCTCGTTGGACGCCATTT | 241 |
| Tdo2 | GGTGCTGCTCTGCTTGTTTG | TCGAGGCTCCTCCCTGTAAA | 124 |
| Adrb3 | ATCACTCTGTCTCCAGGCTCT | TGCCTATTGTGAGAGATGGTCC | 139 |
| Crh | CAACCTCAGCCGGTTCTGAT | GGAAAAAGTTAGCCGCAGCC | 160 |
Fig. 1Transcriptomic analysis of mouse hippocampus after oral administration of GEF. A. Visualization of gene expression through the Volcano map. These data show the gene expression distributions between the control and GEF treated groups. These figures show a broad range of expression patterns for the selection of genes with specific brain-related functions. The results were analyzed based on more than 2.0-fold change and factors with p-value <0.05. The x-axis represents the fold-change and the y-axis represents the p-value. The red dot in the right shows the distribution chart of up-regulated genes, and the green dot shows the distribution chart of down-regulated genes. It represents the overall expression of genes and identifies distribution of selected candidate genes associated with specific brain functions. The left panel represents the GEF50 group and the right panel represents the GEF100 group. B. The number of genes expressed between control and GEF treatment groups with different dosages. The results were analyzed using the criteria of more than 2.0-fold change and factors. The white bar shows the up-regulated genes and the grey bar shows the down-regulation genes. C. Venn diagram showing the comparison of genes expressed differently between the groups treated with GEF at different dosages. The results were analyzed using the criteria of more than 2.0-fold change; the left side of the Venn diagram (hatched) represents the GEF50 group and the right side represents the GEF100 group. The top of the numbers in each Venn diagram denotes the number of up-regulated genes and an underline denotes the number of down-regulated genes.
Fig. 2Hierarchical clustering heatmap analysis of mouse hippocampus after oral administration of GEF. Log2 fold-change vs. p-value plot of next- generation sequencing (NGS) data analysis of gene expression in isolated mouse hippocampus after oral administration of GEF over saline-treated mice (n = 6), highlighting down-regulated genes (green <4-fold) and up-regulated genes (red >4-fold). Hierarchical clustering heatmap shows the result of hierarchical clustering (HCL) through MeV programs. Top 11 upregulated genes and the top 20 downregulated genes are shown in GEF vs Saline-treated mice. Black color represents the baseline, up-regulated genes are denoted by red color, and down-regulated genes by green color.
List of expressed genes by GEF: Aging group.
| Gene symbol | GEF50/Control | GEF100 /Control | transcript_id | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plxnd1 | 3.396 | 2.421 | NM_026376 | plexin D1 |
| Itgb3 | 2.932 | 2.219 | NM_016780 | integrin beta 3 |
| Kdr | 0.347 | 0.482 | NM_010612 | kinase insert domain protein receptor |
| Nrp1 | 0.335 | 0.458 | NM_008737 | neuropilin 1 |
| Sema5a | 0.417 | 0.453 | NM_009154 | sema domain, seven thrombospondin repeats (type 1 and type 1-like), transmembrane domain (TM) and short cytoplasmic domain, (semaphorin) 5A |
| E2f7 | 0.384 | 0.443 | NM_178609 | E2F transcription factor 7 |
| Jun | 0.474 | 0.396 | NM_010591 | jun proto-oncogene |
| Ccbe1 | 0.239 | 0.222 | NM_178793 | collagen and calcium binding EGF domains 1 |
Fig. 3Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis of gene expression change. 50 mg/kg (GEF50) and 100 mg/kg (GEF100) were orally administered to mice and the total RNA from the hippocampus was extracted. A. ChAT expression mRNA changes. ChAT expression is overexpressed in both GEF50 and GEF100 compared to controls. B. Tdo2 expression shows gradual down-regulation in GEF treated groups compared to control as GEF dose increases. C. Adrb3 expression significantly increases in GEF50 group compared to controls. D. In both GEF50 and GEF100 groups, Crh expression is significantly increased. β-actin was used as a comparative quantitation control. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM of the independent experiment (n = 4) in triplicate. *p < 0.05.
Fig. 4Expression of ChAT and Tdo2 proteins detected by western blot analysis. A. A significant increase in ChAT expression was observed in both groups with GEF administration. Either saline, GEF 50 mg/kg or GEF 100 mg/kg was orally administered to mice and the protein from the hippocampus was extracted. β-actin was used as a control. B. Tdo2 expression change was observed using an anti-Tdo2 antibody showing a significant increase in either GEF50 or GEF100 vs control group. All values are represented as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments in triplicate (n = 3). *p < 0.05.