| Literature DB >> 33133675 |
Tian-Yi Shen1,2, Wei-Nan Hu3, Wen-Ting Cai1, Hui-Zi Jin1, Dong-Hui Yu1, Jing-Hui Sun2, Jing Yu1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of trabeculectomy along with amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) for glaucoma.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33133675 PMCID: PMC7568795 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3949735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Figure 1Flowchart of search strategy in this systematic review. RCT, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Patient characteristics in the included trials.
| Reference | Year | Location | Inclusion criteria | Intervention | Eyes | Age, year (mean ± SD) | Sex (M/F) | Follow-up time (mos) | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheha et al. [ | 2008 | Germany | Refractory glaucoma | Trabeculectomy | 19 | 56.6 ± 6 | 11/7 | 12 | Mean IOPs; success rate; mean number of antiglaucoma medications; complications |
| Trabeculectomy with AMT | 19 | 57.6 ± 6.3 | 13/6 | ||||||
| Mahdy et al. [ | 2010 | Egypt | Primary pediatric glaucoma | Trabeculectomy | 15 | 6 ± 2.1 | 7/6 | 18 | Mean IOPs; success rate; complications |
| Trabeculectomy with AMT | 15 | 6 ± 1.8 | 5/7 | ||||||
| Yadava et al. [ | 2017 | India | POAG; PACG | Trabeculectomy | 20 | 54.65 ± 11.05 | 11/9 | 12 | Mean IOPs; success rate; complications |
| Trabeculectomy with AMT | 20 | 50.95 ± 9.54 | 9/11 | ||||||
| Eliezer et al. [ | 2006 | Brazil | POAG | Trabeculectomy | 16 | 67.6 ± 8.0 | 11/5 | 12 | Mean IOPs; BCVA; mean number of antiglaucoma medications; complications |
| Trabeculectomy with AMT | 16 | 68.3 ± 13.6 | 8/8 | ||||||
| Ji et al. [ | 2013 | China | Chronic angle-closure glaucoma; POAG | Trabeculectomy | 17 | 61.6 ± 13.4 | 10/7 | 24 | Mean IOPs; success rate; complications |
| Trabeculectomy with AMT | 17 |
POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; PAGC: primary angle-closure glaucoma; AMT: amniotic membrane transplantation
Figure 2Methodological quality summary: authors' judgments about each methodological quality item for each included study. Note: + represents yes; ? represents unclear.
Figure 3Forest plot comparison of IOP after treatment in the AMT and control group (a) preoperatively, (b) three months postoperatively, (c) six months postoperatively, and (d) one year postoperatively.
Figure 4Forest plot comparison of the number of eyes with complete success after treatment in AMT and control group. (a) Six months postoperatively; (b) One year postoperatively.
Figure 5Forest plot comparison of the number of antiglaucoma medications after treatment in the AMT and control group (a) preoperatively and (b) one year postoperatively.
Figure 6Forest plot comparison of complications after treatment in the AMT and control group. (a) Hypotony. (b) Flat anterior chamber. (c) Hyphema. (d) Encapsulated bleb. (e) Choroidal detachment.