Literature DB >> 33132623

Orthostatic retractor placement reduces operating time and post-operative inflammatory response during the learning curve of anterior approach THA.

Gert-Jan Opsomer1, Frans-Jozef Vandeputte1, Cigdem Sarac1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Handheld retractor placement (HHRP) is prone to repetitive repositioning. This could lead to muscle damage especially during a procedure with a steep learning curve. In an attempt to minimize retractor repositioning during the learning curve of direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA), we used a table mounted orthostatic retractor placement (ORP) device.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether ORP would reduce the extent of muscle damage, OR-time and post-operative inflammatory response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 29 Patients were operated by 2 surgeons who randomly used HHRP or ORP during their learning curve of DAA THA. There were 14 patients in a control group who were operated by an experienced surgeon. Blood levels of Creatine Kinase (CK), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Hemoglobin (Hb), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) were measured at 1 h pre- and 24 and 48 h post-operatively.
RESULTS: The mean OR-time was 67 and 50 min in the HHRP and ORP cohort, respectively (p < 0,001). Post-operative CRP levels were significantly higher in the HHRP cohort at 24 h (HHRP 60.64 mg/L (25.20-143.20); ORP 34.67 mg/L (9.30-71.20)) (p = 0.003) and 48 h post-operatively (HHRP 154.54 mg/L (65.90-369.00); ORP 81.60 mg/L (21.30-219.40) (p = 0.004). The post-operative Hb-levels were significantly lower in the HHRP cohort at 24 h (HHRP 11.11 g/dL (9.10-12.30); ORP 11.37 g/dL (8.80-14.00)) (p = 0.0008) and 48 h (HHRP 10.86 g/dL (9.50-12.00); ORP 11.25 g/dL (8.60-14.10)) (p = 0.03). Post-operative ESR levels were significantly higher in the HHRP cohort 48 h post-op (HHRP 45.21 mm/h (14.00-83.00); ORP 23.73 mm/h (2.00-73.00)) (p = 0.004). No significant differences were found for the CK and LDH levels at any time postoperatively. There were no complications in any group.
CONCLUSION: The use of an orthostatic retractor placement device allows for reducing the OR-time, post-operative blood loss and post-operative inflammatory response during the learning curve of DAA THA.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct anterior approach; Efficiency; Learning curve; Orthostatic retractor positioning reduces operating time and post-operative inflammatory response during the learning curve of anterior approach THA; Outcomes; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 33132623      PMCID: PMC7586062          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  21 in total

1.  What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Richard Noel de Steiger; Michelle Lorimer; Michael Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of markers for muscle damage, inflammation, and pain using minimally invasive direct anterior versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Knut Erik Mjaaland; Kjetil Kivle; Svein Svenningsen; Are Hugo Pripp; Lars Nordsletten
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Analysis of learning curve of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: A single surgeon's experience with 4017 cases over a 9-year period.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Cheng; Po-Kuei Wu; Cheng-Fong Chen; Chao-Ming Chen; Shang-Wen Tsai; Ming-Chau Chang; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.743

4.  Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers.

Authors:  Patrick F Bergin; Jason D Doppelt; Curtis J Kephart; Michael T Benke; James H Graeter; Andrew S Holmes; Hana Haleem-Smith; Rocky S Tuan; Anthony S Unger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Impact of Operative Time on Adverse Events Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel D Bohl; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Brian Darrith; Charles P Hannon; Yale A Fillingham; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States.

Authors:  Hilal Maradit Kremers; Dirk R Larson; Cynthia S Crowson; Walter K Kremers; Raynard E Washington; Claudia A Steiner; William A Jiranek; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire.

Authors:  Anna Nilsdotter; Ann Bremander
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  A meta-analysis comparing the direct anterior with other approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fatih Kucukdurmaz; Mohamed Sukeik; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.392

Review 9.  In-hospital outcomes with anterior versus posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Larry E Miller; Atul F Kamath; Friedrich Boettner; Samir K Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Posterior versus direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: difference in patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12.

Authors:  Yu Ozaki; Tomonori Baba; Yasuhiro Homma; Hironori Ochi; Taiji Watari; Sammy Banno; Mikio Matsumoto; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.