| Literature DB >> 33132388 |
Hatice Buyukozer Ozkan1, Funda Kont Cobankara2, Zafer Sayin3, Fusun Ozer4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the antibacterial activity of both separate and combined uses of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), MTAD, SmearClear (SC) and 13.8% chlorine dioxide (ClO2) irrigation solutions against Enterococcus faecalis.Entities:
Keywords: E. faecalis; Local Anti-Infective Agents; Root Canal Irrigants
Year: 2020 PMID: 33132388 PMCID: PMC7586900 DOI: 10.15644/asc54/3/3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Stomatol Croat ISSN: 0001-7019
Figure 1Flow Chart of the Study Design
Basic irrigation Solutions and Manufacturers
| 5.25% Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) | Caglayan Kimya San., Konya/Turkey |
| 2% Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) | Klorhex, Drogsan ilaç san., Ankara/Turkey |
| 13.8% Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) | Bioclenz, Frontier Pharmaceutical, Melville, NY, USA |
| BioPure MTAD (MTAD) | Dentsply, Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA |
| SmearClear (SC) | Sybron Endo, Orange, CA, USA |
| 3% Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) | Kimpa ilaç lab. Ve tic. Ltd. sti.; Istanbul, Turkey |
| 17% Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid (EDTA) | Prepared in the laboratory |
Figure 2Bacterial growth curves resulting from time-dependent OD values
Figure 4CHX and Combinations
Figure 5NaOCl and Combinations
Figure 6ClO2 and Combinations
Figure 7MTAD and Combinations
Figure 8SC and Combinations
Figure 9H2O2 and Combinations
Figure 10EDTA and Combinations
Figure 3Mean OD values of irrigation regimens used in the experiment