Literature DB >> 33132194

Combining wearable sensor signals, machine learning and biomechanics to estimate tibial bone force and damage during running.

Emily S Matijevich1, Leon R Scott2, Peter Volgyesi3, Kendall H Derry4, Karl E Zelik5.   

Abstract

There are tremendous opportunities to advance science, clinical care, sports performance, and societal health if we are able to develop tools for monitoring musculoskeletal loading (e.g., forces on bones or muscles) outside the lab. While wearable sensors enable non-invasive monitoring of human movement in applied situations, current commercial wearables do not estimate tissue-level loading on structures inside the body. Here we explore the feasibility of using wearable sensors to estimate tibial bone force during running. First, we used lab-based data and musculoskeletal modeling to estimate tibial force for ten participants running across a range of speeds and slopes. Next, we converted lab-based data to signals feasibly measured with wearables (inertial measurement units on the foot and shank, and pressure-sensing insoles) and used these data to develop two multi-sensor algorithms for estimating peak tibial force: one physics-based and one machine learning. Additionally, to reflect current running wearables that utilize running impact metrics to infer musculoskeletal loading or injury risk, we estimated tibial force using a commonly measured impact metric, the ground reaction force vertical average loading rate (VALR). Using VALR to estimate peak tibial force resulted in a mean absolute percent error of 9.9%, which was no more accurate than a theoretical step counter that assumed the same peak force for every running stride. Our physics-based algorithm reduced error to 5.2%, and our machine learning algorithm reduced error to 2.6%. Further, to gain insights into how force estimation accuracy relates to overuse injury risk, we computed bone damage expected due to a given loading cycle. We found that modest errors in tibial force translated into large errors in bone damage estimates. For example, a 9.9% error in tibial force using VALR translated into 104% error in estimated bone damage. Encouragingly, the physics-based and machine learning algorithms reduced damage errors to 41% and 18%, respectively. This study highlights the exciting potential to combine wearables, musculoskeletal biomechanics and machine learning to develop more accurate tools for monitoring musculoskeletal loading in applied situations.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone stress injury; Injury risk assessment; Overuse injuries; Running biomechanics; Wearables

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33132194     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  11 in total

Review 1.  Bone stress injuries.

Authors:  Tim Hoenig; Kathryn E Ackerman; Belinda R Beck; Mary L Bouxsein; David B Burr; Karsten Hollander; Kristin L Popp; Tim Rolvien; Adam S Tenforde; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 52.329

2.  Experimental recommendations for estimating lower extremity loading based on joint and activity.

Authors:  Todd J Hullfish; John F Drazan; Josh R Baxter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

4.  Recent Machine Learning Progress in Lower Limb Running Biomechanics With Wearable Technology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liangliang Xiang; Alan Wang; Yaodong Gu; Liang Zhao; Vickie Shim; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.493

Review 5.  Preventing Bone Stress Injuries in Runners with Optimal Workload.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; W Brent Edwards; Richard W Willy
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.163

6.  A Promising Wearable Solution for the Practical and Accurate Monitoring of Low Back Loading in Manual Material Handling.

Authors:  Emily S Matijevich; Peter Volgyesi; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Inertial Motion Capture-Based Wearable Systems for Estimation of Joint Kinetics: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chang June Lee; Jung Keun Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Electronic textiles for energy, sensing, and communication.

Authors:  Kang Du; Rongzhou Lin; Lu Yin; John S Ho; Joseph Wang; Chwee Teck Lim
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-29

9.  Ankle Angle Prediction Using a Footwear Pressure Sensor and a Machine Learning Technique.

Authors:  Zachary Choffin; Nathan Jeong; Michael Callihan; Savannah Olmstead; Edward Sazonov; Sarah Thakral; Camilee Getchell; Vito Lombardi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 10.  Wearables for Biomechanical Performance Optimization and Risk Assessment in Industrial and Sports Applications.

Authors:  Sam McDevitt; Haley Hernandez; Jamison Hicks; Russell Lowell; Hamza Bentahaikt; Reuben Burch; John Ball; Harish Chander; Charles Freeman; Courtney Taylor; Brock Anderson
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.