Jin Woo Choi1, Du Hyun Ro2, Hee Dong Chae3, Dong Hyun Kim4, Myungsu Lee3, Saebeom Hur3, Hyo-Cheol Kim3, Hwan Jun Jae3, Jin Wook Chung3. 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea. Electronic address: jwchoi@snuh.org. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea. 4. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the value of preprocedural MR imaging in genicular artery embolization (GAE) for patients with osteoarthritic knee pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively analyzed 28 knees in 18 patients who underwent GAE for intractable knee pain < 1 month after MR imaging. The pain experienced in each knee was evaluated on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and 1- and 3-month after GAE. "GAE responders" were defined as knees that exhibited greater than 30% reduction of VAS pain scores from baseline at both follow-up visits. Musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated MR images of the affected knee compartment regarding cartilage defects, osteophytes, subchondral cysts, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), meniscal injury, and joint effusion. The performances of Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading and MR findings in predicting GAE responders was estimated based on receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The mean VAS pain score was 84.3 mm. BML (area under the curve [AUC], 0.860; P < .001), meniscal injury (AUC, 0.811; P = .003), and KL grading (AUC, 0.898; P < .001) were significantly associated with GAE outcome. To predict GAE responders, KL grade ≤ 2 yielded a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 60.9%, BML grade ≤ 1 yielded a sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 69.6%, and meniscal injury grade ≤ 2 yielded a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 72.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Large BMLs and severe meniscal injuries on MR imaging, as well as high KL grades, indicated poor responses to GAE.
PURPOSE: To determine the value of preprocedural MR imaging in genicular artery embolization (GAE) for patients with osteoarthritic knee pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively analyzed 28 knees in 18 patients who underwent GAE for intractable knee pain < 1 month after MR imaging. The pain experienced in each knee was evaluated on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and 1- and 3-month after GAE. "GAE responders" were defined as knees that exhibited greater than 30% reduction of VAS pain scores from baseline at both follow-up visits. Musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated MR images of the affected knee compartment regarding cartilage defects, osteophytes, subchondral cysts, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), meniscal injury, and joint effusion. The performances of Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading and MR findings in predicting GAE responders was estimated based on receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The mean VAS pain score was 84.3 mm. BML (area under the curve [AUC], 0.860; P < .001), meniscal injury (AUC, 0.811; P = .003), and KL grading (AUC, 0.898; P < .001) were significantly associated with GAE outcome. To predict GAE responders, KL grade ≤ 2 yielded a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 60.9%, BML grade ≤ 1 yielded a sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 69.6%, and meniscal injury grade ≤ 2 yielded a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 72.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Large BMLs and severe meniscal injuries on MR imaging, as well as high KL grades, indicated poor responses to GAE.