Literature DB >> 33131860

Effects of protection and restoration on reducing ecological vulnerability.

Qiang Li1, Xueyi Shi2, Qingqing Wu3.   

Abstract

Quantitative assessment and long-term analysis of ecological vulnerability can effectively grasp the driving factors of environmental change, which is of great significance for ecological protection and restoration. This study took 381 villages in Jingle County, a typical ecological vulnerable area on the Loess Plateau, as basic evaluation unit, and an ecological vulnerability evaluation index system with 12 evaluation indexes was constructed based on "sensitivity-resilience-pressure" (SRP) conceptual model. Combined with spatial principal component analysis, spatial autocorrelation, cross-sectional and panel regression, the spatio-temporal variation characteristics and driving factors of ecological vulnerability in 2005, 2010 and 2015 were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that areas classified as not and somewhat vulnerable were expanding, while areas classified as highly and extremely vulnerable were shrinking from 2005 to 2015. The variations of ecological vulnerability were the result of interaction of natural environment and human activities, among which Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), distance from main road and distance from river system were conducive to reducing ecological vulnerability, moreover, NDVI has the greatest impact on the probability of ecological vulnerability transition from high to low, with a regression coefficient of 46.66. The impact of social factors decreased relatively, while the role of natural factors increased, and increasing vegetation coverage and economic development helped reduce ecological vulnerability.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological restoration; Logistic regression; NDVI; Policy advices

Year:  2020        PMID: 33131860     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

Review 1.  Research Advancement in Grassland Ecosystem Vulnerability and Ecological Resilience and Its Inspiration for Improving Grassland Ecosystem Services in the Karst Desertification Control.

Authors:  Jinzhong Fang; Kangning Xiong; Yongkuan Chi; Shuzhen Song; Cheng He; Shuyu He
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 2.  A Review of Village Ecosystem Vulnerability and Resilience: Implications for the Rocky Desertification Control.

Authors:  Jiuhan Tang; Kangning Xiong; Yue Chen; Qi Wang; Bin Ying; Jiayi Zhou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Will the economic growth benefit public health? Health vulnerability, urbanization and COVID-19 in the USA.

Authors:  Ye Fan; Ming Fang; Xin Zhang; Yongda Yu
Journal:  Ann Reg Sci       Date:  2022-01-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.