Literature DB >> 33131460

Influence of countermovement depth on the countermovement jump-derived reactive strength index modified.

Alejandro Pérez-Castilla1, Jonathon Weakley2,3, Felipe García-Pinillos1,4, F Javier Rojas1, Amador García-Ramos1,5.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of countermovement depth on the magnitude of the countermovement jump (CMJ) derived reactive strength index modified (RSImod), and to compare the RSImod between the CMJ performed with a self-preferred knee flexion angle (CMJpref) and the CMJ performed from a pre-determined knee flexion angle (CMJrefer) with the countermovement depth more similar to the CMJpref. Sixteen subjects (11 males and 5 females; age 25.1 ± 6.3 years, body mass 69.7 ± 10.2 kg, body height 172.9 ± 8.1 m) randomly performed in a single session the CMJpref and CMJs from five pre-determined knee flexion angles (60°, 75°, 90°, 105°, and 120°). Our results showed that lower knee flexion angles were generally associated with greater RSImod values with the CMJ performed at 60° showing the greatest RSImod (P ≤ 0.049; effect size [ES] range = 0.19-0.63). The greatest RSImod for the CMJ performed at 60° was caused by the proportionally lower values of the time to take-off (ES range = 0.65-1.91) compared to the decrease observed in jump height (ES range = 0.11-0.25). The RSImod was higher for the CMJpref compared to the CMJrefer (P < 0.001; ES = 0.34) due to a higher jump height (P = 0.021; ES = 0.14) and reduced time to take-off (P < 0.001; ES = 0.85). These results indicate that practitioners should be careful when interpreting an individual's changes in RSImod when the countermovement depth is not similar across the testing sessions. However, since the use of pre-determined knee flexion angles negatively impacts the RSImod, we encourage practitioners to use the CMJpref but only compare the RSImod when CMJs are performed using consistent countermovement depths.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Force platform; jump height; jumping ability; knee flexion angle; vertical jump

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33131460     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1845815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  3 in total

1.  The association between reactive strength index and reactive strength index modified with approach jump performance.

Authors:  Jernej Pleša; Žiga Kozinc; Darjan Smajla; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Attenuated Lower Limb Stretch-Shorten-Cycle Capacity in ACL Injured vs. Non-Injured Female Alpine Ski Racers: Not Just a Matter of Between-Limb Asymmetry.

Authors:  Matthew J Jordan; Nathaniel Morris; Sophia Nimphius; Per Aagaard; Walter Herzog
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-31

3.  Validity and Reliability of Strategy Metrics to Assess Countermovement Jump Performance using the Newly Developed My Jump Lab Smartphone Application.

Authors:  Chris Bishop; Paul Jarvis; Anthony Turner; Carlos Balsalobre-Fernandez
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.