Literature DB >> 33130932

Non-medical patient-related factor influence in proximal humeral fracture outcomes: a multicentric study.

Joan Miquel1,2, Cassart Elisa3, Santana Fernando4, Romero Alba5, Carlos Torrens4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Age, sex, and type of fracture have traditionally been described as prognostic factors for proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). Some non-medical patient-related factors may play a role in the outcome. This paper evaluates the association of comorbidities and socioeconomic factors with clinical outcomes for PHF.
METHODS: A total of 217 patients with PHF were evaluated according to Neer's classification with X-ray. Comorbidities were assessed through the Charlson comorbidity index and, non-medical patient-related factors were determined with a 52-item questionnaire concerning personal behaviors such as social activities, family support, economic solvency, and leisure-time activities. The clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), with a minimum 1-year follow-up. The minimal clinically relevant difference for the CMS was set at 10 points. A multivariable analysis was performed to adjust for comorbidities and non-medical patient-related factors, such as age, sex, fracture classification, and treatment.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-three patients completed the initial research protocol, while 126 of them completed the 1-year follow-up. The mean age was 71.6 years (SD ± 13.3), and 79.3% of the patients were women. In the bivariable analysis, age and comorbidities were correlated with the CMS (correlation coefficient: - 0.34 [- 0.49, 0.17] and 0.35 [0.18, 0.50], respectively), as well as non-medical patient-related factors and the fracture pattern (p value ANOVA < 0.001). In the multivariable regression model, the effects of considering oneself socially active, without economic problems, and self-sufficient were associated with a higher CMS than the effect of the fracture pattern (beta coefficient: 11.69 [6.09-17.30], 15.54 [8.32-22.75], and 10.61 [3.34-17.88], respectively).
CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic status had a higher impact on functional outcomes than fracture pattern in patients with PHF.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prognosis; Proximal humeral fractures; Social determinants of health; Socioeconomic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33130932     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03643-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  11 in total

1.  Functional and quality-of-life results of displaced and nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures treated conservatively.

Authors:  Carlos Torrens; Monica Corrales; Gemma Vilà; Fernando Santana; Enrique Cáceres
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Path analysis of factors for functional outcome at one year in 463 proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Norbert P Südkamp; Laurent Audigé; Simon Lambert; Ralph Hertel; Gerhard Konrad
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Investigating minimal clinically important difference for Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery.

Authors:  Juha Kukkonen; Tommi Kauko; Tero Vahlberg; Antti Joukainen; Ville Aärimaa
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  What are the factors influencing outcome among patients admitted to a hospital with a proximal humeral fracture?

Authors:  Valentin Neuhaus; Christiaan H J Swellengrebel; Jeroen K J Bossen; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The complexity of proximal humeral fractures is age and gender specific.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Michael Bauer; Gunnar Blumenstock; Christoph Eingartner; Sonja D Bahrs; Alexander Tepass; Kuno Weise; Bernd Rolauffs
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Natural history of complex fractures of the proximal humerus using a three-dimensional classification system.

Authors:  Gordon Edelson; Husam Safuri; Joseph Salami; Fina Vigder; Daniela Militianu
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated by PHILOS plate internal fixation. Experience of a district general hospital.

Authors:  Rizwan Shahid; Abid Mushtaq; Julian Northover; Mohammad Maqsood
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.500

8.  Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities.

Authors:  Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Jo C Phelan; Bruce G Link
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Social deprivation influences the epidemiology and outcome of proximal humeral fractures in adults for a defined urban population of Scotland.

Authors:  N D Clement; M M McQueen; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-06

10.  Adding socioeconomic status to Framingham scoring to reduce disparities in coronary risk assessment.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Daniel Tancredi; Peter Franks
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  1 in total

1.  Therapeutic and prognostic predictive value of the Control Volume severity grade on proximal humerus fractures due to bone fragility.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Andrea Cozzolino; Giuseppe Della Rotonda; Antonio Guastafierro; Stefano Viglione; Paolo Francesco Malfi; Paolo Minopoli; Luciano Mottola; Marco Mortellaro; Livia Renata Pietroluongo
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.