| Literature DB >> 33130217 |
M Shi1, A Gu2, H Tu3, C Huang4, H Wang10, Z Yu6, X Wang7, L Cao8, Y Shu9, H Wang10, R Yang11, X Li12, J Chang13, Y Hu16, P Shen15, Y Hu16, Z Guo17, M Tao18, Y Zhang19, X Liu20, Q Sun21, X Zhang22, Z Jiang23, J Zhao24, F Chen25, H Yu25, W Zhang26, J Sun26, D Li26, J Zhou26, B Han27, Y L Wu28.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polymeric micellar paclitaxel (pm-Pac) is a novel Cremophor EL-free, nanoparticle micellar formulation of paclitaxel. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between pm-Pac plus cisplatin and solvent-based paclitaxel (sb-Pac) plus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 448 stage IIIB to IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive six 3-week cycles of either pm-Pac (230 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (70 mg/m2; n = 300), followed by dose escalation of pm-Pac to 300 mg/m2 from the second 3-week cycle if prespecified toxic effects were not observed after the first cycle, or sb-Pac (175 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (70 mg/m2; n = 148). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent review committees (IRCs). The secondary end points included IRC-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.Entities:
Keywords: chemotherapy; non-small-cell lung cancer; pm-paclitaxel
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33130217 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Oncol ISSN: 0923-7534 Impact factor: 32.976