Brook A L Perry1, Stuart Mason1, Jennifer Nacef2, Ashley Waddle2, Brian Hynes3, Caroline Bergmann4, Michael C Schmid5, Christopher I Petkov2, Alexander Thiele2, Anna S Mitchell6. 1. Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Tinsley Building, Oxford, OX1 3SR, UK. 2. Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. 3. Hybex Innovations Inc., 9851 Boulevard Parkway, Anjou, Quebec, H1J 1P3, Canada. 4. Biomedical Services Department, Oxford University, Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3TA, UK. 5. Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK; University of Fribourg, Faculty of Science and Medicine, Chemin du Musée 5, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland. 6. Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Tinsley Building, Oxford, OX1 3SR, UK. Electronic address: anna.mitchell@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuroscience studies with macaque monkeys may require cranial implants to stabilize the head or gain access to the brain for scientific purposes. Wound management that promotes healing after the cranial implant surgery in non-human primates can be difficult as it is not necessarily possible to cover the wound margins. NEW METHOD: Here, we developed an easily modifiable head cap that protects the sutured skin margins after cranial implant surgery and contributes to wound healing. The protective head cap was developed in response to monkeys picking at sutured skin margins around an implant, complicating healing. The user-friendly protective cap, made from Klarity- R™ Sheet (3.2 mm thick with 36 % or 42 % perforation) is affixed to the implant post-surgically. Once secured and while the monkey is still anesthetized, the plastic sheeting is molded around the implant. The protective head cap restricts the monkey's finger access to its' wound margins while allowing air to circulate to promote wound healing. RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Across two UK primate facilities, the protective head cap promoted wound healing. In monkeys that did not wear the head cap, re-suturing was necessary in ∼30 % of cases. In contrast, none of the monkeys that wore the head cap required re-suturing. The monkeys wearing the head cap also had reduced numbers of days of prescribed antibiotics and analgesia. CONCLUSION: This bespoken, easily adaptable, protective head cap supports postoperative wound healing, and enhances the welfare of monkeys involved in neuroscience research.
BACKGROUND: Neuroscience studies with macaque monkeys may require cranial implants to stabilize the head or gain access to the brain for scientific purposes. Wound management that promotes healing after the cranial implant surgery in non-human primates can be difficult as it is not necessarily possible to cover the wound margins. NEW METHOD: Here, we developed an easily modifiable head cap that protects the sutured skin margins after cranial implant surgery and contributes to wound healing. The protective head cap was developed in response to monkeys picking at sutured skin margins around an implant, complicating healing. The user-friendly protective cap, made from Klarity- R™ Sheet (3.2 mm thick with 36 % or 42 % perforation) is affixed to the implant post-surgically. Once secured and while the monkey is still anesthetized, the plastic sheeting is molded around the implant. The protective head cap restricts the monkey's finger access to its' wound margins while allowing air to circulate to promote wound healing. RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Across two UK primate facilities, the protective head cap promoted wound healing. In monkeys that did not wear the head cap, re-suturing was necessary in ∼30 % of cases. In contrast, none of the monkeys that wore the head cap required re-suturing. The monkeys wearing the head cap also had reduced numbers of days of prescribed antibiotics and analgesia. CONCLUSION: This bespoken, easily adaptable, protective head cap supports postoperative wound healing, and enhances the welfare of monkeys involved in neuroscience research.
Authors: Kimberley A Phillips; Karen L Bales; John P Capitanio; Alan Conley; Paul W Czoty; Bert A 't Hart; William D Hopkins; Shiu-Lok Hu; Lisa A Miller; Michael A Nader; Peter W Nathanielsz; Jeffrey Rogers; Carol A Shively; Mary Lou Voytko Journal: Am J Primatol Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 2.371
Authors: Henry Friedman; Nancy Ator; Nancy Haigwood; William Newsome; James S Allan; Thaddeus G Golos; Jeff H Kordower; Robert E Shade; Michael E Goldberg; Matthew R Bailey; Paul Bianchi Journal: Pathog Immun Date: 2017-08-23
Authors: Michael Ortiz-Rios; Marcus Haag; Fabien Balezeau; Stephen Frey; Alex Thiele; Kathy Murphy; Michael Christoph Schmid Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2018-09-16 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Anna S Mitchell; Alexander Thiele; Christopher I Petkov; Angela Roberts; Trevor W Robbins; Wolfram Schultz; Roger Lemon Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 10.834