Literature DB >> 33129729

Feasibility and Prognostic Value of Vasodilator Stress Perfusion CMR in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Théo Pezel1, Francesca Sanguineti2, Marine Kinnel2, Valentin Landon2, Solenn Toupin3, Thierry Unterseeh2, Yves Louvard2, Stéphane Champagne2, Marie Claude Morice2, Thomas Hovasse2, Philippe Garot2, Jérôme Garot4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
BACKGROUND: Because most studies have excluded arrhythmic patients, the prognostic value of stress perfusion CMR in patients with AF is unknown.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, consecutive patients with suspected or stable chronic coronary artery disease and AF referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR were included and followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular event(s) (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. The diagnosis of AF was defined by 12-lead electrocardiography before and after CMR. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR.
RESULTS: Of 639 patients (mean age 72 ± 9 years, 77% men), 602 (94%) completed the CMR protocol, and 538 (89%) completed follow-up (median 5.1 years); 80 had MACE. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of ischemia (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.86 to 11.80) or LGE (HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.55 to 3.74) was associated with the occurrence of MACE (p < 0.001 for both). In a multivariate Cox regression including clinical and CMR indexes, the presence of ischemia (HR: 5.98; 95% CI: 3.68 to 9.73) or LGE (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.89 to 3.60) was an independent predictor of MACE (p < 0.001 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, stress perfusion CMR is feasible and has good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE.
Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; cardiovascular events; cardiovascular magnetic resonance; dipyridamole; perfusion imaging; stress testing

Year:  2020        PMID: 33129729     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.07.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  3 in total

1.  Long-term prognostic value of vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Karl J Weiss; Sarah B Nasser; Tamar Bigvava; Adelina Doltra; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Alexander Berger; Markus S Anker; Christian Stehning; Patrick Doeblin; Mohamed Abdelmeguid; Mohamed Talat; Rolf Gebker; Wael E-Naggar; Burkert Pieske; Sebastian Kelle
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-12-06

2.  Diagnostic value of myocardial stress detection based on feature tracking MRI in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Li Feng; Zhao Yang; Shiyue Chen; Jianghua Wan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance after inconclusive stress testing.

Authors:  Théo Pezel; Thierry Unterseeh; Philippe Garot; Thomas Hovasse; Marine Kinnel; Stéphane Champagne; Solenn Toupin; Francesca Sanguineti; Jérôme Garot
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.364

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.