Literature DB >> 33129376

Venetoclax or placebo in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (BELLINI): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

Shaji K Kumar1, Simon J Harrison2, Michele Cavo3, Javier de la Rubia4, Rakesh Popat5, Cristina Gasparetto6, Vania Hungria7, Hans Salwender8, Kenshi Suzuki9, Inho Kim10, Elizabeth A Punnoose11, Wan-Jen Hong11, Kevin J Freise12, Xiaoqing Yang12, Anjla Sood12, Muhammad Jalaluddin12, Jeremy A Ross12, James E Ward12, Paulo C Maciag12, Philippe Moreau13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venetoclax is a highly selective, potent, oral BCL-2 inhibitor, which induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells. Venetoclax plus bortezomib and dexamethasone has shown encouraging clinical efficacy with acceptable safety and tolerability in a phase 1 trial. The aim of this study was to evaluate venetoclax plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial, patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, who had received one to three previous therapies were enrolled from 90 hospitals in 16 countries. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) centrally using an interactive response technology system and a block size of three to receive venetoclax (800 mg per day orally) or placebo with bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 subcutaneously or intravenously and dexamethasone (20 mg orally). Treatment was given in 21-day cycles for the first eight cycles and 35-day cycles from the ninth cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Randomisation was stratified by previous exposure to a proteasome inhibitor and the number of previous therapies. Sponsors, investigators, study site personnel, and patients were masked to the treatment allocation throughout the study. The primary endpoint was independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02755597.
FINDINGS: Between July 19, 2016, and Oct 31, 2017, 291 patients were randomly assigned to receive venetoclax (n=194) or placebo (n=97). With a median follow-up of 18·7 months (IQR 16·6-21·0), median progression-free survival according to independent review committee was 22·4 months (95% CI 15·3-not estimable) with venetoclax versus 11·5 months (9·6-15·0) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·63 [95% CI 0·44-0·90]; p=0·010). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (35 [18%] of 193 patients in the venetoclax group vs seven [7%] of 96 patients in the placebo group), pneumonia (30 [16%] vs nine [9%]), thrombocytopenia (28 [15%] vs 29 [30%]), anaemia (28 [15%] vs 14 [15%]), and diarrhoea (28 [15%] vs 11 [11%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 93 (48%) patients in the venetoclax group and 48 (50%) patients in the placebo group, with eight (4%) treatment-emergent fatal infections reported in the venetoclax group and none reported in the placebo group. Three deaths in the venetoclax group (two from pneumonia and one from septic shock) were considered treatment-related; no deaths in the placebo group were treatment-related.
INTERPRETATION: The primary endpoint was met with a significant improvement in independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival with venetoclax versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone. However, increased mortality was seen in the venetoclax group, mostly because of an increased rate of infections, highlighting the importance of appropriate selection of patients for this treatment option. FUNDING: AbbVie and Genentech.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33129376     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30525-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  71 in total

1.  Low dose venetoclax in combination with bortezomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients-a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Bernard Regidor; Marissa-Skye Goldwater; Jessica Wang; Sean Bujarski; Regina Swift; Benjamin Eades; Marsiye Emamy-Sadr; Shahrooz Eshagian; Gary Schwartz; Tanya M Spektor; James R Berenson
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 2.  MRD Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: Progress and Challenges.

Authors:  Luca Bertamini; Mattia D'Agostino; Francesca Gay
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: why, when, where.

Authors:  Andrew J Yee; Noopur Raje
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 4.  AL amyloidosis: untangling new therapies.

Authors:  Susan Bal; Heather Landau
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

5.  IgM-MM is predominantly a pre-germinal center disorder and has a distinct genomic and transcriptomic signature from WM.

Authors:  Abdul Hamid Bazarbachi; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Raphael Szalat; Anil Aktas Samur; Zachary Hunter; Masood Shammas; Jill Corre; Mariateresa Fulciniti; Kenneth C Anderson; Giovanni Parmigiani; Steven P Treon; Mohamad Mohty; Nikhil C Munshi; Mehmet Kemal Samur
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Updated Perspectives on the Management of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Linda Heimberg; Stefan Knop
Journal:  Oncol Res Treat       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.825

7.  Phase I Study of Venetoclax Plus Daratumumab and Dexamethasone, With or Without Bortezomib, in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma With and Without t(11;14).

Authors:  Nizar J Bahlis; Rachid Baz; Simon J Harrison; Hang Quach; Shir-Jing Ho; Annette Juul Vangsted; Torben Plesner; Philippe Moreau; Simon D Gibbs; Sheryl Coppola; Xiaoqing Yang; Abdullah Al Masud; Jeremy A Ross; Orlando Bueno; Jonathan L Kaufman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Targeted Therapies for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Christopher Chang-Yew Leow; Michael Sze Yuan Low
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-23

Review 9.  Belantamab Mafodotin for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: An Overview of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Massimo Offidani; Laura Corvatta; Sonia Morè; Attilio Olivieri
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 10.  Emerging therapies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CAR-T and beyond.

Authors:  Christopher T Su; J Christine Ye
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 17.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.