Literature DB >> 33128873

Intermittent schedules of the oral RAF-MEK inhibitor CH5126766/VS-6766 in patients with RAS/RAF-mutant solid tumours and multiple myeloma: a single-centre, open-label, phase 1 dose-escalation and basket dose-expansion study.

Christina Guo1, Maxime Chénard-Poirier1, Desamparados Roda1, Maria de Miguel1, Samuel J Harris1, Irene Moreno Candilejo1, Priya Sriskandarajah2, Wen Xu1, Mariana Scaranti1, Anastasia Constantinidou1, Jenny King1, Mona Parmar1, Alison J Turner1, Suzanne Carreira3, Ruth Riisnaes3, Laura Finneran4, Emma Hall4, Yuji Ishikawa5, Kiyohiko Nakai5, Nina Tunariu1, Bristi Basu6, Martin Kaiser7, Juanita Suzanne Lopez1, Anna Minchom1, Johann S de Bono1, Udai Banerji8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CH5126766 (also known as VS-6766, and previously named RO5126766), a novel MEK-pan-RAF inhibitor, has shown antitumour activity across various solid tumours; however, its initial development was limited by toxicity. We aimed to investigate the safety and toxicity profile of intermittent dosing schedules of CH5126766, and the antitumour activity of this drug in patients with solid tumours and multiple myeloma harbouring RAS-RAF-MEK pathway mutations.
METHODS: We did a single-centre, open-label, phase 1 dose-escalation and basket dose-expansion study at the Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust (London, UK). Patients were eligible for the study if they were aged 18 years or older, had cancers that were refractory to conventional treatment or for which no conventional therapy existed, and if they had a WHO performance status score of 0 or 1. For the dose-escalation phase, eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumours. For the basket dose-expansion phase, eligible patients had advanced or metastatic solid tumours or multiple myeloma harbouring RAS-RAF-MEK pathway mutations. During the dose-escalation phase, we evaluated three intermittent oral schedules (28-day cycles) in patients with solid tumours: (1) 4·0 mg or 3·2 mg CH5126766 three times per week; (2) 4·0 mg CH5126766 twice per week; and (3) toxicity-guided dose interruption schedule, in which treatment at the recommended phase 2 dose (4·0 mg CH5126766 twice per week) was de-escalated to 3 weeks on followed by 1 week off if patients had prespecified toxic effects (grade 2 or worse diarrhoea, rash, or creatinine phosphokinase elevation). In the basket dose-expansion phase, we evaluated antitumour activity at the recommended phase 2 dose, determined from the dose-escalation phase, in biomarker-selected patients. The primary endpoints were the recommended phase 2 dose at which no more than one out of six patients had a treatment-related dose-limiting toxicity, and the safety and toxicity profile of each dosing schedule. The key secondary endpoint was investigator-assessed response rate in the dose-expansion phase. Patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were evaluable for safety and patients who received one cycle of the study drug and underwent baseline disease assessment were evaluable for response. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02407509.
FINDINGS: Between June 5, 2013, and Jan 10, 2019, 58 eligible patients were enrolled to the study: 29 patients with solid tumours were included in the dose-escalation cohort and 29 patients with solid tumours or multiple myeloma were included in the basket dose-expansion cohort (12 non-small-cell lung cancer, five gynaecological malignancy, four colorectal cancer, one melanoma, and seven multiple myeloma). Median follow-up at the time of data cutoff was 2·3 months (IQR 1·6-3·5). Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 bilateral retinal pigment epithelial detachment in one patient who received 4·0 mg CH5126766 three times per week, and grade 3 rash (in two patients) and grade 3 creatinine phosphokinase elevation (in one patient) in those who received 3·2 mg CH5126766 three times per week. 4·0 mg CH5126766 twice per week (on Monday and Thursday or Tuesday and Friday) was established as the recommended phase 2 dose. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were rash (11 [19%] patients), creatinine phosphokinase elevation (six [11%]), hypoalbuminaemia (six [11%]), and fatigue (four [7%]). Five (9%) patients had serious treatment-related adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths. Eight (14%) of 57 patients died during the trial due to disease progression. Seven (27% [95% CI 11·6-47·8]) of 26 response-evaluable patients in the basket expansion achieved objective responses.
INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that highly intermittent schedules of a RAF-MEK inhibitor has antitumour activity across various cancers with RAF-RAS-MEK pathway mutations, and that this inhibitor is tolerable. CH5126766 used as a monotherapy and in combination regimens warrants further evaluation. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128873     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30464-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  12 in total

1.  Surufatinib - a novel oral agent for neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Anna Koumarianou; Gregory Kaltsas
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 2.  BRAF/MEK inhibition in NSCLC: mechanisms of resistance and how to overcome it.

Authors:  Ioannis Tsamis; Georgia Gomatou; Stavroula Porfyria Chachali; Ioannis Panagiotis Trontzas; Vasileios Patriarcheas; Emmanouil Panagiotou; Elias Kotteas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Targeting KRAS in pancreatic cancer: new drugs on the horizon.

Authors:  Sahar F Bannoura; Md Hafiz Uddin; Misako Nagasaka; Farzeen Fazili; Mohammed Najeeb Al-Hallak; Philip A Philip; Bassel El-Rayes; Asfar S Azmi
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 9.237

Review 4.  Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers.

Authors:  Gui-Hong Liu; Tao Chen; Xin Zhang; Xue-Lei Ma; Hua-Shan Shi
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-10-13

Review 5.  Expanding the Reach of Precision Oncology by Drugging All KRAS Mutants.

Authors:  Marco H Hofmann; Daniel Gerlach; Sandra Misale; Mark Petronczki; Norbert Kraut
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 38.272

Review 6.  KRAS and RAS-MAPK Pathway Deregulation in Mature B Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders.

Authors:  Elena Vendramini; Riccardo Bomben; Federico Pozzo; Tamara Bittolo; Erika Tissino; Valter Gattei; Antonella Zucchetto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Emerging strategies to target RAS signaling in human cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kun Chen; Yalei Zhang; Ling Qian; Peng Wang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 8.  Recent Developments in Targeting RAS Downstream Effectors for RAS-Driven Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Ozge Tatli; Gizem Dinler Doganay
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 9.  Targeting KRAS in NSCLC: Old Failures and New Options for "Non-G12c" Patients.

Authors:  Francesca Jacobs; Massimiliano Cani; Umberto Malapelle; Silvia Novello; Valerio Maria Napoli; Paolo Bironzo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Searching for treatments for non-G12C-KRAS mutant cancers.

Authors:  Christina Guo; Udai Banerji
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.