Ana Cristina Vargas1,2,3, Nima M Ardakani4,5, Daniel D Wong4,5, Fiona M Maclean1,2,6, Joseph Kattampallil7, Richard Boyle3,8, Leonardo Santos9, Anthony J Gill2,3,10. 1. Anatomical Pathology, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia. 2. Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia. 3. Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4. Anatomical Pathology, PathWest, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, Australia. 5. School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia. 6. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 7. Anatomical Pathology, Clinipath Pathology, Osborne Park, WA, Australia. 8. Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 9. Anatomical Pathology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia. 10. NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
AIMS: NTRK-rearranged sarcomas are emerging as a distinct class of sarcomas of particular importance in the era of targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to use array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) to explore the cytogenetic profile of six adult soft tissue sarcomas harbouring NTRK gene fusions. METHODS AND RESULTS: aCGH was performed on six adult soft tissue sarcomas with proven NTRK rearrangements [NTRK1, n = 1 (TPM3-NTRK1); NTRK2, n = 1 (MTMR2-NTRK2); NTRK3, n = 4 (two ETV6-NTRK3; two with unknown partners). The morphological patterns of these cases included inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour-like, fibrosarcoma/malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour-like, and Ewing sarcoma-like. On the basis of the number of chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs), ranging from two to 15 per sample, NTRK-associated sarcomas could be subdivided into two groups: one with a relatively simple karyotype (n = 2; median of three genomic alterations), and those with a more complex karyotype (n = 4; median of 11 genomic imbalances). Recurrent chromosomal CNVs included gains at chromosomes 6p, 1q, 7 (whole chromosome), and 12p, and losses at chromosomes 10q, 13q, 19q, and 9p. CONCLUSIONS: NTRK-rearranged sarcomas constitute a heterogeneous group of tumours that can show a relatively simple or a complex karyotype. Although there were some, but inconsistent, associations between karyotype complexity and morphology, our study showed that a more complex karyotype in this group of tumours appeared to correlate with more aggressive clinical behaviour. Gains at chromosome 6p and 1q were the most common recurrent genomic alterations, being present in 67% of the samples (4/6), followed by gains at chromosome 7, which were present in 50% of the samples (3/6).
AIMS: NTRK-rearranged sarcomas are emerging as a distinct class of sarcomas of particular importance in the era of targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to use array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) to explore the cytogenetic profile of six adult soft tissue sarcomas harbouring NTRK gene fusions. METHODS AND RESULTS: aCGH was performed on six adult soft tissue sarcomas with proven NTRK rearrangements [NTRK1, n = 1 (TPM3-NTRK1); NTRK2, n = 1 (MTMR2-NTRK2); NTRK3, n = 4 (two ETV6-NTRK3; two with unknown partners). The morphological patterns of these cases included inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour-like, fibrosarcoma/malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour-like, and Ewing sarcoma-like. On the basis of the number of chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs), ranging from two to 15 per sample, NTRK-associated sarcomas could be subdivided into two groups: one with a relatively simple karyotype (n = 2; median of three genomic alterations), and those with a more complex karyotype (n = 4; median of 11 genomic imbalances). Recurrent chromosomal CNVs included gains at chromosomes 6p, 1q, 7 (whole chromosome), and 12p, and losses at chromosomes 10q, 13q, 19q, and 9p. CONCLUSIONS: NTRK-rearranged sarcomas constitute a heterogeneous group of tumours that can show a relatively simple or a complex karyotype. Although there were some, but inconsistent, associations between karyotype complexity and morphology, our study showed that a more complex karyotype in this group of tumours appeared to correlate with more aggressive clinical behaviour. Gains at chromosome 6p and 1q were the most common recurrent genomic alterations, being present in 67% of the samples (4/6), followed by gains at chromosome 7, which were present in 50% of the samples (3/6).