Literature DB >> 33128469

Bayesian Gaussian distributional regression models for more efficient norm estimation.

Lieke Voncken1,2, Thomas Kneib3, Casper J Albers1, Nikolaus Umlauf4, Marieke E Timmerman1.   

Abstract

A test score on a psychological test is usually expressed as a normed score, representing its position relative to test scores in a reference population. These typically depend on predictor(s) such as age. The test score distribution conditional on predictors is estimated using regression, which may need large normative samples to estimate the relationships between the predictor(s) and the distribution characteristics properly. In this study, we examine to what extent this burden can be alleviated by using prior information in the estimation of new norms with Bayesian Gaussian distributional regression. In a simulation study, we investigate to what extent this norm estimation is more efficient and how robust it is to prior model deviations. We varied the prior type, prior misspecification and sample size. In our simulated conditions, using a fixed effects prior resulted in more efficient norm estimation than a weakly informative prior as long as the prior misspecification was not age dependent. With the proposed method and reasonable prior information, the same norm precision can be achieved with a smaller normative sample, at least in empirical problems similar to our simulated conditions. This may help test developers to achieve cost-efficient high-quality norms. The method is illustrated using empirical normative data from the IDS-2 intelligence test.
© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BAMLSS; continuous test norming; norming efficiency; psychological tests; robustness

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128469      PMCID: PMC7891623          DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  6 in total

1.  Sample Size Requirements for Traditional and Regression-Based Norms.

Authors:  Hannah E M Oosterhuis; L Andries van der Ark; Klaas Sijtsma
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2015-05-04

2.  Model Selection in Continuous Test Norming With GAMLSS.

Authors:  Lieke Voncken; Casper J Albers; Marieke E Timmerman
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2017-06-29

3.  A Continuous Solution to the Norming Problem.

Authors:  Alexandra Lenhard; Wolfgang Lenhard; Sebastian Suggate; Robin Segerer
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2016-07-02

4.  Continuous norming: implications for the WAIS-R.

Authors:  R A Zachary; R L Gorsuch
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1985-01

5.  Norming clinical questionnaires with multiple regression: the Pain Cognition List.

Authors:  Gerard J P Van Breukelen; Johan W S Vlaeyen
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2005-09

6.  Continuous norming of psychometric tests: A simulation study of parametric and semi-parametric approaches.

Authors:  Alexandra Lenhard; Wolfgang Lenhard; Sebastian Gary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.