Literature DB >> 33128332

Calculating and estimating second cancer risk from breast radiotherapy using Monte Carlo code with internal body scatter for each out-of-field organ.

Takeshi Takata1, Kenshiro Shiraishi2, Shinobu Kumagai3, Norikazu Arai3, Takenori Kobayashi1, Hiroshi Oba2, Takahide Okamoto1,3, Jun'ichi Kotoku1,3.   

Abstract

Out-of-field organs are not commonly designated as dose calculation targets during radiation therapy treatment planning, but they might entail risks of second cancer. Risk components include specific internal body scatter, which is a dominant source of out-of-field doses, and head leakage, which can be reduced by external shielding. Our simulation study quantifies out-of-field organ doses and estimates second cancer risks attributable to internal body scatter in whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without additional regional nodal radiotherapy (RNRT), respectively, for right and left breast cancer using Monte Carlo code PHITS. Simulations were conducted using a complete whole-body female model. Second cancer risk was estimated using the calculated doses with a concept of excess absolute risk. Simulation results revealed marked differences between WBRT alone and WBRT plus RNRT in out-of-field organ doses. The ratios of mean doses between them were as large as 3.5-8.0 for the head and neck region and about 1.5-6.6 for the lower abdominal region. Potentially, most out-of-field organs had excess absolute risks of less than 1 per 10,000 persons-year. Our study surveyed the respective contributions of internal body scatter to out-of-field organ doses and second cancer risks in breast radiotherapy on this intact female model.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulation; breast cancer; low-dose bath; radiotherapy; second cancer risk

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128332      PMCID: PMC7769416          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  41 in total

1.  Peridose, a software program to calculate the dose outside the primary beam in radiation therapy.

Authors:  P H van der Giessen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.

Authors:  Ann Van Esch; Laura Tillikainen; Jukka Pyykkonen; Mikko Tenhunen; Hannu Helminen; Sami Siljamäki; Jyrki Alakuijala; Marta Paiusco; Mauro Lori; Dominique P Huyskens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions.

Authors:  D A Low; W B Harms; S Mutic; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The calculated risk of fatal secondary malignancies from intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Mohammad Salehpour; David S Followill; Marilyn Stovall; Deborah A Kuban; R Allen White; Isaac I Rosen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Second cancer risk after 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT for breast cancer.

Authors:  Yasser Abo-Madyan; Muhammad Hammad Aziz; Moamen M O M Aly; Frank Schneider; Elena Sperk; Sven Clausen; Frank A Giordano; Carsten Herskind; Volker Steil; Frederik Wenz; Gerhard Glatting
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Peripheral dose from megavolt beams.

Authors:  B A Fraass; J van de Geijn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Long-term mortality from heart disease and lung cancer after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: prospective cohort study of about 300,000 women in US SEER cancer registries.

Authors:  Sarah C Darby; Paul McGale; Carolyn W Taylor; Richard Peto
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  A comparison of out-of-field dose and its constituent components for intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conformal radiation therapy: implications for carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Jeremy D Ruben; Craig M Lancaster; Phillip Jones; Ryan L Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998.

Authors:  D L Preston; E Ron; S Tokuoka; S Funamoto; N Nishi; M Soda; K Mabuchi; K Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Second primary cancers after adjuvant radiotherapy in early breast cancer patients: a national population based study under the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG).

Authors:  Trine Grantzau; Lene Mellemkjær; Jens Overgaard
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Medical application of particle and heavy ion transport code system PHITS.

Authors:  Takuya Furuta; Tatsuhiko Sato
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-06-30

2.  Influence of Specific Treatment Parameters on Nontarget and Out-of-Field Doses in a Phantom Model of Prostate SBRT with CyberKnife and TrueBeam.

Authors:  Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Agnieszka Skrobala; Piotr Romanski; Adam Ryczkowski; Wiktoria Suchorska; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Igor Piotrowski; Dorota Borowicz; Kinga Graczyk; Natalia Matuszak; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-23

3.  Development of a quasi-humanoid phantom to perform dosimetric and radiobiological measurements for out-of-field doses from external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Agnieszka Skrobala; Piotr Romanski; Adam Ryczkowski; Wiktoria Suchorska; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Igor Piotrowski; Dorota Borowicz; Natalia Matuszak; Julian Malicki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.