Literature DB >> 33128279

The restoration of root filled teeth: a review of the clinical literature.

B Bhuva1, M Giovarruscio1,2, N Rahim1, K Bitter3, F Mannocci1.   

Abstract

Clinicians often face dilemmas regarding the most appropriate way to restore a tooth following root canal treatment. Whilst there is established consensus on the importance of the ferrule effect on the predictable restoration of root filled teeth, other factors, such as residual tooth volume, tooth location, number of proximal contacts, timing of the definitive restoration and the presence of cracks, have been reported to influence restoration and tooth survival. The continued evolution of dental materials and techniques, combined with a trend towards more conservative endodontic-restorative procedures, prompts re-evaluation of the scientific literature. The aim of this literature review was to provide an updated overview of the existing clinical literature relating to the restoration of root filled teeth. An electronic literature search of the PubMed, Ovid (via EMBASE) and MEDLINE (via EMBASE) databases up to July 2020 was performed to identify articles that related the survival of root filled teeth and/or restoration type. The following and other terms were searched: restoration, crown, onlay, root canal, root filled, post, clinical, survival, success. Wherever possible, only clinical studies were selected for the literature review. Full texts of the identified articles were independently screened by two reviewers according to pre-defined criteria. This review identifies the main clinical factors influencing the survival of teeth and restorations following root canal treatment in vivo and discusses the data related to specific restoration type on clinical survival.
© 2020 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  crown; cuspal coverage restoration; endodontic-restorative treatment; restoration of root filled teeth; root canal post; tooth survival

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128279     DOI: 10.1111/iej.13438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  5 in total

1.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Flowable Short Fibre-Reinforced Resin Composite-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Apoorva Sharma; Lourdusamy Vijay Amirtharaj; Kavitha Sanjeev; Sekar Mahalaxmi
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2022-06

Review 2.  Minimal Invasive Endodontics: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jaydip Marvaniya; Kishan Agarwal; Dhaval N Mehta; Nirav Parmar; Ritwik Shyamal; Jenee Patel
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  Prognostic validity of the Periapical and Endodontic Status Scale for the radiographically assessed 2-year treatment outcomes in teeth with apical periodontitis: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Jelena Gudac; Kristina Hellén-Halme; Vita Machiulskiene
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Does Multi-Fiber-Reinforced Composite-Post Influence the Filling Ability and the Bond Strength in Root Canal?

Authors:  Naji Kharouf; Salvatore Sauro; Hamdi Jmal; Ammar Eid; Mohamed Karrout; Nadia Bahlouli; Youssef Haikel; Davide Mancino
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29

Review 5.  Present status and future directions: vertical root fractures in root filled teeth.

Authors:  Shanon Patel; Bhavin Bhuva; Rahul Bose
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.165

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.