Literature DB >> 33128190

Prevalence of germline variants in consensus moderate-to-high-risk predisposition genes to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2-negative Brazilian patients.

Renan Gomes1, Pricila da Silva Spinola2, Ayslan Castro Brant1, Bruna Palma Matta1, Caroline Macedo Nascimento2, Silvia Maria de Aquino Paes1,3, Cibele Rodrigues Bonvicino1, Anna Claudia Evangelista Dos Santos1, Miguel Angelo Martins Moreira4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify and classify genetic variants in consensus moderate-to-high-risk predisposition genes associated with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC), in BRCA1/2-negative patients from Brazil.
METHODS: The study comprised 126 index patients who met NCCN clinical criteria and tested negative for all coding exons and intronic flanking regions of BRCA1/2 genes. Multiplex PCR-based assays were designed to cover the complete coding regions and flanking splicing sites of six genes implicated in HBOC. Sequencing was performed on HiSeq2500 Genome Analyzer.
RESULTS: Overall, we identified 488 unique variants. We identified five patients (3.97%) that harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in four genes: ATM (1), CHEK2 (2), PALB2 (1), and TP53 (1). One hundred and thirty variants were classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), 10 of which were predicted to disrupt mRNA splicing (seven non-coding variants and three coding variants), while other six missense VUS were classified as probably damaging by prediction algorithms.
CONCLUSION: A detailed mutational profile of non-BRCA genes is still being described in Brazil. In this study, we contributed to filling this gap, by providing important data on the diversity of genetic variants in a Brazilian high-risk patient cohort. ATM, CHEK2, PALB2 and TP53 are well established as HBOC predisposition genes, and the identification of deleterious variants in such actionable genes contributes to clinical management of probands and relatives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; HBOC; Hereditary cancer; Massive parallel sequencing; Ovarian cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128190     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05985-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  48 in total

1.  Clinical Actionability of Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Andrea Desmond; Allison W Kurian; Michele Gabree; Meredith A Mills; Michael J Anderson; Yuya Kobayashi; Nora Horick; Shan Yang; Kristen M Shannon; Nadine Tung; James M Ford; Stephen E Lincoln; Leif W Ellisen
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  A Antoniou; P D P Pharoah; S Narod; H A Risch; J E Eyfjord; J L Hopper; N Loman; H Olsson; O Johannsson; A Borg; B Pasini; P Radice; S Manoukian; D M Eccles; N Tang; E Olah; H Anton-Culver; E Warner; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; B Gorski; H Tulinius; S Thorlacius; H Eerola; H Nevanlinna; K Syrjäkoski; O-P Kallioniemi; D Thompson; C Evans; J Peto; F Lalloo; D G Evans; D F Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Power of pedigree likelihood analysis in extended pedigrees to classify rare variants of uncertain significance in cancer risk genes.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Rosenthal; John Michael O Ranola; Brian H Shirts
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  Cancer treatment according to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Kara N Maxwell; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Inherited mutations in 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes among a large triple-negative breast cancer cohort unselected for family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Fergus J Couch; Steven N Hart; Priyanka Sharma; Amanda Ewart Toland; Xianshu Wang; Penelope Miron; Janet E Olson; Andrew K Godwin; V Shane Pankratz; Curtis Olswold; Seth Slettedahl; Emily Hallberg; Lucia Guidugli; Jaime I Davila; Matthias W Beckmann; Wolfgang Janni; Brigitte Rack; Arif B Ekici; Dennis J Slamon; Irene Konstantopoulou; Florentia Fostira; Athanassios Vratimos; George Fountzilas; Liisa M Pelttari; William J Tapper; Lorraine Durcan; Simon S Cross; Robert Pilarski; Charles L Shapiro; Jennifer Klemp; Song Yao; Judy Garber; Angela Cox; Hiltrud Brauch; Christine Ambrosone; Heli Nevanlinna; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Susan L Slager; Celine M Vachon; Diana M Eccles; Peter A Fasching
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Points to consider: is there evidence to support BRCA1/2 and other inherited breast cancer genetic testing for all breast cancer patients? A statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Doreen Agnese; Mary Daly; Albert La Spada; Jennifer Litton; Myra Wick; Susan Klugman; Edward D Esplin; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fergus J Couch; Hermela Shimelis; Chunling Hu; Steven N Hart; Eric C Polley; Jie Na; Emily Hallberg; Raymond Moore; Abigail Thomas; Jenna Lilyquist; Bingjian Feng; Rachel McFarland; Tina Pesaran; Robert Huether; Holly LaDuca; Elizabeth C Chao; David E Goldgar; Jill S Dolinsky
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk.

Authors:  Douglas F Easton; Paul D P Pharoah; Antonis C Antoniou; Marc Tischkowitz; Sean V Tavtigian; Katherine L Nathanson; Peter Devilee; Alfons Meindl; Fergus J Couch; Melissa Southey; David E Goldgar; D Gareth R Evans; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Nazneen Rahman; Mark Robson; Susan M Domchek; William D Foulkes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variant prevalence among the first 10,000 patients referred for next-generation cancer panel testing.

Authors:  Lisa R Susswein; Megan L Marshall; Rachel Nusbaum; Kristen J Vogel Postula; Scott M Weissman; Lauren Yackowski; Erica M Vaccari; Jeffrey Bissonnette; Jessica K Booker; M Laura Cremona; Federica Gibellini; Patricia D Murphy; Daniel E Pineda-Alvarez; Guido D Pollevick; Zhixiong Xu; Gabi Richard; Sherri Bale; Rachel T Klein; Kathleen S Hruska; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Thomas P Slavin; Kara N Maxwell; Jenna Lilyquist; Joseph Vijai; Kenneth Offit; Katherine L Nathanson; Fergus J Couch; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven N Hart; Vignesh Ravichandran; Tinu Thomas; Ann Maria; Danylo Villano; Kasmintan A Schrader; Raymond Moore; Chunling Hu; Bradley Wubbenhorst; Brandon M Wenz; Kurt D'Andrea; Mark E Robson; Paolo Peterlongo; Bernardo Bonanni; James M Ford; Judy E Garber; Susan M Domchek; Csilla Szabo; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-06-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Frequency of germline genetic variants in women with a personal or family history of breast cancer from Brazil.

Authors:  Júlia Zanon Pereira; Juliana Garcia Carneiro; Mariana Sousa Vieira; Bruna Mattioly Valente; Pâmella Zorzan de Oliveira; Carolina Lins Mello; Caroline Leonel Vasconcelos de Campos; Karina Braga Gomes
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Novel Insights From the Germline Landscape of Breast Cancer in Brazil.

Authors:  Daniel Barbalho; Renata Sandoval; Erika Santos; Janina Pisani; Carla Quirino; Bernardo Garicochea; Benedito Rossi; Maria Isabel Achatz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Detection of germline variants in Brazilian breast cancer patients using multigene panel testing.

Authors:  Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini; Danilo Vilela Viana; João Paulo Fumio Whitaker Kitajima; Vinícius Marques Rocha; Rossana Verónica Mendoza López; Yonglan Zheng; Érika Freitas; Fabiola Paoli Mendes Monteiro; André Valim; David Schlesinger; Fernando Kok; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Somatic DNA Damage Response and Homologous Repair Gene Alterations and Its Association With Tumor Variant Burden in Breast Cancer Patients With Occupational Exposure to Pesticides.

Authors:  Thalita Basso Scandolara; Sara Ferreira Valle; Cristiane Esteves Teixeira; Nicole de Miranda Scherer; Elvismary Molina de Armas; Carolina Furtado; Mariana Boroni; Hellen Dos Santos Jaques; Fernanda Mara Alves; Daniel Rech; Carolina Panis; Cibele Rodrigues Bonvicino
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 5.  A multidisciplinary approach remains the best strategy to improve and strengthen the management of ovarian cancer (Review).

Authors:  Luca Falzone; Giuseppa Scandurra; Valentina Lombardo; Giuseppe Gattuso; Alessandro Lavoro; Andrea Benedetto Distefano; Giuseppe Scibilia; Paolo Scollo
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.650

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.