Literature DB >> 33128183

MRI-guided breast biopsy based on diffusion-weighted imaging: a feasibility study.

Stefania Montemezzi1, Giuseppe Cardano2, Silvia Storer1, Nicolò Cardobi1, Carlo Cavedon3, Lucia Camera1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the feasibility of DWI for lesion targeting in MRI-guided breast biopsies. Furthermore, it assessed device positioning on DWI during biopsy procedures.
METHODS: A total of 87 biopsy procedures (5/87 bilateral) consecutively performed between March 2019 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed: in these procedures, a preliminary DWI sequence (b = 1300 s/mm2) was acquired to assess lesion detectability. We included 64/87 procedures on lesions detectable at DWI; DWI sequences were added to the standard protocol to localize lesion and biopsy device and to assess the site marker correct positioning.
RESULTS: Mass lesions ranged from 5 to 48 mm, with a mean size of 10.7 mm and a median size of 8 mm. Non-mass lesions ranged from 7 to 90 mm, with a mean size of 33.9 mm and a median size of 31 mm. Positioning of the coaxial system was confirmed on both T1-weighted and DWI sequences. At DWI, the biopsy needle was detectable in 62/64 (96.9%) cases; it was not visible in 2/64 (3.1%) cases. The site marker was always identified using T1-weighted imaging; a final DWI sequence was acquired in 44/64 cases (68.8%). In 42/44 cases (95.5%), the marker was recognizable at DWI.
CONCLUSIONS: DWI can be used as a cost-effective, highly reliable technique for targeting both mass and non-mass lesions, with a minimum size of 5 mm, detectable at pre-procedural DWI. DWI is also a feasible technique to localize the biopsy device and to confirm the deployment of the site marker. KEY POINTS: • MRI-guided breast biopsy is performed in referral centers by an expert dedicated staff, based on prior MR imaging; contrast agent administration is usually needed for lesion targeting. • DWI represents a feasible, highly reliable technique for lesion targeting, avoiding contrast agent administration. • DWI allows a precise localization of both biopsy needle device and site marker.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Breast; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Feasibility studies; Magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128183     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07396-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

1.  Accuracy of combined dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Min Tang; Zhiqian Min; Jun Lu; Xiaoyan Lei; Xiaoling Zhang
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Nicky H G M Peters; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Willem P T M Mali; Karel G M Moons; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Clinical application of bilateral high temporal and spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast at 7 T.

Authors:  K Pinker; W Bogner; P Baltzer; S Trattnig; S Gruber; O Abeyakoon; M Bernathova; O Zaric; P Dubsky; Z Bago-Horvath; M Weber; D Leithner; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter: Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Linda Moy; Elizabeth J Sutton; Ritse M Mann; Michael Weber; Sunitha B Thakur; Maxine S Jochelson; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Elizabeth A Morris; Pascal At Baltzer; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Breast MRI: State of the Art.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Nariya Cho; Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monique D Dorrius; Hildebrand Dijkstra; Matthijs Oudkerk; Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for Breast MR imaging (DETECT Trial).

Authors:  Laura Martincich; Matthieu Faivre-Pierret; Christian M Zechmann; Stefano Corcione; Harrie C M van den Bosch; Wei-Jun Peng; Antonella Petrillo; Katja C Siegmann; Johannes T Heverhagen; Pietro Panizza; Hans-Björn Gehl; Felix Diekmann; Federica Pediconi; Lin Ma; Fiona J Gilbert; Francesco Sardanelli; Paolo Belli; Marco Salvatore; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; Claudia M Weiss; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Amy M Schell; Kari Rosenkranz; Petra J Lewis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Breast MRI in the era of diffusion weighted imaging: do we still need signal-intensity time curves?

Authors:  Matthias Dietzel; Stephan Ellmann; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Paola Clauser; Evelyn Wenkel; Michael Uder; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast-a consensus and mission statement from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group.

Authors:  Pascal Baltzer; Ritse M Mann; Mami Iima; Eric E Sigmund; Paola Clauser; Fiona J Gilbert; Laura Martincich; Savannah C Partridge; Andrew Patterson; Katja Pinker; Fabienne Thibault; Julia Camps-Herrero; Denis Le Bihan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.