Literature DB >> 33127655

Microbiome-derived metabolome as a potential predictor of response to cancer immunotherapy.

Agnieszka Beata Malczewski1,2,3, Severine Navarro4,5, Jermaine Ig Coward6,2, Natkunam Ketheesan3.   

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy with checkpoint blockade has become standard of care treatment for numerous cancer types. Despite this, robust predictive biomarkers are lacking. There is increasing evidence that the host microbiome is a predictor of immunotherapy response, although the optimal host microbiome has not been defined. Metabolomics is a new area of medicine that aims to analyze the metabolic profile of a biological system. The microbiome-derived metabolome (fecal and serum) represents the end products of microbial metabolism and these may be functionally more important than the distinct bacterial species that comprise a favorable microbiome. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) are metabolites produced by gut microbiota and have a role in T cell homeostasis, including differentiation of regulatory T cells. Recent studies have confirmed differential expression of SCFA for immunotherapy responders compared with non-responders. We propose that the microbiome metabolome, with a focus on SCFA may be a novel predictive biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; immunotherapy; metabolic networks and pathways; tumor

Year:  2020        PMID: 33127655      PMCID: PMC7604862          DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunother Cancer        ISSN: 2051-1426            Impact factor:   13.751


Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape in medical oncology and has led to improvements in survival across many solid tumor subtypes. Despite this, a significant proportion of cancer patients still do not have a durable response to immunotherapy. Currently available biomarkers are unable to reliably select patients for optimal clinical benefit. Recently, investigators have looked at host-based factors as possible predictors of response to immunotherapy. Multiple studies have confirmed an association between a favorable microbiome and enhanced responses to immunotherapy. Despite this, there has been no consensus over which microbial species enhance response rates to immunotherapy treatment.1 The activity of the microbiome is reflected through its metabolic profile or metabolome and can be quantitatively assessed through mass spectrometry-based techniques. Correlation of metabolomic data together with taxonomic composition of the microbiome may enable identification of a metabolic signature that is unique to immunotherapy responders. This metabolic signature could have application as a predictor of response to cancer immunotherapy. The microbiome consists of the trillions of commensal microbes that live within their human hosts.1 The microbiome has been shown to influence immunity and help regulate responses to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.2 Clinical trials continue to investigate means of modulating the microbiome to elicit more favorable responses to immunotherapy.1 In a landmark study looking at melanoma patients undergoing anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, Gopalakrishnan et al (2018) found significant differences in the microbial composition and diversity of responders, compared with non-responders.2 Those patients with a sustained response to treatment had a significantly higher fecal microbiome alpha diversity (p<0.01) together with a greater abundance of bacteria from the Ruminococcaceae family.2 Other investigators have similarly assessed microbiome composition of patients undergoing checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The taxa that have been associated with favorable responses have varied between studies.1 2 Conversely, low microbiome diversity, including recent use of antibiotics prior to initiation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy have been associated with poorer treatment responses, although these findings have not been universal.1 Possible techniques to modulate the microbiome include the use of dietary intervention, prebiotics or probiotics, bacteria consortia or fecal transplantation.1 Most of these techniques have foreseeable problems in terms of the difficulties associated with reproducing the complex community that constitutes a ‘favorable microbiome’. The practicalities and standardization of protocols for techniques such as fecal transplant are challenging and not entirely risk-free. In view of this, it may not be realistic to routinely integrate such modalities into daily clinical practice. Metabolomics is a relatively new field of medicine that investigates the set of metabolites expressed by a particular biological system. Metabolic signatures have already been developed for several chronic disease states, including diabetes, cardiovascular disease and chronic respiratory diseases.3 Analysis can be performed on bodily fluids including serum, urine, feces, saliva as well as tumor tissue. Cancer metabolomics is an active and expanding field. In the setting of checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the metabolome could provide insight into the functional microbiome-host interaction and may enable a greater understanding of whether the metabolic activity of bacterial communities is more important than their exact taxonomic constitution. Commensal microorganisms present in the gut have important roles in regulation of local, innate and adaptive immunity. Microbial metabolic activity in the gut can drive diverse pathological systemic immune responses including autoimmune conditions such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and asthma.4 5 For example, in neonates, distinct fecal metabolomes are associated with an excess of pro-inflammatory metabolites, which promote CD4 T cell dysfunction resulting in childhood atopy and asthma.4 A key function of gut bacteria is to convert dietary substrates into metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, phenolic compounds, N-nitroso compounds or bile acids.2 Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) have been implicated as key metabolites in the regulation of T cell homeostasis6 (figure 1). Depending on immunological conditions, including presence or absence of key cytokines, SCFA were able to regulate T cell differentiation into either effector or regulatory (Treg) cells.6 The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor therapy is affected by endocrine, metabolic and environmental conditions. A favorable balance of T effector cells: Treg cells is required in the tumor microenvironment in order to enhance checkpoint inhibitor efficacy.5 Certainly, the immunosuppressive activity of Tregs in the tumor microenvironment is considered detrimental to cancer immunotherapy outcomes.5 In keeping with this, Treg depletion has also been put forward as a possible future treatment strategy that could be used in combination with current checkpoint blockade.5 Thus, it is possible that the common end metabolic products of diverse microbial communities could shape the immune response in patients on checkpoint inhibitor therapy through effects on T cell homeostasis or through other as yet undiscovered mechanisms (figure 1). These metabolic products could also be a potential therapeutic target for modulating the immune response.
Figure 1

Microbiome-derived metabolome as a predictor of response to cancer immunotherapy. Responses to checkpoint immunotherapy have been associated with a diverse fecal microbiome. Short-chain fatty acids, including acetate (C2), propionate (C3) and butyrate (C4) are products of bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber and are known to induce T cell differentiation (T0). The serum or fecal microbiome-derived metabolome can quantify the metabolic products of microbial communities and could be used as a predictive biomarker for identifying long-term responders to checkpoint immunotherapy (right panel). Short-chain fatty acids can promote both effector and regulatory T cell subsets, depending on the cytokine and immunological milieu (middle and right panel). Optimal conditions for checkpoint inhibitor therapy to facilitate tumor cell killing include increased T effector cell to Treg cell ratio.

Microbiome-derived metabolome as a predictor of response to cancer immunotherapy. Responses to checkpoint immunotherapy have been associated with a diverse fecal microbiome. Short-chain fatty acids, including acetate (C2), propionate (C3) and butyrate (C4) are products of bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber and are known to induce T cell differentiation (T0). The serum or fecal microbiome-derived metabolome can quantify the metabolic products of microbial communities and could be used as a predictive biomarker for identifying long-term responders to checkpoint immunotherapy (right panel). Short-chain fatty acids can promote both effector and regulatory T cell subsets, depending on the cytokine and immunological milieu (middle and right panel). Optimal conditions for checkpoint inhibitor therapy to facilitate tumor cell killing include increased T effector cell to Treg cell ratio. Studies to date have looked at the emerging role of metabolomic profiling and its association with immunotherapy efficacy. There is increasing evidence that systemic SCFA may modulate checkpoint inhibitor responses in humans.7 8 Nomura et al (2020) published a prospective cohort study of 52 patients with metastatic malignancy who were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab.7 Both fecal and plasma concentrations of SCFA were measured for patients, who were categorized as either responders or non-responders. Fecal concentrations of acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and valeric acid and plasma concentrations of propionic acid and isovaleric acid were significantly elevated for responders, compared with non-responders (p<0.05).7 Similarly, Botticelli et al (2020) assessed the fecal microbiome metabolome for 11 patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing treatment with nivolumab. Investigators found that patients with early disease progression (defined as disease progression within 3 months of starting nivolumab) had a microbiome metabolome that was characterized by low levels of both SCFA (propionic, butyric, acetic and valeric acids) and amino acids (lysine, isoleucine and glutamic) but high levels of alkanes, methyl-ketones and p-cresol.8 In contrast to this, a recently published study of (n=85) metastatic melanoma patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 therapy confirmed that low baseline butyrate and low baseline propionate (serum) were associated with increased progression free survival (p=0.0015 and p=0.0029, respectively).9 As these patients were receiving single agent treatment, further studies are required to investigate the effects of SCFA on treatment outcomes in patients receiving combination immunotherapy. Mouse studies suggested that butyrate reduced the efficacy of CTLA-4 blockade by limiting CTLA-4 induced dendritic cell maturation together with decreased ICOS expression on T cells and reduced accumulation of memory T cells.9 Together, these recent studies suggest that SCFA are key regulators of systemic immunity during checkpoint inhibitor therapy and may be surrogate markers of specific microbial communities. Apart from utility as a predictive biomarker, identifying and correcting certain metabolic derangements could potentially be used to help re-sensitize patients who may be identified as resistant to immunotherapy or who have developed progressive disease. The therapeutic effect of SCFA supplementation is currently under study in the setting of inflammatory bowel disease, where dysbiosis is prominent.10 To date, administration of SCFA either through oral administration or through the use of enemas has not had consistent clinical results.10 Integration of metabolomics and gut microbiota profiling is an excellent and obvious target for future use as both a predictive biomarker and as a point for manipulating the host immune response. Host related factors have long been overlooked in favor of tumor-related factors in oncology, which is a significant oversight. SCFA are known to be key regulators of immune function and appear to be expressed differentially between immunotherapy responders and non-responders. We hypothesize that the serial evaluation of the microbiome-derived metabolome in a large cohort of patients on immunotherapy will enable the identification of a unique SCFA metabolic signature that may be robust enough to act as predictive biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy. Furthermore, this may become a therapeutic target for enhancing responses to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Chronic Diseases and Lifestyle Biomarkers Identification by Metabolomics.

Authors:  Annalaura Mastrangelo; Coral Barbas
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Modulating the microbiome to improve therapeutic response in cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer L McQuade; Carrie R Daniel; Beth A Helmink; Jennifer A Wargo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients.

Authors:  V Gopalakrishnan; C N Spencer; L Nezi; A Reuben; M C Andrews; T V Karpinets; P A Prieto; D Vicente; K Hoffman; S C Wei; A P Cogdill; L Zhao; C W Hudgens; D S Hutchinson; T Manzo; M Petaccia de Macedo; T Cotechini; T Kumar; W S Chen; S M Reddy; R Szczepaniak Sloane; J Galloway-Pena; H Jiang; P L Chen; E J Shpall; K Rezvani; A M Alousi; R F Chemaly; S Shelburne; L M Vence; P C Okhuysen; V B Jensen; A G Swennes; F McAllister; E Marcelo Riquelme Sanchez; Y Zhang; E Le Chatelier; L Zitvogel; N Pons; J L Austin-Breneman; L E Haydu; E M Burton; J M Gardner; E Sirmans; J Hu; A J Lazar; T Tsujikawa; A Diab; H Tawbi; I C Glitza; W J Hwu; S P Patel; S E Woodman; R N Amaria; M A Davies; J E Gershenwald; P Hwu; J E Lee; J Zhang; L M Coussens; Z A Cooper; P A Futreal; C R Daniel; N J Ajami; J F Petrosino; M T Tetzlaff; P Sharma; J P Allison; R R Jenq; J A Wargo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Resistance Mechanisms to Immune-Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer: Tumor-Intrinsic and -Extrinsic Factors.

Authors:  Jonathan M Pitt; Marie Vétizou; Romain Daillère; María Paula Roberti; Takahiro Yamazaki; Bertrand Routy; Patricia Lepage; Ivo Gomperts Boneca; Mathias Chamaillard; Guido Kroemer; Laurence Zitvogel
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 31.745

5.  Systemic short chain fatty acids limit antitumor effect of CTLA-4 blockade in hosts with cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Antonio Ascierto; Caroline Robert; Clélia Coutzac; Jean-Mehdi Jouniaux; Angelo Paci; Julien Schmidt; Domenico Mallardo; Atmane Seck; Vahe Asvatourian; Lydie Cassard; Patrick Saulnier; Ludovic Lacroix; Paul-Louis Woerther; Aurore Vozy; Marie Naigeon; Laetitia Nebot-Bral; Mélanie Desbois; Ester Simeone; Christine Mateus; Lisa Boselli; Jonathan Grivel; Emilie Soularue; Patricia Lepage; Franck Carbonnel; Nathalie Chaput
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Gut metabolomics profiling of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients under immunotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Andrea Botticelli; Pamela Vernocchi; Federico Marini; Andrea Quagliariello; Bruna Cerbelli; Sofia Reddel; Federica Del Chierico; Francesca Di Pietro; Raffaele Giusti; Alberta Tomassini; Ottavia Giampaoli; Alfredo Miccheli; Ilaria Grazia Zizzari; Marianna Nuti; Lorenza Putignani; Paolo Marchetti
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Short-chain fatty acids induce both effector and regulatory T cells by suppression of histone deacetylases and regulation of the mTOR-S6K pathway.

Authors:  J Park; M Kim; S G Kang; A H Jannasch; B Cooper; J Patterson; C H Kim
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 7.313

8.  Neonatal gut microbiota associates with childhood multisensitized atopy and T cell differentiation.

Authors:  Kei E Fujimura; Alexandra R Sitarik; Suzanne Havstad; Din L Lin; Sophia Levan; Douglas Fadrosh; Ariane R Panzer; Brandon LaMere; Elze Rackaityte; Nicholas W Lukacs; Ganesa Wegienka; Homer A Boushey; Dennis R Ownby; Edward M Zoratti; Albert M Levin; Christine C Johnson; Susan V Lynch
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Association of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in the Gut Microbiome With Clinical Response to Treatment With Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab in Patients With Solid Cancer Tumors.

Authors:  Motoo Nomura; Ryosuke Nagatomo; Keitaro Doi; Juko Shimizu; Kiichiro Baba; Tomoki Saito; Shigemi Matsumoto; Koichi Inoue; Manabu Muto
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 10.  Immunomodulating Activity and Therapeutic Effects of Short Chain Fatty Acids and Tryptophan Post-biotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Edda Russo; Francesco Giudici; Camilla Fiorindi; Ferdinando Ficari; Stefano Scaringi; Amedeo Amedei
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Gut microbiome in gastrointestinal cancer: a friend or foe?

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yoshifumi Baba; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Xi Gu; Jun Zhang; Daichi Nomoto; Kazuo Okadome; Hideo Baba; Peng Qiu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 10.750

Review 2.  Cancer-associated inflammation: pathophysiology and clinical significance.

Authors:  Piotr Pęczek; Monika Gajda; Kacper Rutkowski; Marta Fudalej; Andrzej Deptała; Anna M Badowska-Kozakiewicz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.322

3.  Gut Dysbiosis and Fecal Calprotectin Predict Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Antonio Gasbarrini; Maurizio Pompili; Francesca Romana Ponziani; Angela De Luca; Anna Picca; Emanuele Marzetti; Valentina Petito; Federica Del Chierico; Sofia Reddel; Francesco Paroni Sterbini; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Lorenza Putignani
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 4.  Modulatory effects of gut microbiome in cancer immunotherapy: A novel paradigm for blockade of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Sama Rezasoltani; Abbas Yadegar; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Optimizing therapeutic outcomes of immune checkpoint blockade by a microbial tryptophan metabolite.

Authors:  Giorgia Renga; Emilia Nunzi; Marilena Pariano; Matteo Puccetti; Marina Maria Bellet; Giuseppe Pieraccini; Fiorella D'Onofrio; Ilaria Santarelli; Claudia Stincardini; Franco Aversa; Francesca Riuzzi; Cinzia Antognelli; Marco Gargaro; Oxana Bereshchenko; Maurizio Ricci; Stefano Giovagnoli; Luigina Romani; Claudio Costantini
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 6.  Tumour neoantigen mimicry by microbial species in cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Maximilian Boesch; Florent Baty; Sacha I Rothschild; Michael Tamm; Markus Joerger; Martin Früh; Martin H Brutsche
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.