| Literature DB >> 33126680 |
David Berard1,2, Chirantan Sen1,3, Corinne D Nawn1, August N Blackburn4, Kathy L Ryan1, Megan B Blackburn1.
Abstract
Endotracheal intubation is a common life-saving procedure implemented in emergency care to ensure patient oxygenation, but it is difficult and often performed in suboptimal conditions leading to high rates of patient complications. Undetected misplacement in the esophagus is a preventable complication that can lead to fatalities in 5-10% of patients who undergo emergency intubation. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring and other proper placement detection methods are useful, yet the problem of misplacement persists. Our previous work demonstrated the utility of spectral reflectance sensors for differentiating esophageal and tracheal tissues, which can be used to confirm proper endotracheal tube placement. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of spectral characterization in the presence of saline, blood, "vomit", and soot in the trachea. Our results show that spectral properties of the trachea that differentiate it from the esophagus persist in the presence of these substances. This work further confirms the potential usefulness of this novel detection technology in field applications.Entities:
Keywords: airway management; endotracheal tube misplacement; endotracheal tube placement; esophageal tissue; intubation; spectral reflectance; tissue detection; tracheal tissue
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33126680 PMCID: PMC7662513 DOI: 10.3390/s20216138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Block diagram of the experimental setup showing data acquisition module and light source connected to fiber optic probe. Cross-section of fiber with emitting and receiving fibers and tip showing mirror with 90° signal redirection included (adapted from previous publication [11]).
Figure 2Trachea sample with soot applied prior to spectral collection.
Figure 3Averaged reflectance spectra at baseline and in the presence of various body fluids for esophageal and tracheal tissues.
Figure 4(a) Boxplot of Ratio B and (b) Ratio Y for tracheal and esophageal tissues in the presence of body fluids and soot. Dots in the boxplots are outliers, defined as being 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond the first or third quartiles. * Represents statistical significance vs. esophagus.
Area under the receiver operator characteristic curves for differentiating trachea from esophagus using Ratio B and Ratio Y.
| Substance | Ratio | |
|---|---|---|
| B | Y | |
| Overall | 0.867 | 0.704 |
| Baseline | 0.891 | 0.871 |
| Saline | 0.947 | 0.878 |
| Blood | 0.763 | 0.364 |
| “Vomit” | 0.873 | 0.801 |
| Soot | 0.847 | 0.557 |
Figure 5Receiver operator characteristic curves including all Ratio B and Ratio Y measurements in this study with corresponding area under the curve (AUC) values. The AUC for Ratio B is statistically significantly greater than for Ratio Y. In this context, specificity and sensitivity are reported according to correct identification of trachea.