| Literature DB >> 33126527 |
Susana Moreira1, Luzia Gonçalves2,3.
Abstract
In Portugal, the majority of immigrants come from Portuguese-speaking countries. Among children, overweight and obesity are serious public health concerns, but a few studies include children with immigrant background. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of overweight and obesity and risk of abdominal obesity in school-age children and to explore potential determinants, considering the origin of the children's parents (both mother and father are non-Portuguese, only one Portuguese, and both are Portuguese). A cross-sectional study included a random sample of 789 children (5-11 years old, 49.2% of males and 50.8% female) attending public primary schools in Barreiro, district of Setubal, Portugal. Fieldwork occurred from 20th April to 3rd July 2009. Data concerning socioeconomic, eating habits, and sports outside school were obtained through a questionnaire applied to the children's person in charge. Anthropometric measures were collected by certified technicians. One-third of the children presented overweight and obesity (33.7%, 95% CI [30.0; 37.7]) and risk of abdominal obesity (16.4%, 95% CI [13.6; 19.7]) without differences according to parents' origin. Children with immigrant background presented higher consumption of low-priced, high-sugar, and high-fat foods, with a worse situation for girls. Females from both non-Portuguese parents also practiced less sports outside school than those where one or two parents are Portuguese. Thus, promoting and monitoring a healthy diet and physical activity in this group should be prioritized in this local setting.Entities:
Keywords: children of immigrants; overweight and obesity; parents’ origin; risk of abdominal obesity
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33126527 PMCID: PMC7663684 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Sampling and data collection of this cross-sectional study.
Country of birth of the children and their parents.
| Child | Father | Mother | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Portugal | 707 | 94.4 | 587 | 79.4 | 596 | 80.2 |
| Angola | 2 | 0.3 | 47 | 6.4 | 42 | 5,7 |
| Cape-Verde | 12 | 1.6 | 38 | 5.1 | 32 | 4.3 |
| Guinea-Bissau | 8 | 1.1 | 17 | 2.3 | 18 | 2.4 |
| Mozambique | 0 | 0.0 | 18 | 2.4 | 12 | 1.6 |
| Brazil | 10 | 1.3 | 13 | 1.8 | 14 | 1.9 |
| São Tomé | 2 | 0.3 | 4 | 0.5 | 4 | 0.5 |
| Other countries | 8 | 1.0 | 15 | 2.1 | 25 | 3.4 |
Sociodemographic characteristics of children and origins of their parents.
| Variables/Categories | Frequencies | |
|---|---|---|
|
| % | |
|
| ||
| Male | 388 | 49.2 |
| Female | 401 | 50.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 5 | 38 | 5.0 |
| 6 | 125 | 16.5 |
| 7 | 121 | 16.0 |
| 8 | 157 | 20.7 |
| 9 | 185 | 24.4 |
| 10 | 104 | 13.7 |
| 11 | 27 | 3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 0 | 179 | 24.3 |
| 1 | 380 | 51.5 |
| 2 | 106 | 14.8 |
| >=3 | 73 | 9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Both non-Portuguese | 92 | 12.5 |
| Only one Portuguese | 115 | 15.6 |
| Both Portuguese | 531 | 72.0 |
|
|
|
|
Nutritional status by subgroups.
| Nutritional Status | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Underweight | Normal Weight | Overweight and Obesity | Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.125 | ||||
| Male | 55 (12.2) | 157 (52.0) | 90 (29.8) | 302 | |
| Female | 48 (15.4) | 147 (47.1) | 117 (37.5) | 312 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.093 | ||||
| 5 | 5 (17.9) | 17 (60.7) | 6 (21.4) | 28 | |
| 6 | 17 (17.0) | 47 (47.0) | 36 (36.0) | 100 | |
| 7 | 11 (10.9) | 61 (60.4) | 29 (28.7) | 101 | |
| 8 | 34 (25.2) | 59 (43.7) | 42 (31.1) | 135 | |
| 9 | 17 (12.2) | 68 (48.9) | 54 (38.8) | 139 | |
| 10 | 11 (17.5) | 34 (54.0) | 18 (28.6) | 63 | |
| 11 | 3 (18.8) | 6 (37.5) | 7 (43.8) | 16 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.261 | ||||
| 0 | 16 (11.2) | 74 (51.7) | 53 (37.1) | 143 | |
| 1 | 55 (18.6) | 142 (48.1) | 98 (33.2) | 295 | |
| 2 | 14 (17.7) | 46 (58.2) | 19 (24.1) | 79 | |
| ≥3 | 10 (19.2) | 24 (46.2) | 18 (34.6) | 52 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.978 | ||||
| Both non-Portuguese | 11 (17.2) | 32 (50.0) | 21 (32.8) | 64 | |
| Only one Portuguese | 15 (16.7) | 47 (52.2) | 28 (31.1) | 90 | |
| Both Portuguese | 69 (16.7) | 201 (48.8) | 142 (34.5) | 412 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Figure 2Nutritional status, according to CDC definition, for children with immigration background or native, separated by sex.
Comparisons of variables (mean ± SD) between children with immigration background versus native parents, stratified by sex.
| Female | Male | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables (units) | Immigrant Background ( | Native ( |
| Immigrant Background ( | Native ( |
|
| Decimal age (years) | 8.61 ± 1.49 | 8.81 ± 1.34 | 0.303 | 8.80 ± 1.49 | 8.68 ± 1.46 | 0.550 |
| Weight (kg) | 31.90 ± 9.03 | 32.07 ± 9.15 | 0.893 | 32.20 ± 11.18 | 31.29 ± 9.56 | 0.501 |
| Height (cm) | 133.88 ± 11.02 | 133.35 ± 9.59 | 0.689 | 134.02 ± 10.68 | 132.97 ± 10.25 | 0.449 |
| Sitting Height (cm) | 70.38 ± 4.90 | 70.80 ± 4.54 | 0.491 | 70.79 ± 4.63 | 70.92 ± 4.68 | 0.841 |
| BMI (kg/cm2) | 17.55 ± 3.48 | 17.77 ± 3.51 | 0.632 | 17.53 ± 3.94 | 17.36 ± 3.32 | 0.708 |
| Body fat (%) | 20.30 ± 8.30 | 22.57 ± 9.51 | 0.063 | 18.59 ± 10.29 | 18.33 ± 8.81 | 0.834 |
|
| ||||||
| Tricipital | 12.99 ± 5.29 | 14.56 ± 6.22 |
| 11.88 ± 6.50 | 11.58 ± 5.72 | 0.701 |
| Thigh (mm) | 20.19 ± 8.22 | 22.61 ± 9.02 |
| 17.81 ± 8.89 | 18.14 ± 8.87 | 0.785 |
| Calf (mm) | 13.71 ± 6.01 | 15.10 ± 6.57 | 0.104 | 12.21 ± 7.13 | 12.14 ± 6.55 | 0.930 |
| Subscapular (mm) | 9.56 ± 5.77 | 10.55 ± 6.83 | 0.258 | 9.10 ± 6.82 | 8.32 ± 5.90 | 0.343 |
| Suprailliac (mm) | 9.95 ± 6.23 | 11.47 ± 7.27 | 0.101 | 9.37 ± 7.91 | 8.59 ± 7.18 | 0.429 |
|
| ||||||
| Relaxed arm | 20.64 ± 3.30 | 21.42 ± 3.66 | 0.100 | 20.44 ± 4.11 | 20.39 ± 3.93 | 0.925 |
| Tensed arm | 21.33 ± 3.19 | 21.98 ± 3.45 | 0.153 | 21.36 ± 3.89 | 21.24 ± 3.56 | 0.807 |
| Calf (cm) | 28.25 ± 3.75 | 28.74 ± 3.76 | 0.322 | 28.35 ± 4.05 | 28.15 ± 5.17 | 0.760 |
| Waist (cm) | 58.69 ± 7.20 | 60.41 ± 8.10 | 0.099 | 60.38 ± 9.19 | 60.37 ± 7.93 | 0.992 |
| Hip (cm) | 71.87 ± 9.21 | 72.55 ± 9.43 | 0.588 | 71.24 ± 10.72 | 70.36 ± 10.00 | 0.520 |
|
| ||||||
| Humerus (cm) | 5.17 ± 0.46 | 5.19 ± 0.47 | 0.854 | 5.36 ± 0.55 | 5.29 ± 0.50 | 0.355 |
| Femur (cm) | 7.75 ± 0.66 | 7.71 ± 0.64 | 0.710 | 8.1 6 ± 0.79 | 8.08 ± 0.69 | 0.415 |
|
| ||||||
| Waist-to-height ratio | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 0.45 ± 0.04 |
| 0.45 ± 0.05 | 0.45 ± 0.04 | 0.568 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 0.84 ± 0.07 | 0.062 | 0.85 ± 0.05 | >0.87 ± 0.14 | 0.311 |
| Arm muscle area | 218.46 ± 53.56 | 226.34 ± 57.42 | 0.293 | 224.03 ± 67.59 | 225.40 ± 72.38 | 0.885 |
| Arm fat area | 124.44 ± 66.94 | 144.32 ± 80.17 | 0.071 b | 117.15 ± 88.26 | 113.09 ± 76.06 | 0.704 |
a MWW test: median (P25–P75)—immigrant background: 12.50 (9.38–16.13) versus native: 13.00 (10.00–19.00); p = 0.073. b MWW test: median (P25–P75)—immigrant background: 111.85 (75.70–163.05) versus native: 122.80 (83.00–192.60); p = 0.071.
Practice sports, housekeeping tasks, and food consumption according to parents’ origin, for total sample and stratified by sex.
| Variables | Total and by Sex ( | Percentage of Affirmative Responses | χ2 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Both Non-Portuguese ( | Only One Portuguese ( | Both Portuguese ( | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Female (364) | 15.2 | 28.8 | 43.2 | 15.31 (0.001) | |
| Male (352) | 52.4 | 55.7 | 58.7 | 0.69 (0.707) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Female (323) | 89.5 | 74.1 | 73.6 | 4.53 (0.104) | |
| Male (280) | 84.6 | 61.9 | 68.3 | 5.48 (0.064) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Female (333) | 70.0 | 38.2 | 40.3 | 13.03 (0.010) | |
| Male (328) | 60.5 | 39.2 | 37.6 | 7.92 (0.019) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Female (336) | 64.1 | 31.1 | 33.9 | 18.68 (<0.001) | |
| Male (328) | 52.4 | 22.0 | 36.0 | 9.15 (0.001) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Female (334) | 42.1 | 23.6 | 19.9 | 9.12 (0.010) | |
| Male (325) | 34.2 | 20.4 | 24.4 | 2.32 (0.313) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Female (349) | 75.0 | 41.1 | 41.5 | 16.12 (<0.001) | |
| Male (331) | 61.0 | 38.0 | 45.4 | 5.01 (0.082) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Female (348) | 72.1 | 51.8 | 49.4 | 7.59 (0.022) | |
| Male (337) | 72.1 | 37.3 | 53.5 | 11.38 (0.003) | |
* every day or almost every day.
Figure 3Results of five models (M1–M5). Each dependent variable is within circles and explanatory variables (or their categories) are within rectangles. Values correspond to adjusted odds ratio (with 95% CI). Thick line arrows indicate very significant associations (p < 0.001), solid line arrows show significant associations (with 0.001 < p ≤ 0.05), and dashed lines denote no association (p > 0.05).