Binhua Zou1, Jiehuang Zheng1, Wende Deng1, Yanhui Tan1, Ligang Jie2, Yuan Qu2, Qin Yang1, Minhong Ke1, Zongbao Ding1, Yan Chen1, Qinghong Yu3, Xiaojuan Li4. 1. Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515,China. 2. Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, ZhuJiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China. 3. Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, ZhuJiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China. Electronic address: yuqinghong@smu.edu.cn. 4. Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Drug Screening, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515,China. Electronic address: lixiaoj@smu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a threat to aged people who have excessive osteoclast activation and bone resorption, subsequently causing fracture and even disability. Inhibiting osteoclast differentiation and absorptive functions has become an efficient approach to treat osteoporosis, but osteoclast-targeting inhibitors available clinically remain rare. Kirenol (Kir), a bioactive diterpenoid derived from an antirheumatic Chinese herbal medicine Herba Siegesbeckiae, can treat collagen-induced arthritis in vivo and promote osteoblast differentiation in vitro, while the effects of Kir on osteoclasts are still unclear. PURPOSE: We explore the role of Kir on RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in vitro and bone loss in vivo. METHODS: The in vitro effects of Kir on osteoclast differentiation, bone resorption and the underlying mechanisms were evaluated with bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs). In vivo experiments were performed using an ovariectomy (OVX)-induced osteoporosis model. RESULTS: We found that Kir remarkably inhibited osteoclast generation and bone resorption in vitro. Mechanistically, Kir significantly inhibited F-actinring formation and repressed RANKL-induced NF-κB p65 activation and p-p38, p-ERK and c-Fos expression. Moreover, Kir inhibited both the expression and nuclear translocation of NFATc1. Ca2+ oscillation and caveolin-1 (Cav-1) were also reduced by Kir during osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Consistent with these findings, 2-10 mg/kg Kir attenuated OVX-induced osteoporosis in vivo as evidenced by decreased osteoclast numbers and downregulated Cav-1 and NFATc1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Kir suppresses osteoclastogenesis and the Cav-1/NFATc1 signaling pathway both in vitro and in vivo and protects against OVX-induced osteoporosis. Our findings reveal Kir as a potential safe oral treatment for osteoporosis.
BACKGROUND:Osteoporosis is a threat to aged people who have excessive osteoclast activation and bone resorption, subsequently causing fracture and even disability. Inhibiting osteoclast differentiation and absorptive functions has become an efficient approach to treat osteoporosis, but osteoclast-targeting inhibitors available clinically remain rare. Kirenol (Kir), a bioactive diterpenoid derived from an antirheumatic Chinese herbal medicine Herba Siegesbeckiae, can treat collagen-induced arthritis in vivo and promote osteoblast differentiation in vitro, while the effects of Kir on osteoclasts are still unclear. PURPOSE: We explore the role of Kir on RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in vitro and bone loss in vivo. METHODS: The in vitro effects of Kir on osteoclast differentiation, bone resorption and the underlying mechanisms were evaluated with bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs). In vivo experiments were performed using an ovariectomy (OVX)-induced osteoporosis model. RESULTS: We found that Kir remarkably inhibited osteoclast generation and bone resorption in vitro. Mechanistically, Kir significantly inhibited F-actinring formation and repressed RANKL-induced NF-κB p65 activation and p-p38, p-ERK and c-Fos expression. Moreover, Kir inhibited both the expression and nuclear translocation of NFATc1. Ca2+ oscillation and caveolin-1 (Cav-1) were also reduced by Kir during osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Consistent with these findings, 2-10 mg/kg Kir attenuated OVX-induced osteoporosis in vivo as evidenced by decreased osteoclast numbers and downregulated Cav-1 and NFATc1 expression. CONCLUSIONS:Kir suppresses osteoclastogenesis and the Cav-1/NFATc1 signaling pathway both in vitro and in vivo and protects against OVX-induced osteoporosis. Our findings reveal Kir as a potential safe oral treatment for osteoporosis.