Literature DB >> 33125581

Efficacy, safety, and perioperative outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate-a comparison of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary retention.

Pawel Trotsenko1,2, Christian Wetterauer3, Philipp Grimsehl1, Tilmann Möltgen1, Susan Meierhans1, Lukas Manka4, Helge Seifert2, Stephen Wyler1, Maciej Kwiatkowski1,4.   

Abstract

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a valid treatment option to relieve bladder outlet obstruction in patients with large prostate volumes (PV). Its efficacy, tolerability, and safety are comparable to the ones of other laser treatments of the prostate and resection techniques. However, safety and efficacy of HoLEP have not been compared between patients with and without preoperative urinary retention. We included 350 patients (mean age 71.2 years) who had undergone HoLEP due to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urinary retention caused by prostatic hyperplasia. We evaluated the differences in peri- and postoperative outcomes and complications between patients with and patients without preoperative urinary retention. The mean PV was 115 cm3. PV was > 100 cm3 in 61.9% and < 100 cm3 in 38.1% of the patients. Perioperative complications occurred in 23 patients (6.6%), 15 of which (4.3%) required operative revision. We found no significant differences in terms of complication rates between patients with PV > 100 cm3 and patients with PV < 100 cm3. Mean catheterization-duration was 3.3 days. Preoperatively, 140 patients (40%) had a suprapubic or transurethral indwelling catheter; they did not differ from patients without preoperative catheter regarding postoperative catheter removal success rate, early postoperative complications, and functional outcomes. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 43 patients (12.3%). Median postoperative PSA-decline was 6.1 ug/l (89.8% drop). HoLEP is a safe and effective treatment for patients with LUTS or urinary retention and large PV. PV > 100 cm3 was not associated with higher complication rates or successful catheter-removal. Furthermore, functional outcomes were independent of preoperative catheterization.
© 2020. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  HoLEP; Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; LUTS; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Urinary retention

Year:  2020        PMID: 33125581     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-03170-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  25 in total

1.  Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sascha A Ahyai; Karin Lehrich; Rainer M Kuntz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Recent developments in the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  J V Jepsen; R C Bruskewitz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Comparison of Holmium Laser Prostate Enucleation Outcomes in Patients with or without Preoperative Urinary Retention.

Authors:  Niels V Johnsen; Trisha J Kammann; Tracy Marien; Ryan B Pickens; Nicole L Miller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Richard Naspro; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Salonia; Vincenzo Scattoni; Giorgio Guazzoni; Renzo Colombo; Andrea Cestari; Alberto Briganti; Bruno Mazzoccoli; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement.

Authors:  Sascha A Ahyai; Peter Gilling; Steven A Kaplan; Rainer M Kuntz; Stephan Madersbacher; Francesco Montorsi; Mark J Speakman; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Urologic diseases in America project: benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  John T Wei; Elizabeth Calhoun; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients.

Authors:  Rainer M Kuntz; Sascha Ahyai; Karin Lehrich; Amr Fayad
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients.

Authors:  Ioannis Varkarakis; Zacharias Kyriakakis; Athanasios Delis; Vasilios Protogerou; Charalambos Deliveliotis
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Rainer M Kuntz; Karin Lehrich; Sascha A Ahyai
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Francesco Montorsi; Richard Naspro; Andrea Salonia; Nazareno Suardi; Alberto Briganti; Matteo Zanoni; Sergio Valenti; Ivano Vavassori; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of En Bloc and Urethral Mucosal Flap Sparing Techniques Improve the Functional Outcomes in Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate: A Retrospective Case Control Study.

Authors:  Jizhi Zhou; Zengrong Hua; Min Tang; Xiaoxin Meng; Pu Li
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.