Literature DB >> 33125545

Short-term posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation without fusion to treat type II odontoid fracture among people under 60 years.

Jipeng Song1,2, Ping Yi2, Yanlei Wang2,3, Long Gong1,2, Yan Sun2,3, Feng Yang2, Xiangsheng Tang2, Mingsheng Tan4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation is a reliable technique used in treatment of type II odontoid fracture. However, the loss of cervical range of rotation motion (RORM) was inevitable. There were few studies focusing on the influence of short-term C1-C2 fixation with nonfusion technique to preserve cervical function in patients younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to compare cervical RORM which was measured by an improved goniometer, and the clinical outcomes between short-term and long-term C1-C2 fixation techniques in the treatment of Grauer type 2B and 2C odontoid fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study represents a retrospective analysis, including patients who underwent primary C1-C2 fixation surgery. These patients were divided into short-term and long-term groups based on whether underwent a fixation removal operation. The clinical results were collected and compared between the two groups. Independent T test and Chi-square analyses were used to identify significant differences between the two groups and dependent T test was used within each group. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.
RESULTS: There were no severe postoperative complications, and all 60 patients achieved spinal stabilization after primary surgery. The mean rotation angle in the short-term group at last follow-up time was 138.39 ± 21.06°, which was better than 83.59 ± 13.06° in the long-term group (p < .05). The same statistical difference was observed in flexion-extension angle, which was 71.11 ± 18.73° in short-term group and 53.34 ± 18.23° in long-term group. The mean NDI score in short-term group at last follow-up time was 1.23 ± 0.86 and better than 8.24 ± 3.17 in long-term group. However, the VAS score in short-term group was 1.82 ± 0.54 which was worse compared to 0.64 ± 0.29 in long-term group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that primary C1-C2 fixation with nonfusion technique could support satisfactory clinical effects. In addition, the removal of instruments after bony fusion could improve the function of cervical movement significantly in patients under 60 years.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical range of motion; Nonfusion technique; Patients under 60 years; Short-term C1–C2 screw fixation; Type II odontoid fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33125545     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03641-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  18 in total

1.  Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass.

Authors:  Mingsheng Tan; Huimin Wang; Yunting Wang; Guangbo Zhang; Ping Yi; Zirong Li; Hongyu Wei; Feng Yang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  C1 lateral mass screw placement via the posterior arch: a technique comparison and anatomic analysis.

Authors:  James M Lin; John A Hipp; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Biomechanical comparison of the pullout strengths of C1 lateral mass screws and C1 posterior arch screws.

Authors:  Christopher M Zarro; Steven C Ludwig; Adam H Hsieh; Charles N Seal; Daniel E Gelb
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  C1-C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation for Pediatric Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Initial Results and Long-term Follow-up.

Authors:  Zhi-Da Chen; Jin Wu; Cheng-Wu Lu; Wen-Rong Zeng; Zhuan-Zhi Huang; Bin Lin
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Placement of C1 Pedicle Screws Using Minimal Exposure: Radiographic, Clinical, and Literature Validation.

Authors:  Richard P Menger; Christopher M Storey; Menarvia K C Nixon; Justin Haydel; Anil Nanda; Anthony Sin
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-08-12

Review 6.  Surgical management of odontoid fractures.

Authors:  Germán Ochoa
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 7.  Avoiding pitfalls in anterior screw fixation for type II odontoid fractures.

Authors:  Marcus D Mazur; Michael L Mumert; Erica F Bisson; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Direct anterior screw fixation for recent and remote odontoid fractures.

Authors:  R I Apfelbaum; R R Lonser; R Veres; A Casey
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Posterior C1-C2 Temporary Fixation Without Fusion and C1-C2 Fusion for Fresh Odontoid Fractures.

Authors:  Qunfeng Guo; Yuan Deng; Jian Wang; Liang Wang; Xuhua Lu; Xiang Guo; Bin Ni
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Posterior temporary C1-2 fixation for 3-part fractures of the axis (odontoid dens and Hangman fractures).

Authors:  Suomao Yuan; Bin Wei; Yonghao Tian; Jun Yan; Wanlong Xu; Lianlei Wang; Xinyu Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  2 in total

1.  Outcomes of ultra-old vs old patients after hip fracture surgery: a matched cohort analysis of 1524 patients.

Authors:  Julia Poh Hwee Ng; Tong Leng Tan; Anand Pillai; Sean Wei Loong Ho
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Deep learning-based tool affects reproducibility of pes planus radiographic assessment.

Authors:  Jalim Koo; Sangchul Hwang; Seung Hwan Han; Junho Lee; Hye Sun Lee; Goeun Park; Hyeongmin Kim; Jiae Choi; Sungjun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.