Literature DB >> 3312537

Long-term results after secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts.

H Enemark1, S Sindet-Pedersen, M Bundgaard.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was longitudinally to evaluate the treatment results after secondary bone grafting in 224 cleft patients with an observation period of more than four years. The patients were divided into three groups according to age and eruption stage of the canine at the time of surgery. Group A included 94 patients with a mean age of 10 years, operated before eruption of the canine; group B included 72 patients with a mean age of 13.1 years operated after eruption of the canine; and group C included 58 patients operated after the age of 16 years (mean age, 20.4 years). The evaluation of the treatment results included longitudinal comparison of marginal bone level, periodontal status on cleft-related teeth, dental status in the bone grafted region, esthetical and functional properties of the reconstructed alveolar process, as well as the influence on growth of the maxilla. The marginal bone level was found to be significantly higher among unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) patients in the youngest groups as compared to the other groups. The number of UCLP and BCLP patients who could be treated without bridgework was significantly higher in the youngest age group than in the other groups, as were the esthetic and functional properties of the reconstructed alveolar process. External root resorption occurred in 17 patients in groups B and C. No influence of the procedure on sagittal growth of the maxilla could be demonstrated, whereas the anterior facial height was reduced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3312537     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90439-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  28 in total

Review 1.  Tissue engineering strategies for alveolar cleft reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nard G Janssen; Willem L J Weijs; Ronald Koole; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; Gert J Meijer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Radiographic evaluation of the transplant bone height in patients with clefts of the lip/alveolus/palate after secondary bone grafting.

Authors:  C Opitz; B Meier; C Stoll; D Subklew
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies-USP (HRAC-USP)--part 3: oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  José Alberto de Souza Freitas; Daniela Gamba Garib; Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam; Roberta Martinelli Carvalho; Thais Marchini Oliveira; Rita de Cássia Moura Carvalho Lauris; Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga de Almeida; Lucimara Teixeira das Neves; Renato Yassutaka Faria Yaedú; Simone Soares; Reinaldo Mazzottini; João Henrique Nogueira Pinto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Radiographic assessment of influence of cleft width and canine position on alveolar bone graft success: a retro-prospective study.

Authors:  Varsha H Upadya; H Hari Kishore Bhat; K Gopalkrishnan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-05-16

5.  Evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting outcomes performed after canine eruption in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Diego Coelho Lorenzoni; Guilherme Janson; Juliana Cunha Bastos; Roberta Martinelli Carvalho; José Carlos Bastos; Rita de Cássia Moura Carvalho Lauris; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Terumi Okada Ozawa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Alveolar Bone Grafting in Cleft Patients from Bone Defect to Dental Implants.

Authors:  Marko Vuletić; Predrag Knežević; Dražen Jokić; Jerko Rebić; Domagoj Žabarović; Darko Macan
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2014-12

7.  Evaluation of alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using a computer-aided diagnosis system.

Authors:  Pipop Sutthiprapaporn; Keiji Tanimoto; Takashi Nakamoto; Supaporn Kongsomboon; Saowaluck Limmonthol; Poonsak Pisek; Chutimaporn Keinprasit
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-12-23

8.  Secondary alveolar bone grafting: An outcome analysis.

Authors:  Ananth S Murthy; James A Lehman
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

9.  Evaluation of Secondary and Late Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on 66 Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.

Authors:  Ravi Mahajan; Harish Ghildiyal; Ankit Khasgiwala; Gogulnathan Muthukrishnan; Sukhdeep Kahlon
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 0.947

10.  Comparison of tooth development stage of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after secondary alveolar bone graft: Unilateral cleft lip and alveolus vs unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Heon-Mook Park; Dong-Hun Han; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.