Literature DB >> 33125304

Occupational exposure to graphene and silica nanoparticles. Part I: workplace measurements and samplings.

Fabio Boccuni1, Riccardo Ferrante1, Francesca Tombolini1, Claudio Natale1, Andrea Gordiani1, Stefania Sabella2, Sergio Iavicoli1.   

Abstract

Few-Layers Graphene (FLG) are able to improve the performance of materials, due to their chemical-physical properties. Engineered amorphous silica nanoparticles (SiO2NPs) are among the most widespread nanomaterials (NMs) in the world. Such nanomaterials are two case studies of the research project 'NanoKey' that integrated the exposure assessment through personal measurements and sampling in the workplace, as described in the present work (part I), with the biomonitoring of exposed workers (reported in part II). Measurement campaigns were conducted according to OECD and WHO harmonized approach in two production sites. The set of instruments included real-time devices for high-resolution measurements at the nanoscale and time-integrated samplers for the off-line gravimetric analysis and chemical and morphological (SEM-EDS) characterization of exposure in order to identify the contribution of production compared to the background. Values of particle number concentration (PNC) and lung deposited surface area (LDSA) within the FLG production resulted higher than the background far field (FF), even if they are always similar to the near field (NF) ones: the average diameter (Davg) during the production was higher than the NF background but always lower than the FF values. SEM-EDS analysis highlighted the presence of structures comparable to those produced. During the SiO2NPs production, the PBZ values showed PNC and LDSA levels higher than the background, with a decrease in the Davg probably due to NPs emission. SEM-EDS confirms the presence of rare silica nanoparticles. Since the exposure to airborne NMs cannot be excluded in both production sites, a prevention-through-design approach to mitigate the potential risk for workers has been recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nanotechnology; nanomaterials; prevention-through-design; risk assessment; workers

Year:  2020        PMID: 33125304     DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2020.1834634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotoxicology        ISSN: 1743-5390            Impact factor:   5.913


  4 in total

1.  Epigenetic Mechanisms in Understanding Nanomaterial-Induced Toxicity.

Authors:  Manosij Ghosh; Lode Godderis; Peter Hoet
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Nanosafety Analysis of Graphene-Based Polyester Resin Composites on a Life Cycle Perspective.

Authors:  Francisco Aznar Mollá; Jose Antonio Heredia Alvaro; Oscar Andreu Sánchez; Carlos Fito-López; Inmaculada Colmenar González
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Evaluation of the protective roles of alpha-lipoic acid supplementation on nanomaterial-induced toxicity: A meta-analysis of in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Xiaogang Luo; Dongli Xie; Tong Wu; Wei Xu; Qingyang Meng; Kangli Cao; Jianchen Hu
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-06

4.  Lung recovery from DNA damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile.

Authors:  Luis Augusto Visani de Luna; Thomas Loret; Alexander Fordham; Atta Arshad; Matthew Drummond; Abbie Dodd; Neus Lozano; Kostas Kostarelos; Cyrill Bussy
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 9.112

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.