Literature DB >> 33124464

For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature.

Rafael Dal-Ré1, Carmen Ayuso2,3.   

Abstract

We aimed to quantify the number of pre- and post-retraction citations obtained by genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct. All retraction notices available in the Retraction Watch database for genetics articles published in 1970-2016 were assessed. The reasons for retraction were fabrication/falsification and plagiarism. The endpoints were the number of citations of retracted articles and when and how journals reported on retractions and whether this was published on PubMed.Four hundred and sixty retracted genetics articles were cited 34,487 times; 7,945 (23%) were post-retraction citations. Median time to retraction and time to last citation were 3.2 and 3 years, respectively. Most (96%) had a PubMed retraction notice, One percent of these were totally removed from journal websites altogether, and 4% had no information available on either the online or PDF versions. Ninety percent of citations were from articles retracted due to falsification/fabrication. The percentage of post-retraction citations was significantly higher in the case of plagiarism (42%) than in the case of fabrication/falsification (21.5%) (p<0.001). Median time to retraction was shorter (1.3 years) in the case of plagiarism than for fabrication/falsification (4.8 years, p<0.001). The retraction was more frequently reported in the PDFs (70%) for the fabrication/falsification cases than for the plagiarism cases (43%, p<0.001). The highest rate of retracted papers due to falsification/fabrication was among authors in the USA, and the highest rate for plagiarism was in China.Although most retractions were appropriately handled by journals, the gravest issue was that median time to retraction for articles retracted for falsification/fabrication was nearly 5 years, earning close to 6800 post-retraction citations. Journals should implement processes to speed-up the retraction process that will help to minimize post-retraction citations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Research misconduct; Retraction Watch database; citations; genetics; retraction notices

Year:  2020        PMID: 33124464     DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1835479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  3 in total

1.  A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  J Gen Philos Sci       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines.

Authors:  Elena Pastor-Ramón; Ivan Herrera-Peco; Oskia Agirre; María García-Puente; José María Morán
Journal:  Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine.

Authors:  Tzu-Kun Hsiao; Jodi Schneider
Journal:  Quant Sci Stud       Date:  2022-02-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.