Literature DB >> 33123938

Automated analysis and detection of abnormalities in transaxial anatomical cardiovascular magnetic resonance images: a proof of concept study with potential to optimize image acquisition.

James P Howard1, Sameer Zaman2, Aaraby Ragavan2, Kerry Hall2, Greg Leonard2, Sharon Sutanto2, Vijay Ramadoss2, Yousuf Razvi2, Nick F Linton2, Anil Bharath2, Matthew Shun-Shin2, Daniel Rueckert2, Darrel Francis2, Graham Cole2.   

Abstract

The large number of available MRI sequences means patients cannot realistically undergo them all, so the range of sequences to be acquired during a scan are protocolled based on clinical details. Adapting this to unexpected findings identified early on in the scan requires experience and vigilance. We investigated whether deep learning of the images acquired in the first few minutes of a scan could provide an automated early alert of abnormal features. Anatomy sequences from 375 CMR scans were used as a training set. From these, we annotated 1500 individual slices and used these to train a convolutional neural network to perform automatic segmentation of the cardiac chambers, great vessels and any pleural effusions. 200 scans were used as a testing set. The system then assembled a 3D model of the thorax from which it made clinical measurements to identify important abnormalities. The system was successful in segmenting the anatomy slices (Dice 0.910) and identified multiple features which may guide further image acquisition. Diagnostic accuracy was 90.5% and 85.5% for left and right ventricular dilatation, 85% for left ventricular hypertrophy and 94.4% for ascending aorta dilatation. The area under ROC curve for diagnosing pleural effusions was 0.91. We present proof-of-concept that a neural network can segment and derive accurate clinical measurements from a 3D model of the thorax made from transaxial anatomy images acquired in the first few minutes of a scan. This early information could lead to dynamic adaptive scanning protocols, and by focusing scanner time appropriately and prioritizing cases for supervision and early reporting, improve patient experience and efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Machine learning; Neural networks

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33123938      PMCID: PMC7969571          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-02050-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  8 in total

1.  A Multicenter, Scan-Rescan, Human and Machine Learning CMR Study to Test Generalizability and Precision in Imaging Biomarker Analysis.

Authors:  Anish Bhuva; Wenjia Bai; Clement Lau; Rhodri Davies; Yang Ye; Heeraj Bulluck; Elisa McAlindon; Veronica Culotta; Peter Swoboda; Gabriella Captur; Thomas Treibel; Joao Augusto; Kristopher Knott; Andreas Seraphim; Graham Cole; Steffen Petersen; Nicola Edwards; John Greenwood; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Alun Hughes; Daniel Rueckert; James Moon; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Reference ranges for cardiac structure and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in Caucasians from the UK Biobank population cohort.

Authors:  Steffen E Petersen; Nay Aung; Mihir M Sanghvi; Filip Zemrak; Kenneth Fung; Jose Miguel Paiva; Jane M Francis; Mohammed Y Khanji; Elena Lukaschuk; Aaron M Lee; Valentina Carapella; Young Jin Kim; Paul Leeson; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks.

Authors:  Wenjia Bai; Matthew Sinclair; Giacomo Tarroni; Ozan Oktay; Martin Rajchl; Ghislain Vaillant; Aaron M Lee; Nay Aung; Elena Lukaschuk; Mihir M Sanghvi; Filip Zemrak; Kenneth Fung; Jose Miguel Paiva; Valentina Carapella; Young Jin Kim; Hideaki Suzuki; Bernhard Kainz; Paul M Matthews; Steffen E Petersen; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer; Ben Glocker; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Cardiac Rhythm Device Identification Using Neural Networks.

Authors:  James P Howard; Louis Fisher; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Daniel Keene; Ahran D Arnold; Yousif Ahmad; Christopher M Cook; James C Moon; Charlotte H Manisty; Zach I Whinnett; Graham D Cole; Daniel Rueckert; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 5.  The reproducibility crisis in the age of digital medicine.

Authors:  Aaron Stupple; David Singerman; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-01-29

6.  Fully Automated, Quality-Controlled Cardiac Analysis From CMR: Validation and Large-Scale Application to Characterize Cardiac Function.

Authors:  Bram Ruijsink; Esther Puyol-Antón; Ilkay Oksuz; Matthew Sinclair; Wenjia Bai; Julia A Schnabel; Reza Razavi; Andrew P King
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-17

7.  Noncontrast T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis.

Authors:  Theodoros D Karamitsos; Stefan K Piechnik; Sanjay M Banypersad; Marianna Fontana; Ntobeko B Ntusi; Vanessa M Ferreira; Carol J Whelan; Saul G Myerson; Matthew D Robson; Philip N Hawkins; Stefan Neubauer; James C Moon
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03-14

Review 8.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer; Jörg Barkhausen; Scott D Flamm; Raymond J Kim; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.364

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Automatic Diagnosis Labeling of Cardiovascular MRI by Using Semisupervised Natural Language Processing of Text Reports.

Authors:  Sameer Zaman; Camille Petri; Kavitha Vimalesvaran; James Howard; Anil Bharath; Darrel Francis; Nicholas Peters; Graham D Cole; Nick Linton
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-11-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.