Literature DB >> 33123820

Sequential reversal learning: a new touchscreen schedule for assessing cognitive flexibility in mice.

Anna U Odland1, Rune Sandahl1, Jesper T Andreasen2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The widespread deficits in cognitive flexibility observed across psychiatric disorders call for improved rodent tests to understand the biology of cognitive flexibility and development of better psychotherapeutics. Current reversal learning paradigms have a forced-choice setup that challenges the interpretation of results.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed at developing a free-choice reversal learning test, where images are presented sequentially and animals are free to move, to enable investigation of the cognitive sub-processes that occur during reversal.
METHODS: Behavior in female C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice was characterized using chronic fluoxetine as a reference compound. Additional tests were included to support the interpretation of results and exclude confounding pharmacological effects. Behaviors in vehicle-treated mice were furthermore analyzed for relatedness to deepen the understanding of parameters measured.
RESULTS: We found that exploitation of the previously rewarded image was independent of exploration and acquisition of the new reward contingency and could be differentially modulated by fluoxetine, supporting recent theories that these processes are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, fluoxetine reduced mistake rate, premature and perseverative responses, and promoted conservative strategies during reversal without affecting hit rate. These effects appeared to be most prominent during the late stage of reversal learning, where accuracy was above chance level. Analysis of behaviors in vehicle-treated mice suggested that exploitation was related to an impulsive-like deficit in response inhibition, while exploration was more related to motivation.
CONCLUSIONS: This new schedule was feasible, easy to implement, and can provide a deeper understanding of the cognitive sub-processes during reversal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive flexibility; Exploitation; Exploration; Extinction; Go/no-go; Mouse behavior; Reversal learning; Sequential; Serotonin; Touchscreen

Year:  2020        PMID: 33123820     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-020-05687-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  47 in total

1.  The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, escitalopram, enhances inhibition of prepotent responding and spatial reversal learning.

Authors:  Holden D Brown; Dionisio A Amodeo; John A Sweeney; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 2.  Mechanisms of motivation-cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Todd S Braver; Marie K Krug; Kimberly S Chiew; Wouter Kool; J Andrew Westbrook; Nathan J Clement; R Alison Adcock; Deanna M Barch; Matthew M Botvinick; Charles S Carver; Roshan Cools; Ruud Custers; Anthony Dickinson; Carol S Dweck; Ayelet Fishbach; Peter M Gollwitzer; Thomas M Hess; Derek M Isaacowitz; Mara Mather; Kou Murayama; Luiz Pessoa; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Leah H Somerville
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Reversal learning and attentional set-shifting in mice.

Authors:  Gregory B Bissonette; Elizabeth M Powell
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 4.  Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action.

Authors:  Bernard W Balleine; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Predictably irrational: assaying cognitive inflexibility in mouse models of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jonathan L Brigman; Carolyn Graybeal; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Effects of chronic fluoxetine treatment on anxious behaviour of BALB/c mice in a 3-dimensional maze.

Authors:  R M Abuhamdah; M D Hussain; P L Chazot; A Ennaceur
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.493

7.  Orbitofrontal inactivation impairs reversal of Pavlovian learning by interfering with 'disinhibition' of responding for previously unrewarded cues.

Authors:  Kathryn A Burke; Yuji K Takahashi; Jessica Correll; P Leon Brown; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Serotonin modulates sensitivity to reward and negative feedback in a probabilistic reversal learning task in rats.

Authors:  Andrea Bari; David E Theobald; Daniele Caprioli; Adam C Mar; Alex Aidoo-Micah; Jeffrey W Dalley; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Dissociable effects of monoamine reuptake inhibitors on distinct forms of impulsive behavior in rats.

Authors:  Petra J J Baarendse; Louk J M J Vanderschuren
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  The role of 5-HT2C receptors in touchscreen visual reversal learning in the rat: a cross-site study.

Authors:  J Alsiö; S R O Nilsson; F Gastambide; R A H Wang; S A Dam; A C Mar; M Tricklebank; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cognitive flexibility in the wild: Individual differences in reversal learning are explained primarily by proactive interference, not by sampling strategies, in two passerine bird species.

Authors:  Julie Morand-Ferron; Michael S Reichert; John L Quinn
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  A Role for Serotonin in Modulating Opposing Drive and Brake Circuits of Impulsivity.

Authors:  Stephanie S Desrochers; Mitchell G Spring; Katherine M Nautiyal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.558

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.