Literature DB >> 33123808

Vaginal delivery in SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant women in Israel: a multicenter prospective analysis.

Amihai Rottenstreich1, Abraham Tsur2, Nava Braverman1, Doron Kabiri1, Shay Porat1, Shmuel Benenson3, Yonatan Oster3, Hadas Allouche Kam1, Asnat Walfisch1, Yossi Bart2, Raanan Meyer2, Shirlee Jaffe Lifshitz4, Uri Amikam5, Tal Biron-Shental6, Gal Cohen6, Yael Sciaky-Tamir7, Inbar Ben Shachar7, Yoav Yinon8, Benjamin Reubinoff9.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Among SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers, vaginal delivery rates were high and associated with favorable outcomes with no cases of neonatal COVID-19.
PURPOSE: To investigate the mode of delivery and its impact on immediate neonatal outcome in SARS-CoV-2-infected women.
METHODS: A prospective study following pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 who delivered between March 15th and July 4th in seven university affiliated hospitals in Israel.
RESULTS: A total of 52 women with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 delivered in the participating centers during the study period. The median gestational age at the time of delivery was 38 weeks, with 16 (30.8%) cases complicated by spontaneous preterm birth. Forty-three women (82.7%) underwent a trial of labor. The remaining 9 women underwent pre-labor cesarean delivery mostly due to obstetric indications, whereas one woman with a critical COVID-19 course underwent urgent cesarean delivery due to maternal deterioration. Among those who underwent a trial of labor (n = 43), 39 (90.7%) delivered vaginally, whereas 4 (9.3%) cases resulted in cesarean delivery. Neonatal RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swabs tested negative in all cases, and none of the infants developed pneumonia. No maternal and neonatal deaths were encountered.
CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study among SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers, vaginal delivery rates were high and associated with favorable outcomes with no cases of neonatal COVID-19. Our findings underscore that delivery management among SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers should be based on obstetric indications and may potentially reduce the high rates of cesarean delivery previously reported in this setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Delivery; Outcomes; Pregnancy; Vaginal

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33123808      PMCID: PMC7594971          DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05854-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) named the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) disease Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) and has declared that COVID-19 is a pandemic [1]. The perinatal outcomes of pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 are currently not well established. While some reports provided reassuring data [2, 3], others have shown various adverse neonatal outcomes including preterm delivery, respiratory morbidity, thrombocytopenia, liver injury and even death, raising a concern in this regard [4]. Moreover, the possibility of vertical transmission is still under a major debate [4-8]. Vertical transmission could potentially occur during a trial of vaginal delivery, through neonatal contact with vaginal and rectal fluids or blood, as is already well known for other pathogens (e.g., group B streptococcus, human papilloma virus, human immunodeficiency virus) [9, 10]. Current professional society guidelines recommend that the mode of delivery among women-tested positive for COVID-19 should be based upon obstetric indications [11, 12]. However, the rate of cesarean delivery in reported cases was relatively high [13, 14], reflecting the uncertainty in this regard. Given the inconclusive evidence in current literature and the high clinical relevance, we aimed to investigate the mode of delivery and its impact on immediate neonatal outcome in SARS-CoV-2-infected women in Israel.

Materials and methods

Patients

A prospective study following pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 who delivered between March 15th and July 4th in seven university affiliated hospitals in Israel, located throughout the country, and serving heterogeneous, multicultural, and multinational population from both heavily populated urban and rural areas. Inclusion criteria included pregnant women with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 prior to or within 48 h after delivery. Those diagnosed at the puerperium beyond this time period or those with a previous confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis that has resolved (as confirmed by RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swabs) prior to delivery were excluded. All women were treated according to the national guidelines for COVID-19 in pregnancy, and treatment was individualized based upon signs, symptoms, and laboratory and imaging findings. Timing and mode of delivery in all participating hospitals were determined primarily on the basis of obstetric indications. Women with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 prior to delivery, and those with suggestive symptoms of the disease or recent close contact with individuals with a confirmed diagnosis, were delivered in a negative-pressure isolation room, with strict infection protection measures for all attending staff throughout the course of delivery. Neonates of mothers with known or suspected COVID-19 were isolated until maternal COVID-19 diagnosis was ruled out, or if maternal infection was confirmed until neonatal RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swabs returned negative (twice, at 24 and 48 h after delivery). Direct breastfeeding in those with known or suspected COVID-19 was discouraged, while expressing milk under sterile conditions was allowed.

Data collection

For the purpose of this study, we abstracted maternal hospital admission records, delivery charts, surgical reports, and discharge letters from the electronic medical record databases of all participating centers. Data regarding maternal and pregnancy characteristics, as well as delivery and neonatal outcomes, were extracted. Data were captured using REDCap database. Symptoms were assessed according to patients' self-reported questionnaire. Disease severity was classified as mild, severe, or critical according to Wu and McGoogan's Classification [15].

Statistical analysis

Data are described as proportions for categorical variables and as medians and interquartile ranges for continuous variables without a normal distribution. The data were analyzed using Software Package for Statistics and Simulation (IBM SPSS version 24, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).

Results

A total of 52 women with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 delivered in the participating centers during the study period. The median maternal age was 28 [IQR 24–35] years; 9 (17.3%) were nulliparous. All women had a singleton gestation. Diagnosis of COVID-19 was made prior to hospital admission in 21 (40.4%) cases, in the delivery ward in 25 (48.1%) cases, and in 6 (11.5%) cases the diagnosis was made within 48 h following delivery during the stay at the maternity ward. COVID-19 testing was performed in 21 (40.4%) cases due to the presence of symptoms, while in the remaining parturients, it was made either as part of routine testing of all parturients (n = 18) or due to presumed exposure to known confirmed cases of COVID-19 (n = 13) (Table 1). Most cases were classified as mild (n = 26, 50.0%), none as severe, and one woman had a critical respiratory illness. The remaining 25 (48.1%) women remained asymptomatic throughout their disease course,
Table 1

Baseline and laboratory characteristics of parturients diagnosed with COVID-19

Characteristicsn = 52
Age (years)28 [24–35] (30)
  > 35 years16 (30.8%)
Parity2 [1–6] (3)
Nulliparous9 (17.3%)
Reasons for SARS-CoV-2 testing
 Reported symptoms21 (40.4%)
 Routine screening18 (34.7%)
 Presumed exposure to affected individuals13 (25.0%)
Symptomatic27 (51.9%)
 Fever11 (21.2%)
 Cough14 (26.9%)
 Dyspnea6 (11.5%)
 Sore throat4 (7.7%)
 Gastrointestinal symptoms4 (7.7%)
 Loss of taste/smell5 (9.6%)
Platelet count (X 109/L)191 [156–240] (197)
White blood cell count (X 109/L)9.8 [8.0–11.8] (10.4)
Hemoglobin (g/dL)12.5 [11.9–13.3] (12.4)
Abnormal liver enzymes*6 (11.5%)
C-reactive protein (mg/L)17.1 [3.0–29.5] (31.3)

All continuous variables are expressed as medians [interquartile range] (means)

*Aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase higher than two-fold the upper limit of normal range (> 35 IU/L)

†Normal range for C-reactive protein < 5 mg/L

Baseline and laboratory characteristics of parturients diagnosed with COVID-19 All continuous variables are expressed as medians [interquartile range] (means) *Aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase higher than two-fold the upper limit of normal range (> 35 IU/L) †Normal range for C-reactive protein < 5 mg/L The median gestational age at the time of delivery was 38 weeks, with 17 (32.7%) cases complicated by preterm birth, mostly (16/17) following spontaneous onset of labor; of them, 6 occurred at less than 34 weeks of gestation. The rate of gestational hypertensive disorders was 13.4% (7/52). The rate of comorbidities was 9.6% (5/52) including hypothyroidism (n = 2), and rheumatic arthritis, rheumatic heart disease, and protein S deficiency in one case each. Forty-three women (82.7%) underwent a trial of labor. The remaining 9 women underwent pre-labor cesarean delivery mostly due to obstetric indications (previous cesarean deliveries, n = 5; malpresentation, n = 3), whereas one woman with a critical COVID-19 course underwent urgent cesarean delivery due to maternal deterioration. Among those who underwent a trial of labor (n = 43), 39 (90.7%) delivered vaginally, whereas 4 (9.3%) cases resulted in cesarean delivery (fetal distress, n = 3; arrest of the second stage of labor, n = 1) (Table 2).
Table 2

Pregnancy and delivery characteristics and outcomes among parturients diagnosed with COVID-19

Characteristicsn = 52
Gestational age at delivery38 [36–40] (38)
  < 37 weeks17 (32.7%)
  < 34 weeks9 (17.3%)
Gestation diabetes mellitus6 (11.5%)
Gestational hypertensive disorders7 (13.4%)
Maternal complications
 Need for mechanical intubation1 (1.9%)
 Intensive-care unit admission1 (1.9%)
 Venous thromboembolism1 (1.9%)
 HELLP syndrome1 (1.9%)
Spontaneous onset of labor33 (63.5%)
Mode of anesthesia
 None15 (28.8%)
 General2 (3.8%)
 Regional35 (67.3%)
Mode of delivery
 Vaginal39 (75.0%)
 Pre-labor cesarean9 (17.3%)
 In-labor cesarean4 (7.7%)
Oxytocin use*18 (41.9%)
Intrapartum fever*3 (7.0%)
First-stage duration of labor (minutes)112 [51–221] (163)
Second-stage duration of labor (minutes)12 [7–40] (32)
Postpartum hemorrhage6 (11.5%)
Length of hospitalization (days)4 [3–7] (6)
Neonatal outcomes
 Birthweight (grams)3280 [2927–3606] (3140)
 5-min Apgar score < 81 (1.9%)
 NICU admission6 (11.5%)
 RDS6 (11.5%)
 TTN1 (1.9%)
 Hypoglycemia4 (9.3%)
 Hyperbilirubinemia5 (9.6%)

All continuous variables are expressed as medians [interquartile range] (means)

HELLP hemolysis elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets, RDS respiratory distress syndrome, TTN transient tachypnea of the newborn

*The denominator is the total number of women undergoing a trial of vaginal delivery (n = 43)

Pregnancy and delivery characteristics and outcomes among parturients diagnosed with COVID-19 All continuous variables are expressed as medians [interquartile range] (means) HELLP hemolysis elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets, RDS respiratory distress syndrome, TTN transient tachypnea of the newborn *The denominator is the total number of women undergoing a trial of vaginal delivery (n = 43) Median neonatal birthweight was 3280 [IQR 2927–3606] grams. One very-preterm newborn had a 5-min Apgar score of 7; all other neonates had 5-min Apgar scores higher than 7. No congenital abnormalities were encountered, except for one neonate with single umbilical artery. Neonatal RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swabs tested negative in all cases, and none of the infants developed pneumonia. No maternal and neonatal deaths were encountered. Six (11.5%) preterm neonates were complicated by respiratory distress syndrome and were hospitalized in neonatal intensive-care units. Neonatal complications including sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, asphyxia, and necrotizing enterocolitis were not observed (Table 2).

Discussion

In this study, we examined the obstetric outcomes of 52 parturients affected by COVID-19. Vaginal delivery rate was high, and all neonates were tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The current guidelines of various professional Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies recommend that the mode of delivery among SARS-CoV-2-infected parturients should be determined on the basis of obstetric indications [11, 12]. However, previous studies on COVID-19 in pregnancy reported remarkably high rates of cesarean delivery [13, 14, 16]. This may be related, at least in part, to concerns regarding the possibility of vertical transmission. Emerging evidence, while limited, suggests that vertical transmission is possible [5-8]. In the current study, we report a relatively high rate of vaginal delivery with no cases of neonatal COVID-19. Therefore, our findings support the aforementioned recommendations and provide further evidence regarding the safety of vaginal delivery in this setting. The rate of preterm birth in the current cohort was substantial, with one third of women delivering prematurely. The majority of preterm births in our study were spontaneous and not due to iatrogenic reasons. This concurs with prior studies, demonstrating a higher trend of preterm births among pregnant women with COVID-19 [13]. We also observed a relatively high rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (13.4%). It is possible that placental-mediated insult due to COVID-19 related coagulopathy may have a role in this finding [17, 18]. Further studies are warranted to investigate the mechanisms underlying these adverse outcomes. As universal testing for COVID-19 was not implemented in all participating centers, it is possible that additional asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected women who have given during the study period were not captured. In addition, we cannot exclude the possibility that the relatively low rate of comorbidities in the current cohort could have contributed to the mild course of disease in most women. It is plausible that a higher rate of cesarean delivery would have been encountered in populations with more prevalent comorbid conditions and different disease course severities. Finally, serologic testing was not carried among neonates. The strengths of the current study include its prospective design and the meticulous data collection. In conclusion, in this study, among SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers, vaginal delivery rates were high and associated with favorable outcomes with no cases of neonatal COVID-19. Our findings underscore and support current recommendations to manage deliveries among SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers on the basis of obstetric indications. Future studies are warranted to confirm our findings and better delineate the role of vertical transmission in the setting of maternal COVID-19.
  15 in total

1.  Possible Vertical Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 From an Infected Mother to Her Newborn.

Authors:  Lan Dong; Jinhua Tian; Songming He; Chuchao Zhu; Jian Wang; Chen Liu; Jing Yang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Early-onset neonatal sepsis.

Authors:  Kari A Simonsen; Ann L Anderson-Berry; Shirley F Delair; H Dele Davies
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Effect of mode of delivery on vertical human papillomavirus transmission - A meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Chatzistamatiou; A Sotiriadis; T Agorastos
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  COVID-19 in pregnancy: Risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Aman Mehan; Ashwin Venkatesh; Milind Girish
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.327

5.  Placental Pathology in COVID-19.

Authors:  Elisheva D Shanes; Leena B Mithal; Sebastian Otero; Hooman A Azad; Emily S Miller; Jeffery A Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Pregnancy and postpartum outcomes in a universally tested population for SARS-CoV-2 in New York City: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  M Prabhu; K Cagino; K C Matthews; R L Friedlander; S M Glynn; J M Kubiak; Y J Yang; Z Zhao; R N Baergen; J I DiPace; A S Razavi; D W Skupski; J R Snyder; H K Singh; R B Kalish; C M Oxford; L E Riley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 7.331

7.  Clinical features and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective, single-centre, descriptive study.

Authors:  Nan Yu; Wei Li; Qingling Kang; Zhi Xiong; Shaoshuai Wang; Xingguang Lin; Yanyan Liu; Juan Xiao; Haiyi Liu; Dongrui Deng; Suhua Chen; Wanjiang Zeng; Ling Feng; Jianli Wu
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in placental and fetal membrane samples.

Authors:  Christina A Penfield; Sara G Brubaker; Meghana A Limaye; Jennifer Lighter; Adam J Ratner; Kristen M Thomas; Jessica A Meyer; Ashley S Roman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2020-05-08

9.  Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Zunyou Wu; Jennifer M McGoogan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK: national population based cohort study.

Authors:  Marian Knight; Kathryn Bunch; Nicola Vousden; Edward Morris; Nigel Simpson; Chris Gale; Patrick O'Brien; Maria Quigley; Peter Brocklehurst; Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-06-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  A Ranking of the Most Common Maternal COVID-19 Symptoms: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Melissa Chao; Carlo Menon; Mohamed Elgendi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Comparison of clinical features and perinatal outcomes between pre-variant and post-variant periods in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2: analysis of 1935 cases.

Authors:  Dilek Sahin; Atakan Tanacan; Ali Taner Anuk; Selcan Sinaci; Berhan Besimoglu; Deniz Oluklu; Derya Uyan Hendem; Dilek Menekse Beser; Muradiye Yildirim; Bedri Sakcak; Seyit Ahmet Erol; Yeliz Colakoglu; Sule Goncu Ayhan; Ezgi Turgut; Serpil Unlu; Fuat Emre Canpolat; Seval Izdes; Sema Turan; Aziz Ahmet Surel; Ozlem Moraloglu Tekin
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  SARS-CoV-2 Infection and C-Section: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Eva Morán Antolín; José Román Broullón Molanes; María Luisa de la Cruz Conty; María Begoña Encinas Pardilla; María Del Pilar Guadix Martín; José Antonio Sainz Bueno; Laura Forcén Acebal; Pilar Pintado Recarte; Ana Álvarez Bartolomé; Juan Pedro Martínez Cendán; Óscar Martínez-Pérez
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 4.  Prognosis of COVID-19 in the middle eastern population, knowns and unknowns.

Authors:  Iman Dandachi; Waleed Aljabr
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 5.  SARS-CoV-2-Morphology, Transmission and Diagnosis during Pandemic, Review with Element of Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katarzyna Grudlewska-Buda; Natalia Wiktorczyk-Kapischke; Ewa Wałecka-Zacharska; Joanna Kwiecińska-Piróg; Katarzyna Buszko; Kamil Leis; Klaudia Juszczuk; Eugenia Gospodarek-Komkowska; Krzysztof Skowron
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.