| Literature DB >> 33123582 |
Karen Zulema Meza Valle1, Rosa A Saucedo Acuña1,2, Judith V Ríos Arana1, Naun Lobo1, Carlos Rodriguez3, Juan Carlos Cuevas-Gonzalez1, Karla Lizette Tovar-Carrillo1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In our days, several approaches reported the use of natural compounds in medical applications. Among them, pectin and allantoin are nontoxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable; however, its use for possible wound healing therapeutics is still limited. Pectin and allantoin have been applied in pharmaceutical industry and beauty cosmetic and could be also applied as scaffolds for tissue regeneration, wound healing, and so on. The aim of this study was to combine by the first time two natural ingredients to develop a new biomaterial to treat skin injuries in a rat model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33123582 PMCID: PMC7586176 DOI: 10.1155/2020/6897497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1(a) Pectin hydrogel enriched with allantoin without glycerol: red arrows indicate film fractures in both sides. (b) Pectin hydrogel enriched with allantoin plasticized with glycerol. Pectin hydrogel enriched with allantoin: (c) white side rich in allantoin and brown side rich in pectin and (d) more flexibility of the film due to glycerol.
Figure 2Swelling (%) as a function of time for pectin hydrogels with 90 wt% and 100 wt% allantoin concentrations in relation to pectin concentration. Result represents the mean (±s.e.m.) number of samples tested at 25°C to obtain a reliable value. Mean ± s.e.m. for n = 5 for each test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3FTIR for pectin hydrogels with 90 wt% All-PcH and 100 wt% All-PcH.
Figure 4Contact angle for pectin hydrogels with (a) 100 wt% All-PcH and (b) 90 wt% All-PcH allantoin concentrations.
Figure 5SEM micrographs for pectin hydrogels with 100 wt% All-PcH and 90 wt% All-PcH.
Figure 6CSLM-10× magnification micrographs for pectin hydrogels with 90 wt% All-PcH and 100 wt% All-PcH.
Percentage size reduction of the surgical excision wounds in dorsal areas during the healing process.
|
| C (%) | PA (%) | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 18.48 ± 3.12 | 22.26 ± 9.38 | 0.28 |
| 8 | 47.49 ± 3.89a | 69.99 ± 6.02b | 0.006 |
| 15 | 83.99 ± 2.15a | 90.44 ± 2.90b | 0.018 |
| 21 | 93.58 ± 3.70a | 100b | 0.048 |
LSD (least Significance difference) Test (n = 16for each group test (p < 0.05)).
Figure 7Images of wound in the dorsal area during the healing process.