| Literature DB >> 33123496 |
Alexandra A Wolfarth1, Taylor M Smith1, David VanInsberghe1, Anne Lang Dunlop2, Andrew S Neish1, Elizabeth J Corwin2, Rheinallt M Jones3.
Abstract
Disease states are often linked to large scale changes in microbial community structure that obscure the contributions of individual microbes to disease. Establishing a mechanistic understanding of how microbial community structure contribute to certain diseases, however, remains elusive thereby limiting our ability to develop successful microbiome-based therapeutics. Human microbiota-associated (HMA) mice have emerged as a powerful approach for directly testing the influence of microbial communities on host health and disease, with the transfer of disease phenotypes from humans to germ-free recipient mice widely reported. We developed a HMA mouse model of the human vaginal microbiota to interrogate the effects of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) on pregnancy outcomes. We collected vaginal swabs from 19 pregnant African American women with and without BV (diagnosed per Nugent score) to colonize female germ-free mice and measure its impact on birth outcomes. There was considerable variability in the microbes that colonized each mouse, with no association to the BV status of the microbiota donor. Although some of the women in the study had adverse birth outcomes, the vaginal microbiota was not predictive of adverse birth outcomes in mice. However, elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the uterus of HMA mice were detected during pregnancy. Together, these data outline the potential uses and limitations of HMA mice to elucidate the influence of the vaginal microbiota on health and disease.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial vaginosis (BV); humanization; inflammation; pregnancy; vaginal microbiota
Year: 2020 PMID: 33123496 PMCID: PMC7574503 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.570025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Clinical parameters of the 19 pregnant women used for HMA mouse generation.
| Age, years (mean ± sd) | 25.1 ± 5.06 |
| African American | 19 (100%) |
| Less than high school | 6 (31.6%) |
| High school or GED | 6 (31.6%) |
| Some college | 6 (31.6%) |
| College graduate | 1 (5.3%) |
| Medicaid | 17 (89.5%) |
| Private | 2 (10.5%) |
| Normal (0–3) | 7 (36.8%) |
| Intermediate (4–6) | 4 (21.1%) |
| BV (7+) | 8 (42.1%) |
| Gestational Hypertension | 1(5.3%) |
| Gestational Diabetes | 1(5.3%) |
| Prior term birth | 11 (57.9%) |
| Prior preterm birth | 3 (15.8%) |
| Full term | 10 (52.6%) |
| Early term | 6 (31.6%) |
| Preterm | 1(5.3%) |
| Spontaneous abortion | 1(5.3%) |
| Yes | 7 (36.8%) |
| No | 12 (63.2%) |
Full term (39 weeks≥), Early term (39 weeks < x ≤ 36 weeks), Preterm (36 weeks <).
Urogenital infection and antibiotic/antifungal use among the 19 pregnant women during pregnancy.
| 1 | 8 | White/Gray | ||||
| 2 | 1 | NR | ||||
| 3 | 1 | Clear | ||||
| 4 | 7 | White/Gray | BV | Cleocin | 12.2* | |
| 5 | 0 | Clear | ||||
| 6 | 7 | White/Gray | Trichomoniasis | Flagyl | 30 | |
| 7 | 5 | Clear | Chlamydia | Zithromax | 12 | |
| 8 | 6 | White/Gray | Gonorrhea | Ceftriaxone | 10* | |
| 9 | 0 | Clear | GBS UTI | Cephalexin | Clotrimazole | 6.5* |
| 10 | 7 | White/Gray | ||||
| 11 | 8 | White/Gray | ||||
| 12 | 0 | NR | BV | Flagyl | 34.5 | |
| 13 | 6 | NR | ||||
| 14 | 5 | NR | ||||
| 15 | 7 | White/Gray | ||||
| 16 | 0 | Clear | ||||
| 17 | 0 | Clear | ||||
| 18 | 8 | White/Gray | Trichomoniasis | Flagyl | 8* | |
| 19 | 10 | NR |
NR, Not Recorded; GA, Gestational Age. Asterisk denotes antibiotic/antifungal use prior to vaginal swab collection.
Figure 1Pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis harbor a distinct microbiota community structure. (A,B) Relative abundance of bacterial genera within the vaginal tract (A) and rectum (B) of pregnant women assigned as Normal, Intermediate, or BV by Nugent score described in Table 1. Data represents the top 10 most abundant bacterial genera detected. Each column represents one patient. (C) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot depicting the beta-diversity of the microbiota community structure within the vaginal tract and the rectum of pregnant patients described in Table 1. (D) Shannon diversity index of patient vaginal microbiota determined via 16S rRNA gene sequencing according to patient Nugent score. Data graphed as mean ± SEM. (E) Gestational age of delivery for pregnant patients described in Table 1 with either a normal, intermediate or BV Nugent score. Data graphed as mean ± SEM. (F) Birth weight of infant delivered by patients described in Table 1 with a normal, intermediate or BV Nugent score. Data graphed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance determined via One-way ANOVA, Turkey's multiple comparison test (D,F) or Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn's multiple comparisons test (E). *p < 0.05. n = 19 patients.
Figure 2Generation of human microbiota-associated (HMA) mice harboring the microbiota collected from the vaginal tract of pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. (A) Graphical depiction of experimental approach to generate human microbiota-associated (HMA) mice harboring the microbiota collected from the vaginal tract of pregnant patients described in Table 1. Swabs were collected from the vaginal tract and immediately transported to the Emory Gnotobiotic Animal Core (EGAC). The vaginal tract of female germ-free C57BL/6 were inoculated by physically wiping the swab on the vaginal opening of the mouse. Mice were then housed in Tecniplast ISOcageP Bioexclusion cages for the microbiota to colonize. After 2 weeks, a male germ-free mouse was introduced to the HMA female mouse and conception monitored. On 18.5 dpc (days post-coitum), pregnant female mice were sacrificed under sterile conditions for sample collection and analysis. (B) Relative abundance of the bacterial genera detected via 16S analysis in the vaginal tract of HMA mice on 18.5 dpc. Data represents the top 10 bacterial genera detected and each stacked column represents one mouse. Data is separated by BV status of the corresponding human donor. The total read count for each sample is provided at the top of each bar. NA (not assigned) refers to sequences that were unclassifiable at this taxonomic level. (C) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot depicting the beta-diversity of the microbiota community structure within the vaginal tract and gastrointestinal tract of HMA mice on 18.5 dpc. Symbols are colored by the Nugent score of the corresponding human donor.
Figure 3Pregnancy outcomes in human microbiota-associated (HMA) mice harboring the microbiota collected from the vaginal tract of pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. (A) The number of pups detected in the uterine horns of HMA mice on 18.5 dpc separated by the Nugent score of the corresponding donor. Data graphed as mean ± SEM. (B) Shannon diversity index of the mouse vaginal microbiota determined via 16S analysis on 18.5 dpc separated by litter size of the pregnant HMA mouse. Less than 7 pups on 18.5 dpc is considered a small litter, while 7 or more pups is considered a large litter. Data graphed as mean ± SEM. (C) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot depicting the beta-diversity of the microbiota community structure within the vaginal tract of HMA mice on 18.5 dpc. Symbols are colored by the litter size on 18.5 dpc.
Figure 4Pregnancy outcome in human microbiota-associated (HMA) mice is associated with altered uterine cytokine levels during pregnancy. (A) Cytokine concentrations in the uterus of HMA mice on 18.5 dpc. Cytokine levels are plotted with respect to the litter size. Statistical significance determined using linear regression analysis, p-value is indicated on the figure for each cytokine. (B) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) analysis depicting the correlation between cytokines concentrations in the uterus that were significantly altered or trending toward significance in (A), the HMA mouse vaginal microbiota community, and the Nugent score of the corresponding donor patient.