| Literature DB >> 33123131 |
Quan Zhuang1,2, Haozheng Cai1, Qingtai Cao3, Zixin Li3, Shu Liu1,2, Yingzi Ming1,2.
Abstract
Over a half century, organ transplantation has become an effective method for the treatment of end-stage visceral diseases. Although the application of immunosuppressants (IS) minimizes the rate of allograft rejection, the common use of IS bring many adverse effects to transplant patients. Moreover, true transplant tolerance is very rare in clinical practice. Dendritic cells (DCs) are thought to be the most potent antigen-presenting cells, which makes a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity. Among their subsets, a small portion of DCs with immunoregulatory function was known as tolerogenic DC (Tol-DC). Previous reports demonstrated the ability of adoptively transferred Tol-DC to approach transplant tolerance in animal models. In this study, we summarized the properties, ex vivo generation, metabolism, and clinical attempts of Tol-DC. Tol-DC is expected to become a substitute for IS to enable patients to achieve immune tolerance in the future.Entities:
Keywords: dendritic cell; immune tolerance; metabolism; organ transplantation; tolerogenic dendritic cell
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33123131 PMCID: PMC7573100 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.552988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1An overview of isolation and expansion procedures of Tol-DC from PBMC and their administration in clinical approaches. PBMC are the source of DC in human. CD14+monocytes were extracted by immunomagnetic separation. Under the stimulation of GM-CSF and IL-4, monocytes were differentiated to DC. The source of DC can be from either donor-derived or autologous DC loaded with donor peptide. Tol-DC can be induced by clinical approved drugs, cytokines, experimental inhibitors, and genetic engineering or biological intervention. After purification and identification. Tol-DC can be transferred to the potential patients through intravenous injection.
Figure 2The function and effects of Tol-DC. Tol-DC are characterized by low expression of costimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, and MHC-II. Tol-DC decrease the proliferation of T cells through apoptosis, anergy, and hyporesponsiveness. Meanwhile, they can promote Treg and Breg induction. The mechanism of this process, including contact-dependent and contact-independent mechanisms. Contact-dependent mechanisms include PD-L1, Fas-L, and ILT3/4. Contact-independent mechanisms include the expression of anti-inflammatory molecules, such as IL-10, TGF-β, IL-35, IL-27, and MIC-1. Tol-DC can also exhibit their function through the expression of IDO, HO-1, and lactate. The interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 delivers inhibitory signals to T cells and contributes to the anergy of T cells. Fas-L expressed on DC can induce T cell apoptosis by combining with Fas expressed on T cells. The increased expression of ILT3/ILT4 in DC contributes to Treg induction. Similarly, IL-10 and TGF-β can broadly inhibit T cell activation by interfering with T cell receptor signaling and eventually promote Treg induction by IDO production. In addition, both IL-27 and IL-35 are considered as important regulators of adaptive immune responses. The high expression of IL-27 was correlated with the induction of IL-10 expressing CD4+ T cells, and IL-35 overexpressed DC could increase Treg. DC transfected with MIC expression adenovirus could enhance T cell exhaustion and Treg proliferation. IDO catalyzes tryptophan degradation to form kynurenines, which consequently, impairs T cell proliferation and promotes Treg differentiation. HO-1 catalyzes the conversion of protoporphyrin to biliverdin, Fe2+, and CO. HO-1 could promote Treg differentiation and prevent T cell–mediated inflammatory diseases because of the increased CO level. Tol-DC could produce high levels of lactate that shape T cell responses toward tolerance, including declines of glycolysis and activation and proliferation in T cell. In addition to T cell modification, Tol-DC can conditionally induce Breg proliferation, too.
Experimental details of Tol-DC transfer in animal transplant models.
| Induction strategy | Phenotype of Tol-DC | Intervention | Transplanted model | Mechanism | Reference No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DC pretreated with Cobalt Protoporphyrin (COPP) | HO-1highMHC-IIlowCD40lowCD80lowCD86low | Donor-derived Tol-DC(day -7, 5 × 106 i.v.) | Allogeneic mouse cardiac | IFN-γ+ T cell↓, alloantibody production↓ | ( |
| DC infected with Recombinant human growth differentiation factor 15(GDF15) expression adenovirus | GDF15highCD40lowCD80low | Autologous Tol-DC (day -7, 1 × 106 i.v.) + Rapamycin (day 0-7,1mg/kg, i.p.) | Allogeneic mouse cardiac | T cell exhaustion↑, CD4+ FOXP3+Treg↑ | ( |
| DC treated with recombinant IL-35/Ebi3 | MHC-IIlowCD86lowCD80low | Donor-derived Tol-DC (day -1, 1 × 105 i.v.) | Allogeneic mouse cardiac | CD4+CD25+ FOXP3+Treg↑ | ( |
| DC cultured with urine induced pluripotent stem cells | CD11bhighCD11chighMHC-IIlowCD86lowCD80low | Donor-derived TolDC (day -7, 1 × 106 i.v.) | Allogeneic mouse cardiac | CD4+CD25+ FOXP3+Treg↑, cytotoxic T cell↓, TNF-α↓, IL-1β↓, IL-6↓ | ( |
| DC2.4 cells transduced with pAd5/F35-GFP-Jagged-1 viruses | Jagged-1highMHC-IIintermediateCD80intermediateCD86intermediate | Exogenous Tol-DC (day -1, 5 × 106 i.v.)+ anti-CD40L mAb (day 0, 2, 4 and 6, 0.25mg, i.p.) | Allogeneic mouse cardiac | CD4+CD25+ FOXP3+Treg↑, TGF-β↑, IFN-γ↓ | ( |
| DC infected with Relb shRNA expressing lentivirus, activated by LPS | RelblowMHC-IIlowCD86lowCD80lowCD83low | Donor-derived Tol-DC (day -7, 5 × 106 i.v.) | Allogeneic mouse cardiac | CD4+CD25+ FOXP3+Treg↑ | ( |
| DC pretreated with LF 15-0195 | MHC-IIlowCD86lowCD40low | Exogenous Tol-DC (day -7, 5 × 106 i.v.) | Allogeneic mouse cardiac | CD4+CD25+CTLA4+T cell↑, CD4+CD25+ FOXP3+Treg↑ | ( |
| DC treated with 0.1ng/ml GM-CSF | CD11chighMHC-IIlowCD80lowCD86low | Autologous Tol-DC (day -1, 1 × 106 i.v.) + anti-CD3 Ab (day -1, 300mg, i.v.) | Allogeneic mouse islet | T cell activation↓, alloantibody production↓, CD4+ FOXP3+Tregs↑ | ( |
| DCs treated with IL-10 | MHC-IIlowCD40lowCD86lowCD205lowIL-12p70lowTNF-αlowIL-6lowIL-10high | Autologous Tol-DC (day -1, 2 × 106 i.v.) | Xenogeneic (rat-mouse) islet | Graft-infiltrating CD8+CD28- and CD8+PD1+ suppressor T cell↑ | ( |
| DCs conditioned with TGF-β, activated by LPS | MHC-IIintermediateCD80lowCD86lowIL-12p70low | Donor-derived Tol-DC (day 0, 5× 105 i.v.) | Syngeneic mouse islet | FOXP3+Treg ↑ | ( |
| DCs conditioned with TNF-α and α1-Antitrypsin | MHC-IIlowCD86lowCD80lowIL-6lowIL-12lowIL-10high | Autologous Tol-DC (day 0, 2 × 106 i.v.) | Allogeneic rat kidney | FOXP3+Treg↑, TGF-β↑, IL-6↓, IFN-γ↓ | ( |
| DCs treated with 0.4ng/ml GM-CSF | CD11chighMHC-IIlowCD80lowCD86low | Autologous Tol-DC (day -1, 1 × 106 i.v.) + anti-CD3Abs (day −1, 1, 3, 5 and 7, 1mg, i.p.) | Syngeneic mouse skin | CD8+ FOXP3+Treg↑ | ( |
| DC cotransfected with plasmids encoding EGFP-hTGF-β1 and EGFP-hFasL | TGF-βhighFas-LhighCD85lowCD80low | Exogenous Tol-DC (day -5, 2× 106 i.v.) | Allogeneic rat liver | IL-10↑, IL-1↓, IL-12↓ | ( |
| DC treated by GM-CSF,IL-10 and FLT3L | MHC-IIlowCD86lowCD40lowCD80low | Donor-derived Tol-DC (day -7, 2× 106 i.v.)+Penicillin (day 0, 500u/10g, subcutaneous) | Allogeneic rat kidney | IL-2↓, IFN-γ↓, IL-4↑, IL-10↑, CD4+CD25+ FOXP3+Treg↑ | ( |
| DCs stimulated by VitD3 and IL-10 | CD14highMHC-IIlowCD86lowCD83lowCD80lowPD-L1high | Donor-derived Tol-DC (day -7 and 3, 5-10× 106 i.v.)+CTLA4 Ig (day -7 and -4, 12.5 mg/kg, day −1, 0, 2, 4, 7 and 10, 20mg/kg i.v.) + Tapered rapamycin maintenance | Allogeneic monkey kidney | CD4+CD95+Tmem↓, CD8+CD95+Tmem↓ CTLA4 and PD-1 expressed on Tmem↑ | ( |
| DCs stimulated by VitD3 and IL-10 | CD14highMHC-IIlowCD86lowCD83lowCD80lowPD-L1high | Donor-derived Tol-DC (day -7 and 3, 5-10× 106 i.v.)+CTLA4 Ig (day -7 and -4, 12.5 mg/kg, day −1, 0, 2, 4, 7 and 10, 20mg/kg i.v.) + Tapered rapamycin maintenance | Allogeneic monkey kidney | Donor-specific EomeslowCTLA4highCD8+ central Tmem↑ | ( |
| DCs stimulated by VitD3 and IL-10 | CD14highMHC-IIlowCD86lowCD83lowCD80lowPD-L1high | Donor-derived Tol-DC (day -7 and 3, 5-10× 106 i.v.)+CTLA4 Ig (day -7 and -4, 12.5 mg/kg, day −1, 0, 2, 4, 7 and 10, 20mg/kg i.v.) + Tapered rapamycin maintenance | Allogeneic monkey kidney | Donor-specific EomeslowCTLA4highCD8+ T cell↑, IL-17↓ | ( |
| DCs stimulated by VitD3 and IL-10 | CD14highMHC-IIlowCD86lowCD83lowCD80low | Donor-derived Tol-DC (day -7 and 3, 5-10× 106 i.v.)+CTLA4 Ig (day -7 and -4, 12.5 mg/kg, day −1, 0, 2, 4, 7 and 10, 20mg/kg i.v.) + Tapered rapamycin maintenance | Allogeneic monkey kidney | Donor-Specific CD4+CTLA4high T Cell proliferation | ( |
Figure 3The metabolism modification of Tol-DC. Tol-DC are usually characterized by increased OXPHOS and FAO but decreased ROS and glycolysis. The inhibition of mTOR is correlated with the tolerogenic metabolism in DC. AMPK is one of the main protein kinases regulating glucose metabolism and is located upstream of the mTOR1. The increased expression and activation of AMPK decrease the expression and activation of AMPK downstream kinase mTOR1. The PPAR-γ is the downstream target of mTOR1. The inhibition of mTOR1 can also decrease expression of PPAR-γ, which is a response to lipid metabolism in DC. HIF-1α is responsible for sustained glycolytic reprogramming in DC. The blockage of mTOR1 can influence the expression of HIF-1α. mTOR2 can inhibit mTOR1-regulated metabolic function in DC. Additionally, the blockade of Syk signaling leads to a decrease in levels of iNOS and NOX2, which contributes to the decreased glycolysis and ROS in DC. Nrf2/HO-1 can inhibit the production of iNOS, thereby restoring OXPHOS as the energy source in Tol-DC.