| Literature DB >> 33123092 |
Simiao Tian1,2, Yazhuo Liu3, Ao Feng3, Shulong Zhang1.
Abstract
Background: Although obesity is a well-known risk factor for hyperuricemia, it remains unclear whether obese subjects with metabolically healthy status have a decreased the risk of hyperuricemia and whether sex modifies the association of metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) with hyperuricemia risk. We aimed to investigate the sex-specific association between MHO and other obesity phenotypes and hyperuricemia, and to use Bayesian networks to determine and visualize the interactions among hyperuricemia and its related factors.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian network (BN); hyperuricemia; metabolic health; obesity; sex-specific
Year: 2020 PMID: 33123092 PMCID: PMC7573308 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.573452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Study sample characteristics of subjects according to sex.
| Total | Men | Women |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7,364 | 3,419 | 3,945 | |
| Age, years | 50.30 ± 14.45 | 50.31 ± 14.63 | 50.29 ± 14.3 | 0.972 |
| Weight, kg | 61.63 ± 10.58 | 66.09 ± 10.57 | 57.77 ± 8.95 | <0.001 |
| Height, cm | 161.08 ± 8.53 | 167.04 ± 6.6 | 155.91 ± 6.37 | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.68 ± 3.15 | 23.62 ± 3.11 | 23.73 ± 3.19 | 0.156 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 83.31 ± 9.76 | 84.95 ± 9.58 | 81.89 ± 9.68 | <0.001 |
| Hip circumference, cm | 95.01 ± 7.49 | 95.21 ± 7.33 | 94.85 ± 7.62 | 0.038 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.43 ± 0.46 | 1.38 ± 0.46 | 1.47 ± 0.45 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 3.00 ± 0.98 | 2.94 ± 0.97 | 3.05 ± 0.99 | <0.001 |
| DBP, mm Hg | 80.73 ± 11.26 | 82.35 ± 10.97 | 79.33 ± 11.33 | <0.001 |
| SBP, mm Hg | 124.76 ± 18.73 | 126.11 ± 17.25 | 123.6 ± 19.84 | <0.001 |
| FPG, mmol/L | 5.32 ± 1.24 | 5.38 ± 1.4 | 5.27 ± 1.09 | <0.001 |
| TC, mmol/L | 4.88 ± 1.00 | 4.83 ± 0.97 | 4.92 ± 1.03 | <0.001 |
| TG, mmol/L | 1.68 ± 1.46 | 1.8 ± 1.67 | 1.58 ± 1.23 | <0.001 |
| Urea, mmol/L | 5.46 ± 1.55 | 5.8 ± 1.56 | 5.16 ± 1.48 | <0.001 |
| Uric Acid, μmol/L | 307.95 ± 105.42 | 356.14 ± 111.38 | 266.18 ± 78.98 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.65 ± 6.74 | 3.76 ± 6.96 | 3.55 ± 6.55 | 0.171 |
| hsCRP | 2.42 ± 6.35 | 2.67 ± 7.5 | 2.21 ± 5.15 | 0.002 |
| HbA1c | 5.58 ± 0.75 | 5.59 ± 0.8 | 5.57 ± 0.72 | 0.216 |
| Smoker, n (%) | 2,271 (30.8%) | 2,121 (62%) | 150 (3.8%) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol drinker, n (%) | 2,434 (33.1%) | 2,090 (61.1%) | 344 (8.7%) | <0.001 |
| Urban resident, n (%) | 5,033 (68.3%) | 2,347 (68.6%) | 2,686 (68.1%) | 0.624 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 378 (5.1%) | 210 (6.1%) | 168 (4.3%) | <0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 2,548 (34.6%) | 1,286 (37.6%) | 1,262 (32%) | <0.001 |
| Components of ATP-III- based MetS criteria | ||||
| Reduced HDL-C, n (%) | 1,898 (25.8%) | 605 (17.7%) | 1,293 (32.8%) | <0.001 |
| Elevated BP, n (%) | 3,060 (41.6%) | 1,576 (46.1%) | 1,484 (37.6%) | <0.001 |
| Elevated TG, n (%) | 2,406 (32.7%) | 1,226 (35.9%) | 1,180 (29.9%) | <0.001 |
| Elevated FPG, n (%) | 1,805 (24.5%) | 896 (26.2%) | 909 (23%) | 0.002 |
| Abdominal obesity, n (%) | 3,942 (53.5%) | 1,697 (49.6%) | 2,245 (56.9%) | <0.001 |
| MetS, n (%) | 2,687 (36.5%) | 1,276 (37.3%) | 1,411 (35.8%) | 0.175 |
| Age groups | ||||
| 18–39 years | 1,834 (24.9%) | 873 (25.5%) | 961 (24.4%) | 0.183 |
| 40–59 years | 3,645 (49.5%) | 1,653 (48.3%) | 1,992 (50.5%) | |
| ≥60 years | 1,885 (25.6%) | 893 (26.1%) | 992 (25.1%) | |
| BMI levels | ||||
| Normal weight, n (%) | 4,280 (58.1%) | 1,981 (57.9%) | 2,299 (58.3%) | 0.038 |
| Overweight, n (%) | 2,355 (32.0%) | 1,128 (33.0%) | 1,227 (31.1%) | |
| Obese, n (%) | 729 (9.9%) | 310 (9.1%) | 419 (10.6%) | |
Data are reported as the mean (SD) or n (%).
BMI, body mass index; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HOMA-IR, homoeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ATP-III, the Adult Treatment Panel-III; MetS, metabolic syndrome.
Figure 1Distribution of ATP-III criteria-based metabolic obesity phenotypes according to by sex. ATP-III, the Adult Treatment Panel-III; MHNW, metabolically healthy normal-weight; MHOW, metabolically healthy overweight; MHO, metabolically healthy obese; MUNO, metabolically unhealthy non-obese; MHO, metabolically healthy obese; MUNW, metabolically unhealthy normal-weight; MUOW, metabolically unhealthy overweight; and MUO, metabolically unhealthy obese.
Sex-specific prevalence of hyperuricemia according to metabolic health and obesity status (metabolic obesity phenotypes).
| Metabolic health status | BMI levels | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolically healthy | Normal weight (MHNW) | 11.4 (9.9–13.1) | 4 (3.2–5.1) |
| Overweight (MHOW) | 16.6 (13.7–19.8) | 5.5 (4–7.4) | |
| Obese (MHO) | 15.4 (9.3–24.3) | 8.5 (4.8–14.3) | |
| Metabolically unhealthy | Normal weight (MUNW) | 23.6 (20.1–27.5) | 18.7 (15.8–22) |
| Overweight (MUOW) | 39.4 (35.4–43.6) | 23 (19.6–26.8) | |
| Obese (MUO) | 38.4 (32.2–44.9) | 30.7 (25.5–36.4) |
The metabolic health status was defined by ATP-III; the obesity status was defined by body mass index. Abbreviations: ATP-III, the Adult Treatment Panel-III; MHNW, metabolically healthy normal-weight; MHOW, metabolically healthy overweight; MHO, metabolically healthy obese; MUNO, metabolically unhealthy non-obese; MHO, metabolically healthy obese; MUNW, metabolically unhealthy normal-weight; MUOW, metabolically unhealthy overweight; and MUO, metabolically unhealthy obese.
Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between MHO and hyperuricemia by sex.
| ATP-III-based criteria | Total (OR, 95% CI) | Men (OR, 95% CI) | Women (OR, 95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |
| MHNW | 1 (Reference) | 1 (Reference) | 1 (Reference) | 1 (Reference) | 1 (Reference) | 1 (Reference) |
| MHOW | 1.44 (1.15–1.8) | 1.49 (1.18–1.87) | 1.51 (1.15–1.99) | 1.63 (1.23–2.15) | 1.27 (0.84–1.91) | 1.28 (0.84–1.93) |
| MHO |
|
| 1.26 (0.69–2.28) | 1.46 (0.8–2.68) |
|
|
| MUNW | 3.22 (2.63–3.93) | 2.37 (1.92–2.93) | 2.48 (1.91–3.23) | 1.74 (1.31–2.32) | 4.24 (3.06–5.88) | 3.34 (2.39–4.69) |
| MUOW | 5.43 (4.49–6.55) | 3.92 (3.21–4.78) | 5.1 (4.02–6.46) | 3.57 (2.77–4.6) | 5.68 (4.12–7.84) | 4.45 (3.2–6.2) |
| MUO | 6.56 (5.2–8.28) | 4.69 (3.66–6.01) | 4.73 (3.44–6.5) | 3.47 (2.46–4.91) | 8.91 (6.23–12.74) | 6.31 (4.33–9.18) |
Data are presented as odds ratios (95% confidence intervals).
ATP-III, the Adult Treatment Panel-III; MHNW, metabolically healthy normal-weight; MHOW, metabolically healthy overweight; MHO, metabolically healthy obese; MUNO, metabolically unhealthy non-obese; MHO, metabolically healthy obese; MUNW, metabolically unhealthy normal-weight; MUOW, metabolically unhealthy overweight; and MUO, metabolically unhealthy obese. Model 1: Adjusted for age, urban/rural resident, smoking status, alcohol status, and metabolic health-obesity phenotypes. Model 2: Adjusted for Model 1+ white blood cell, total cholesterol, LDL-C, hsCRP and diabetes.
The bold values mean the results are significant for MHO groups.
Figure 2Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for hyperuricemia associated with Adult Treatment Panel-III metabolic components, body mass index categories, and metabolic status by sex. Horizontal bars are 95% CIs. The adjusted OR was obtained from model 2 which was adjusted for age, urban/rural resident, smoking status, alcohol status, and metabolic health-obesity phenotypes, white blood cell, total cholesterol, LDL-C, hs-CRP, and diabetes.
Figure 3The DAG underlying the Bayesian network learned from the covariates and hyperuricemia. (A) Averaged DAG with strength of arcs greater than 0.5; (B) Simplified DAG derived from the averaged DAG after retaining arcs with a strength greater than 0.85. Abbreviations: DAG, directed acyclic graph; MetS, metabolic syndrome; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; WaistCir, waist circumference.
The conditional probability distribution table of hyperuricemia events given different metabolic health and obesity statuses, sexes, and the presence of diabetes.
| BMI group | Number of metabolic components | Other factors | Hyperuricemia Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal weight | 0 | 0.05 | |
| Obese | 0 | 0.10 | |
| Obese | 1 | 0.14 | |
| Obese | 2 | 0.31 | |
| Obese | 4 | 0.56 | |
| Obese | 0 | Sex: Men | 0.076 |
| Obese | 0 | Sex: Women | 0.124 |
| Obese | 4 | Presence of Diabetes: Yes | 0.606 |