| Literature DB >> 33122478 |
Ayşe Berna Yüzbaşıoğulları1, Evrim Kömürcü-Bayrak1, Altan Onat2, Gunay Can3, Nina Mononen4, Reijo Laaksonen4, Mika Kähönen5, Terho Lehtimäki4, Nihan Erginel-Ünaltuna1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: TCF7L2 is a repressor and transactivator of genes, and its variants are strongly associated with diabetes. This study aimed to evaluate the sex-specific relationship between the most common TCF7L2 gene variants (-98368G>T, rs12255372 and -47833C>T, rs7903146) with diabetes and coronary heart disease in Turkish Adult Risk Factor (TARF) Study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33122478 PMCID: PMC7724383 DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.57736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anatol J Cardiol ISSN: 2149-2263 Impact factor: 1.596
Demographic and biochemical characteristics of the participants
| Characteristics | Men (n) | Women (n) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 55.3±12.1 (985) | 55.0±11.8 (1039) | 0.706 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 27.8±4.4 (965) | 30.6±5.7 (1016) | 0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 190.1±39.9 (983) | 202.5±40.8 (1039) | <0.001 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 40.1±10.9 (977) | 47.4±11.8 (1036) | <0.001 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 115.8±33.5 (950) | 123.9±35 (1017) | <0.001 |
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 101.7±38.85 (968) | 99.4±35.2 (1028) | 0.371 |
| Fasting triglycerides, mg/dL | 147.9±1.74 (942) | 134.9±1.62 (1009) | <0.001 |
| HOMA index | 2±2.29 (654) | 2±2.09 (742) | 0.201 |
| Insulin, mIU/L | 8.32±2.04 (658) | 8.51±1.86(744) | 0.075 |
| Lipoprotein(a), mg/dL | 8.13±3.09(398) | 11.48±3.02 (398) | <0.001 |
| CRP, mg/dL | 1.05±4.57 (588) | 1.23±4.37 (620) | 0.037 |
| Apolipoprotein A1, mg/dL | 132.53±24.28 (550) | 146.4±27.60 (583) | 0.001 |
| Apolipoprotein B, mg/dL | 99.7±26.23 (555) | 103.06±26.64 (591) | 0.068 |
| Systolic BP, mm Hg | 123.9±20.46 (978) | 128.9±23.39 (1030) | <0.001 |
| Diastolic BP, mm Hg | 78.5±11.67 (978) | 79.9±12.4 (1030) | 0.008 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.97±0.37 (976) | 0.86±0.08 (1032) | 0.001 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 96.3±11.18 (978) | 93.1±12.56 (1034) | <0.001 |
| Testosterone, ng/dL | 7.59±2.34 (454) | 3.16±3.47 (457) | <0.001 |
| SHBG, nmol/L | 40.7±1.62 (441) | 50.1±1.67 (423) | <0.001 |
| Type 2 diabetes, % (n) | 13.4 (132) | 10.1 (105) | 0.021 |
| Hypertension, % (n) | 34.9 (344) | 47 (488) | <0.001 |
| Metabolic syndrome, % (n) | 39.1 (380) | 45.4 (468) | 0.004 |
| Coronary heart disease, % (n) | 15.3 (151) | 13 (135) | 0.129 |
| Obesity, % (n) | 26.9 (260) | 50.8 (516) | <0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia, % (n) | 32.9 (308) | 30.6 (308) | 0.286 |
| Current smoking, % (n) | 38.7 (375) | 14.5 (149) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol usage, % (n) | 26.9 (261) | 1.9 (19) | <0.001 |
| High physical activity, % (n) | 50.6 (489) | 27.1 (277) | <0.001 |
Continuous variables are presented as mean±SD and dichotomous variables as percentages. A two-tailed t-test
and Mann–Whitney U test were used for comparison of means, and X2-test was used for percentages. BP - blood pressure; CRP - C-reactive protein; HDL-C - high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C - low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA - homeostatic assessment; SHBG - sex-hormone binding globulin
Genotype and allele frequencies of TCF7L2 variants and diplotypes in all participants, men and women
| All participants | Men | Women | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype frequency | |||
| CC, % (n) | 42.2 (840) | 40.6 (393) | 43.7 (447) |
| CT, % (n) | 46.6 (927) | 46.0 (445) | 47.2 (482) |
| TT, % (n) | 11.2 (222) | 13.3 (129) | 9.1 (93) |
| Allele frequency | |||
| G, % | 65.5 | 63.7 | 67.3 |
| A, % | 34.5 | 36.3 | 32.7 |
| Genotype frequency | |||
| GG, % (n) | 44.0 (885) | 42.0 (410) | 46.0 (475) |
| GT, % (n) | 45.7 (918) | 46.6 (455) | 44.8 (463) |
| TT, % (n) | 10.3 (207) | 11.5 (112) | 9.2 (95) |
| Allele frequency | |||
| G, % | 66.9 | 65.3 | 68.4 |
| A, % | 33.1 | 34.7 | 31.6 |
| Diplotype frequency | |||
| H1-/H1- | 13.2 (267) | 14.8 (146) | 11.6 (121) |
| H1-/H1+ | 48.8 (988) | 48.8 (481) | 48.8 (507) |
| H1+/H1+ | 38.0 (769) | 36.3 (358) | 39.6 (411) |
The association between the genotype frequencies and sex was compared using the X2-test (
P=0.010,
P=0.096,
P=0.073)
Comparisons of multi-adjusted fasting glucose levels by TCF7L2 variants and diplotypes for all participants, men and women
| All Participants Glucose, mg/dL (n) | Men Glucose, mg/dL (n) | Women Glucose, mg/dL (n) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | 92.6±0.86 (727) | 93.4±1.31 (339) | 91.9±1.11 (388) | |||
| CT | 93.4±0.83 (783) | 0.029 | 94.1±1.25 (377) | 0.018 | 92.9±1.09 (406) | 0.810 |
| TT | 97.9±1.70 (186) | 100.7±2.30 (111) | 93.0±2.53 (75) | |||
| GG | 92.4±0.83 (774) | 93.5±1.28 (357) | 91.7±1.07 (417) | |||
| GT | 94.4±0.83 (765) | 0.244 | 94.9±1.41 (380) | 0.261 | 93.9±1.11 (385) | 0.147 |
| TT | 94.3±1.75 (175) | 97.9±2.46 (97) | 89.3±2.47 (78) | |||
| H1-/H1- | 96.6±1.54 (225) | 99.6±2.15 (126) | 92.6±2.19 (99) | |||
| H1-/H1+ | 93.6±0.80 (828) | 0.054 | 94.3±1.19 (407) | 0.037 | 93.0±1.06 (421) | 0.660 |
| H1+/H1+ | 92.3±0.89 (671) | 93.1±1.37 (308) | 91.6±1.15 (363) |
Subjects using antidiabetic medication were excluded from the analysis. Data is expressed as mean±SE. P-values are adjusted for the following covariates: age, cigarette smoking, physical activity, and obesity
Frequencies of TCF7L2 variants in all participants with type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease
| Clinical status of subjects | Genotype frequencies, % (n) | Rare allele frequency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -47833C>T | CC | CT | TT | T allele | |||
| 34.6 (79) | 47.8 (109) | 17.5 (40) | 0.002 | 0.41 | <0.001 | ||
| 43.2 (761) | 46.5 (818) | 10.3 (182) | 0.36 | ||||
| -98368G>T | GG | GT | TT | T allele | |||
| 34.6 (81) | 52.1 (122) | 13.2 (31) | 0.007 | 0.32 | 0.003 | ||
| 45.3 (804) | 44.8 (796) | 9.9 (176) | 0.39 | ||||
| -47833C>T | CC | CT | TT | T allele | |||
| 38.9 (107) | 45.1 (124) | 16.0 (44) | 0.022 | 0.39 | 0.030 | ||
| 42.8 (733) | 46.8 (802) | 10.4 (178) | 0.34 | ||||
| -98368G>T | GG | GT | TT | T allele | |||
| 38.6 (110) | 47.4 (135) | 14 (40) | 0.031 | 0.38 | 0.010 | ||
| 45 (775) | 45.4 (782) | 9.7 (167) | 0.32 | ||||
The association between the genotype/allele frequencies and clinical status was compared using the X2-test. CHD - coronary heart disease
Association of TCF7L2 variants and diplotypes with diabetes and coronary heart disease, by logistic regression analysis
| All Participants | Men | Women | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||||
| -47833C>T CT | 0.170 | 1.25 | 0.91-1.72 | 0.850 | 1.05 | 0.67-1.64 | 0.080 | 1.52 | 0.96-2.43 | |
| TT | <0.001 | 1.42-3.32 | 0.006 | 1.24-3.75 | 0.060 | 1.94 | 0.97-3.90 | |||
| -98368G>T GT | 0.021 | 1.06-1.96 | 0.410 | 1.20 | 0.78-1.85 | 0.021 | 1.08-2.67 | |||
| TT | 0.012 | 1.14-2.84 | 0.026 | 1.08-3.53 | 0.340 | 1.44 | 0.68-3.07 | |||
| H1-/H1- | 0.003 | 1.24-2.89 | 0.021 | 1.10-3.31 | 0.140 | 1.67 | 0.84-3.30 | |||
| H1+/H1- | 0.058 | 1.37 | 0.99-1.88 | 0.810 | 1.06 | 0.68-1.65 | 0.018 | 1.10-2.84 | ||
| -47833C>T CT | 0.650 | 1.08 | 0.77-1.52 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 0.63-1.69 | 0.600 | 1.14 | 0.71-1.81 | |
| TT | 0.055 | 1.59 | 0.99-2.54 | 0.043 | 1.02-3.48 | 0.720 | 1.15 | 0.53-2.49 | ||
| -98368G>T GT | 0.200 | 1.24 | 0.89-1.72 | 0.40 | 1.22 | 0.77-1.95 | 0.360 | 1.25 | 0.78-1.99 | |
| TT | 0.068 | 1.58 | 0.97-2.56 | 0.31 | 1.41 | 0.72-2.75 | 0.120 | 1.75 | 0.86-3.58 | |
| H1-/H1- | 0.040 | 1.02-2.49 | 0.06 | 1.79 | 0.98-3.28 | 0.390 | 1.34 | 069-2.63 | ||
| H1+/H1- | 0.830 | 1.04 | 0.74-1.46 | 0.73 | 1.09 | 0.67-1.78 | 0.950 | 0.99 | 0.62-1.58 | |
| -47833C>T CT | 0.830 | 1.04 | 0.74-1.46 | 0.880 | 1.04 | 0.64-1.7 | 0.910 | 1.03 | 0.43-1.64 | |
| TT | 0.060 | 1.58 | 0.98-2.57 | 0.070 | 1.83 | 0.96-3.49 | 0.530 | 1.27 | 0.60-2.69 | |
| -98368G>T GT | 0.370 | 1.16 | 0.84-1.62 | 0.500 | 1.18 | 0.74-1.88 | 0.600 | 1.13 | 0.71-1.81 | |
| TT | 0.090 | 1.53 | 0.93-2.52 | 0.550 | 1.24 | 0.61-2.55 | 0.080 | 1.88 | 0.93-3.76 | |
| H1-/H1- | 0.035 | 1.04-2.54 | 0.090 | 1.72 | 0.91-3.24 | 0.220 | 1.50 | 0.78-2.85 | ||
| H1+/H1- | 0.870 | 0.97 | 0.69-1.36 | 0.780 | 1.07 | 0.66-1.75 | 0.550 | 0.86 | 0.54-1.39 | |
Adjusted for age, cigarette smoking, physical activity and obesity. P-values were obtained with logistic regression analysis.
Subjects using antidiabetic medication were excluded from the analysis.
Subjects with type 2 diabetes were excluded from the analysis. Significant ORs are highlighted in boldface. OR - odds ratio; CI - confidence interval