Literature DB >> 33122336

Validation of Lung EpiCheck, a novel methylation-based blood assay, for the detection of lung cancer in European and Chinese high-risk individuals.

Mina Gaga1, Joanna Chorostowska-Wynimko2, Ildikó Horváth3, Martin C Tammemagi4, David Shitrit5, Vered H Eisenberg6, Hao Liang7, David Stav8, Dan Levy Faber9,10, Maarten Jansen11, Yael Raviv12, Vasileios Panagoulias13, Piotr Rudzinski2, Gabriel Izbicki14, Ohad Ronen15, Adiv Goldhaber16, Rawia Moalem17, Nadir Arber18, Ilana Haas19, Qinghua Zhou7.   

Abstract

AIM: Lung cancer screening reduces mortality. We aim to validate the performance of Lung EpiCheck, a six-marker panel methylation-based plasma test, in the detection of lung cancer in European and Chinese samples.
METHODS: A case-control European training set (n=102 lung cancer cases, n=265 controls) was used to define the panel and algorithm. Two cut-offs were selected, low cut-off (LCO) for high sensitivity and high cut-off (HCO) for high specificity. The performance was validated in case-control European and Chinese validation sets (cases/controls 179/137 and 30/15, respectively).
RESULTS: The European and Chinese validation sets achieved AUCs of 0.882 and 0.899, respectively. The sensitivities/specificities with LCO were 87.2%/64.2% and 76.7%/93.3%, and with HCO they were 74.3%/90.5% and 56.7%/100.0%, respectively. Stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sensitivity in European and Chinese samples with LCO was 78.4% and 70.0% and with HCO was 62.2% and 30.0%, respectively. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was represented only in the European set and sensitivities with LCO and HCO were 100.0% and 93.3%, respectively. In multivariable analyses of the European validation set, the assay's ability to predict lung cancer was independent of established risk factors (age, smoking, COPD), and overall AUC was 0.942.
CONCLUSIONS: Lung EpiCheck demonstrated strong performance in lung cancer prediction in case-control European and Chinese samples, detecting high proportions of early-stage NSCLC and SCLC and significantly improving predictive accuracy when added to established risk factors. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings. Utilising such a simple and inexpensive blood test has the potential to improve compliance and broaden access to screening for at-risk populations.
Copyright ©ERS 2021.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33122336      PMCID: PMC7806969          DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02682-2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  26 in total

1.  Performance of the Bladder EpiCheck™ Methylation Test for Patients Under Surveillance for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Blinded Clinical Trial.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes; Juan Morote; Erik B Cornel; Georgios Gakis; F Johannes P van Valenberg; Fernando Lozano; Itay A Sternberg; Ellen Willemsen; Miriam L Hegemann; Yossi Paitan; Ilan Leibovitch
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-07-17

Review 2.  Age-related clonal hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Liran I Shlush
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Total circulating cell-free DNA as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer before first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Hamfjord; T K Guren; O Dajani; J S Johansen; B Glimelius; H Sorbye; P Pfeiffer; O C Lingjærde; K M Tveit; E H Kure; N Pallisgaard; K-L G Spindler
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Quantification of methylated markers with a multiplex methylation-specific technology.

Authors:  Hongzhi Zou; Hatim Allawi; Xiaoming Cao; Mike Domanico; Jonathan Harrington; William R Taylor; Tracy Yab; David A Ahlquist; Graham Lidgard
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Lung Cancer Screening Utilization: A Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Analysis.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening.

Authors:  Martin C Tammemägi; Hormuzd A Katki; William G Hocking; Timothy R Church; Neil Caporaso; Paul A Kvale; Anil K Chaturvedi; Gerard A Silvestri; Tom L Riley; John Commins; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A real-time PCR assay for DNA-methylation using methylation-specific blockers.

Authors:  Susan E Cottrell; Jürgen Distler; Nancy S Goodman; Suzanne H Mooney; Antje Kluth; Alexander Olek; Ina Schwope; Reimo Tetzner; Heike Ziebarth; Kurt Berlin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Performance of a multiplexed dual analyte immunoassay for the early detection of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Victoria Doseeva; Tracey Colpitts; Grace Gao; Juliana Woodcock; Vladimir Knezevic
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Circulating tumor DNA quantity is related to tumor volume and both predict survival in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Marin Strijker; Eline C Soer; Matteo de Pastena; Aafke Creemers; Alberto Balduzzi; Jamie J Beagan; Olivier R Busch; Otto M van Delden; Hans Halfwerk; Jeanin E van Hooft; Krijn P van Lienden; Giovanni Marchegiani; Sybren L Meijer; Carel J van Noesel; Roy J Reinten; Eva Roos; Sandor Schokker; Joanne Verheij; Marc J van de Vijver; Cynthia Waasdorp; Johanna W Wilmink; Bauke Ylstra; Marc G Besselink; Maarten F Bijlsma; Frederike Dijk; Hanneke W van Laarhoven
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer in a randomised trial of an autoantibody blood test followed by imaging.

Authors:  Frank M Sullivan; Frances S Mair; William Anderson; Pauline Armory; Andrew Briggs; Cindy Chew; Alistair Dorward; John Haughney; Fiona Hogarth; Denise Kendrick; Roberta Littleford; Alex McConnachie; Colin McCowan; Nicola McMeekin; Manish Patel; Petra Rauchhaus; Lewis Ritchie; Chris Robertson; John Robertson; Jose Robles-Zurita; Joseph Sarvesvaran; Herbert Sewell; Michael Sproule; Thomas Taylor; Agnes Tello; Shaun Treweek; Kavita Vedhara; Stuart Schembri
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  5 in total

1.  Biomarkers in lung cancer screening: the importance of study design.

Authors:  David R Baldwin; Matthew E Callister; Philip A Crosbie; Emma L O'Dowd; Robert C Rintoul; Hilary A Robbins; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  Using All Our Genomes: Blood-based Liquid Biopsies for the Early Detection of Cancer.

Authors:  Eddie Adams; Gregory D Sepich-Poore; Sandrine Miller-Montgomery; Rob Knight
Journal:  View (Beijing)       Date:  2022-01-31

3.  Potential of Inflammatory Protein Signatures for Enhanced Selection of People for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Megha Bhardwaj; Ben Schöttker; Bernd Holleczek; Axel Benner; Petra Schrotz-King; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  DNA methylation analysis of tumor suppressor genes in liquid biopsy components of early stage NSCLC: a promising tool for early detection.

Authors:  Α Markou; D Londra; V Tserpeli; Ι Kollias; E Tsaroucha; I Vamvakaris; K Potaris; I Pateras; Α Kotsakis; V Georgoulias; Ε Lianidou
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 7.259

5.  Dynamics of methylated cell-free DNA in the urine of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Sander Bach; Birgit M M Wever; Mark A van de Wiel; Joris D Veltman; Sayed M S Hashemi; Geert Kazemier; Idris Bahce; Renske D M Steenbergen
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.861

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.