Literature DB >> 33120817

Impact of high triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (insulin resistance) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Huang-Chung Chen1, Wei-Chieh Lee1,2, Hsiu-Yu Fang1, Chih-Yuan Fang1, Chien-Jen Chen1, Cheng-Hsu Yang1, Chiung-Jen Wu1.   

Abstract

The ratio of triglyceride (TG)/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) has been proposed as an easily obtainable atherogenic marker and high TG/HDL-C ratio is associated with insulin resistance. This study investigated the associated between a high TG/HDL-C ratio and cardiovascular mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with or without diabetes mellitus (DM).Between January 2005 and December 2014, 1661 patients with STEMI underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention in our hospital. Of these, 289 were classified into group 1 (with both DM and a high TG/HDL-C ratio), 295 into group 2 (with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio), 501 into group 3 (without DM, but a high TG/HDL-C ratio), and 576 into group 4 (without DM or a high TG/HDL-C ratio).Older age, longer chest pain to reperfusion time, poor hemodynamic condition, and higher prevalence of multiple vessel coronary artery disease were noted in those with DM. Poor outcomes including higher 30-day and 1-year cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality rates were noted in those with DM but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. Patients with DM but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio had a Hazard ratio of 3.637 for cardiovascular mortality relative to those without DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio.Even though a high TG/HDL-C ratio is associated with insulin resistance, patients with or without DM, but with a high TG/HDL-C ratio had better 30-day and 1-year outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33120817      PMCID: PMC7581178          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death and primary source of disease burden in developing and developed countries.[ Dyslipidemia is a prominent risk factor for CVD.[ Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with a statin is important in both primary and secondary intervention settings.[ On the other hand, increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is associated with a decrease in CVD, with an effect predominantly observed in patients with low HDL-C.[ Although the role of high LDL-C and low HDL-C in CVD development has been widely accepted, the role of hypertriglyceridemia remains controversial. As serum triglyceride (TG) levels are inversely correlated with in-hospital death and adverse late outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), a high serum TG level can be regarded as benign and not a target for aggressive therapy.[ The TG/HDL-C ratio has been proposed as an easily obtainable atherogenic marker[ and has been proposed as a predictor of insulin resistance.[ A high TG/HDL-C ratio is also correlated with LDL phenotype B,[ and small HDL particles,[ and is also associated with increased arterial stiffness and impaired heart rate recovery after exercise.[ In children, the TG/HDL-C ratio was found to be positively associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure and metabolic syndrome.[ The cut-off for the TG/HDL-C ratio varied among different ethnic groups and was reported to be 3.0 for non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans and 2.0 for non-Hispanic blacks.[ Cardiometabolic risk factors were more adverse in men and women whose TG/HDL-C ratio exceeded 3.5 and 2.5, respectively.[ In the acute phase of myocardial infarction (MI), the relationship between the TG/HDL-C ratio and cardiovascular outcomes is controversial. One study in patients with acute MI reported that a low TG level was associated with high in-hospital mortality. Another study in patients with acute coronary syndrome reported that a high TG/HDL ratio was a powerful independent predictor of all-cause mortality and a risk factor for cardiovascular events. Due to this gap in knowledge, the present study aimed to explore the relationship between the TG/HDL-C ratio and STEMI, and to determine the influence of insulin resistance in such patients.

Materials and methods

Patients and groups

Between January 2005 and December 2014, 1661 patients with STEMI underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital and were enrolled in the STEMI registry. A TG/HDL-C ratio higher than 3.5 in men and 2.5 in women was defined a high ratio 13. All patients underwent a fasting lipid profile within the first 3 days of hospitalization. Of these 1661 patients, 289 were classified into group 1 (with both DM and a high TG/HDL-C ratio), 295 into group 2 (with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio), 501 into group 3 (without DM, but with a high TG/HDL-C ratio), and 576 into group 4 (without DM or a high TG/HDL-C ratio). The baseline characteristics and cardiovascular mortality were compared among the 4 groups. The Institutional Review Committee on Human Research at our institution approved the study protocol.

Definitions

Our MI criteria were in accordance with the most recent universal definitions.[ Advanced heart failure (HF) was graded as greater than III, according to the New York Heart Association Classification. Based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definition, acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine of at least 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or a 50% increase in serum creatinine from baseline within 7 days, or a urine volume of less than 0.5 mL/kg/h for at least 6 hours.[ Target vessel revascularization (TVR) was defined as any repeat PCI or coronary artery bypass graft for lesions with stenosis ≧70%, and a target vessel was defined as the entire major coronary vessel proximal and distal to the target lesion, including upstream and downstream branches and the target lesion itself.[ Cardiovascular mortality was defined as death related to an MI, cardiac arrhythmia, or HF. All-cause mortality was defined as death from any cause. A major adverse cardiac event (MACE) included an MI, TVR, and cardiovascular mortality.

Study endpoints

The primary endpoints of our study were recurrent MI, TVR, and cardiovascular mortality during the 30-day and 1-year follow-up period. The secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, regardless of cause, during the 30-day and 1-year follow-up period.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables, or as counts and percentages for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using an independent t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using a chi-square statistic. Multivariate Cox regression analysis included a hazard ratio (HR) < 0.100 for 1-year cardiovascular mortality in univariate Cox regression analyses. Multivariate Cox regression analyses on 1-year cardiovascular mortality were performed to determine the HR between groups. The patient without DM, but a high TG/HDL-C ratio was set as an HR of 1. A Kaplan-Meier curve was calculated for 1-year cardiovascular mortality in all groups. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 (IBM. Corp., Armonk. NY, USA). A P-value <.05 was statistically significant.

Results

In STEMI patients, significantly higher TG/HDL-C ratio was noted in patients with DM (DM vs non-DM; 4.08 ± 3.65 vs 3.62 ± 2.88; P = .012).

Baseline characteristics of study groups

Baseline characteristics of the 4 groups are listed in Table 1. The average age of groups with a high TG/HDL-C ratio was greater than that of groups without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. The prevalence of males was greater in groups without DM. The comorbidities in the 4 groups showed significant differences, except for the prevalence of prior MI. The prevalence of Killip class ≥III was greater in those with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. Longer chest pain-to-reperfusion time was observed in those with DM. Laboratory results showed significant differences between the 4 groups. Lower levels of total cholesterol and LDL-C were noted in those with DM patients, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. Higher HDL-C levels were noted in groups without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. Higher peak troponin-I levels and a worse left ventricular ejection fraction were noted in patients with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. Higher prevalence of anterior wall infarction was noted in groups without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. Higher prevalence of multiple vessel disease was noted in patients with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. More intensive guideline-based treatment was applied in patients without DM, but with a high TG/HDL-C ratio.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio and non-DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio.

Baseline characteristics of DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio and non-DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio.

Angiographic characteristics of study groups

Angiographic characteristics of the 4 groups are listed in Table 2. Larger pre-PCI reference luminal diameter (RLD) was noted in groups without DM. Smaller post-PCI minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was noted those with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. Larger post-PCI RLD was noted in groups without DM. The method of reperfusion showed no significant difference among the 4 groups. Those with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio, had higher prevalence of mechanical support.
Table 2

Angiographic characteristics of DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio and non-DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio.

Angiographic characteristics of DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio and non-DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio.

Thirty-day and one-year clinical outcomes

Clinical outcomes are listed in Table 3. A higher incidence of post-PCI AKI was noted in those with DM. A higher incidence of 30-day cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality was noted in those with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. Higher 1-year MACE, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality rates were noted in those with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio.
Table 3

Clinical outcomes of DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio and non-DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio.

Clinical outcomes of DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio and non-DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio. The Kaplan-Meier curve for 1-year cardiovascular mortality showed the poorest result in those with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio (log rank P < .001) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curve for 1-year cardiovascular mortality: In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, patients with diabetes mellitus, but without a high triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, had a worse clinical outcome than the other 3 groups (log rank P < .001).

Kaplan-Meier curve for 1-year cardiovascular mortality: In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, patients with diabetes mellitus, but without a high triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, had a worse clinical outcome than the other 3 groups (log rank P < .001).

Multivariate Cox regression analysis for 1-year cardiovascular mortality

Multivariate Cox regression for 1-year cardiovascular mortality in the 4 groups is shown in Table 4. Those without DM, but a high TG/HDL-C ratio, were set as an HR of 1.000. Those with DM, but with a high TG/HDL-C ratio, had an HR of 2.050 (P = .049; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.002–4.193). Those with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio had an HR of 3.637 (P < .001; 95% CI = 1.904–6.947). Those without DM patients or a high TG/HDL-C ratio had an HR of 1.482 (P = .254; 95% CI = 0.753–2.914).
Table 4

Hazard ratio of 1-year cardiovascular mortality in DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio when comparing with non-DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio.

Hazard ratio of 1-year cardiovascular mortality in DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio when comparing with non-DM patients with or without a high TG/HDL-C ratio.

Discussion

Dyslipidemia is defined as elevated plasma concentration of lipid (TG, total cholesterol, and LDL-C) and as decreased plasma concentration of HDL-C.[ Strong scientific evidence indicates that there is a significant association between the incidence of CVD and high levels of LDL-C and low levels of HDL-C.[ In addition, high levels of TG are associated with an increase in LDL-C particles and increased cardiovascular risk.[ Many clinical studies have attempted to identify a marker of atherogenic dyslipidemia that can better predict the risk of CVD, and the atherogenic dyslipidemia index reflects the balance between atherogenic and antiatherogenic factors.[ The TG/HDL-C ratio is a strong predictor of the risk of atherosclerosis and CVD,[ as well as insulin resistance.[ However, few studies have focused on the effect of the TG/HDL-C ratio in STEMI. In addition, no studies have focused on the effect of the TG/HDL-C ratio in patients with and without DM. In patients with acute MI, two-thirds had low HDL-C levels, greater than three-fourths had total cholesterol level below 200 mg/dL, and greater than three-fourths had LDL-C level below 130 mg/dL.[ After STEMI, low HDL-C was associated with significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality.[ However, serum TG levels were inversely correlated with in-hospital mortality and adverse late outcomes in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI; thus a high serum TG level can be a benign factor.[ This lipid paradox was noted in STEMI patients, and high TG may not be a treatment target in the acute phase.[ However, 1 study showed that a high TG/HDL-C ratio may be independently associated with MACEs in female revascularized STEMI patients, but not in male patients.[ Nicholls et al also found lowering the TG/HDL-C ratio is associated with a beneficial impact on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in DM patients for long-term care.[ In our study, patients with a low TG/HDL-C ratio, with and without DM, had worse outcomes and those without DM, but with a high TG/HDL-C ratio had better outcomes than other groups. Therefore, the value of TG/HDL-C presented the lipid paradox in the acute phase. Lipids may be crucial for cell survival during the acute phase of AMI in the presence of life-threatening ischemia and a fulminant reactive inflammatory response, when cells and cell membranes are vulnerable.[ Physiologically, LDL-C is a critical component of cell and hormones, and an LDL-C level < 30 mg/dL is reportedly associated with an increase in psychiatric and hepatobiliary disorders.[ Another large population study also revealed that patients with non-STEMI, but with a history of hypercholesterolemia had lower in-hospital mortality.[ This lipid paradox has also been found in the elderly, as well as those with rheumatoid arthritis, or HF, or stroke.[ The lipid paradox was also observed in those with AMI who were also at high risk of malnutrition.[ Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy is still recommended for patients with AMI, but improvement of suboptimal nutritional status may be more beneficial than strict LDL-C control when treating patients at high risk of malnutrition.[ In one previous study, a high mortality rate (17.8% at 1-year follow-up period) was noted in patients with DM and STEMI.[ In our study, those with DM, but without a high TG/HDL-C ratio had the worst clinical outcomes (one-year CV mortality: 12.5%; and one-year all-cause mortality: 17.3%). On the other hand, STEMI patients with a low TG/HDL ratio both with and without DM, had worse outcomes. However, based on current dyslipidemia guidelines, appropriate intensity of statin therapy should be used to reduce high atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk, especially in patients with prior MI.[ In the acute phase, lipids still have a critical role in cell membrane synthesis and cell survival. In addition, the lipid profile reflects nutritional status. Even though a high TG/HDL ratio indicates insulin resistance, an inverse effect is observed in STEMI patients with or without DM. Thyroid functions also play an important impact on the TG level and TG/HDL ratio.[ In acute illness including STEMI, most patients may present abnormal thyroid function and difficultly interpret.[ Therefore, the relationship between thyroid profile and lipid profile in STEMI patients may need a large cohort study to explore. As a limitation, this was a retrospective study from a single medical center. However, the current strategy for lipid control has only focused on lowering the serum LDL-C level and has not considered nutritional status and acuity of illness. In our STEMI registry, the thyroid profile was not regularly checked, so we could not provide this relationship between TG/HDL-C ratio and thyroid profile. Our study demonstrated that a high TG/HDL-C ratio was not a treatment target in the acute phase of MI in patients with or without DM. TG/HDL-C ratio is an atherogenic marker that correlated to insulin resistance, blood pressure, and metabolic syndrome. This value also presented the lipid paradox in the STEMI population during the acute phase.

Conclusions

Even though a high TG/HDL-C ratio is associated with insulin resistance, patients with or without DM, but with a high TG/HDL-C ratio, had better 30-day and 1-year outcomes.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Huang-Chung Chen. Data curation: Huang-Chung Chen, Wei-Chieh Lee. Formal analysis: Wei-Chieh Lee. Investigation: Wei-Chieh Lee. Methodology: Wei-Chieh Lee. Project administration: Wei-Chieh Lee. Resources: Wei-Chieh Lee, Hsiu-Yu Fang, Chih-Yuan Fang, Chien-Jen Chen, Cheng-Hsu Yang, Chiung-Jen Wu. Software: Wei-Chieh Lee. Writing – original draft: Wei-Chieh Lee. Writing – review & editing: Wei-Chieh Lee.
  37 in total

1.  Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions.

Authors:  Donald E Cutlip; Stephan Windecker; Roxana Mehran; Ashley Boam; David J Cohen; Gerrit-Anne van Es; P Gabriel Steg; Marie-angèle Morel; Laura Mauri; Pascal Vranckx; Eugene McFadden; Alexandra Lansky; Martial Hamon; Mitchell W Krucoff; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Residual cardiovascular risk despite optimal LDL cholesterol reduction with statins: the evidence, etiology, and therapeutic challenges.

Authors:  Uchechukwu K Sampson; Sergio Fazio; MacRae F Linton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Cholesterol and all-cause mortality in elderly people from the Honolulu Heart Program: a cohort study.

Authors:  I J Schatz; K Masaki; K Yano; R Chen; B L Rodriguez; J D Curb
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Lipid paradox in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Potential impact of malnutrition.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Lu; Shu-Fen Lu; Ruey-Hsing Chou; Po-Shan Wu; Yu-Chen Ku; Chin-Sung Kuo; Chun-Chin Chang; Yi-Lin Tsai; Cheng-Hsueh Wu; Po-Hsun Huang
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Tony Dans; Alvaro Avezum; Fernando Lanas; Matthew McQueen; Andrzej Budaj; Prem Pais; John Varigos; Liu Lisheng
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Sep 11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Impact of low level of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol sampled in overnight fasting state on the clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (difference between ST-segment and non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction).

Authors:  Mi Seon Ji; Myung Ho Jeong; Young Keun Ahn; Young Jo Kim; Shung Chull Chae; Taek Jong Hong; In Whan Seong; Jei Keon Chae; Chong Jin Kim; Myeong Chan Cho; Seung-Woon Rha; Jang Ho Bae; Ki Bae Seung; Seung Jung Park
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Reverse epidemiology in systolic and nonsystolic heart failure: cumulative prognostic benefit of classical cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  Gülmisal Güder; Stefan Frantz; Johann Bauersachs; Bruno Allolio; Christoph Wanner; Michael T Koller; Georg Ertl; Christiane E Angermann; Stefan Störk
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 8.790

8.  Triglyceride to high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio may serve as a useful predictor of major adverse coronary event in female revascularized ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Guo-Xing Wan; Wen-Bin Xia; Li-Hua Ji; Hai-Lun Qin; Yong-Gang Zhang
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 9.  Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Thomas A Gaziano; Asaf Bitton; Shuchi Anand; Shafika Abrahams-Gessel; Adrianna Murphy
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.200

10.  Does the association of the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with fasting serum insulin differ by race/ethnicity?

Authors:  Chaoyang Li; Earl S Ford; Yuan-Xiang Meng; Ali H Mokdad; Gerald M Reaven
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 9.951

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Impact and Prognostic Role of Triglyceride to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes at Very High Risk: Insights From the START Study.

Authors:  Leonardo De Luca; Pier Luigi Temporelli; Furio Colivicchi; Lucio Gonzini; Maria Luisa Fasano; Massimo Pantaleoni; Gabriella Greco; Fabrizio Oliva; Domenico Gabrielli; Michele Massimo Gulizia
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-13

2.  Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio predict long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis of 9 studies.

Authors:  Hong-Tao Liu; Zhong-Hui Jiang; Zhong-Bin Yang; Xiao-Qing Quan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.