Literature DB >> 33119899

Deep learning-based radiomics predicts response to chemotherapy in colorectal liver metastases.

Jingwei Wei1,2,3, Jin Cheng4, Dongsheng Gu1,2,3, Fan Chai4, Nan Hong4, Yi Wang4, Jie Tian1,2,3,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a deep learning (DL)-based radiomics model to predict the response to chemotherapy in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 192 patients diagnosed with CRLM who received first-line chemotherapy and were followed by response assessment. Tumor response was identified according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images were fed as inputs of the ResNet10-based DL radiomics model, and the possibility of response was predicted as the output. The final combined DL radiomics model was constructed by integrating the response-related clinical factors and the developed DL radiomics signature. A time-independent validation cohort (n = 48) was extracted from the 192 patients to evaluate the DL model with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity. Meanwhile, a traditional radiomics model was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) as comparisons with the DL-based model.
RESULTS: According to RECIST criteria, 131 patients were identified as responders with complete response, partial response, and stable disease, while 61 patients were nonresponders with progression disease. The selected predictive clinical factor turned out to be the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level with AUC of 0.489 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.380-0.599) and 0.558 (95% CI, 0.374-0.741) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The DL-based model provided better performance than the traditional classifier-based radiomics model with significantly higher AUC (training: 0.903 [95% CI, 0.851-0.955] vs 0.745 [95% CI, 0.659-0.831]; validation: 0.820 [95% CI, 0.681-0.959] vs 0.598 [95% CI, 0.422-0.774]). The combination of DL-based model with the CEA level provided slightly increased performance with AUC of 0.935 [95% CI, 0.897-0.973] in the training cohort and 0.830 [95% CI, 0.688-0.973] in the validation cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: The developed DL-based radiomics model could improve the efficiency to predict the response to chemotherapy in CRLM, which may assist in subsequent personalized treatment decision-making in CRLM management.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemotherapy; colorectal liver metastases; contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography; deep learning; radiomics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33119899     DOI: 10.1002/mp.14563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of performances of conventional and deep learning-based methods in segmentation of lung vessels and registration of chest radiographs.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiaomeng Gu; Qiming Fang; Qiang Li
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2020-09-11

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence Predictive Models of Response to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Alone or Combined to Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Valentina Russo; Eleonora Lallo; Armelle Munnia; Miriana Spedicato; Luca Messerini; Romina D'Aurizio; Elia Giuseppe Ceroni; Giulia Brunelli; Antonio Galvano; Antonio Russo; Ida Landini; Stefania Nobili; Marcello Ceppi; Marco Bruzzone; Fabio Cianchi; Fabio Staderini; Mario Roselli; Silvia Riondino; Patrizia Ferroni; Fiorella Guadagni; Enrico Mini; Marco Peluso
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Prediction of placenta accreta spectrum by combining deep learning and radiomics using T2WI: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Zhengjie Ye; Rongrong Xuan; Menglin Ouyang; Yutao Wang; Jian Xu; Wei Jin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-12

Review 4.  A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Wang; Muhammad-Adil Khalil; Nabila Puspita Firdi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 5.  A primer on texture analysis in abdominal radiology.

Authors:  Natally Horvat; Joao Miranda; Maria El Homsi; Jacob J Peoples; Niamh M Long; Amber L Simpson; Richard K G Do
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-11-26

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Gianluca Rompianesi; Francesca Pegoraro; Carlo Dl Ceresa; Roberto Montalti; Roberto Ivan Troisi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  An update on radiomics techniques in primary liver cancers.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Sergio Venazio Setola; Igino Simonetti; Diletta Cozzi; Giulia Grazzini; Francesca Grassi; Andrea Belli; Vittorio Miele; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.965

Review 8.  Is precision medicine for colorectal liver metastases still a utopia? New perspectives by modern biomarkers, radiomics, and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Luca Viganò; Visala S Jayakody Arachchige; Francesco Fiz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.374

Review 9.  The Role of Biomarkers in the Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Daniel Brock Hewitt; Zachary J Brown; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  Radiomics in hepatic metastasis by colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Maria Luisa Barretta; Carmine Picone; Antonio Avallone; Andrea Belli; Renato Patrone; Marilina Ferrante; Diletta Cozzi; Roberta Grassi; Roberto Grassi; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.965

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.